Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 72
Science and Its Role in the National Marine Fisheries Service Cases Cited American Oceans Campaign v. Daley, No. 99-982, slip opinion (D.D.C. Sept. 14, 2000). Brower v. Evans, 257 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2001). Conservation Law Foundation v. Evans, No. 00-1134, slip opinion (D.D.C. Dec. 28, 2001). Fishermen’s Dock Cooperative, Inc. v. Brown, 75 F.3d 164, 1996 (4th Cir. 1996). Greenpeace v. National Marine Fisheries Service, 55 F.Supp.2d 1248 (W.D. Wash. 1999). Greenpeace v. National Marine Fisheries Service, 80 F.Supp.2d 1137 and 106 F.Supp.2d 1066 (W.D. Wash. 2000). Greenpeace Foundation v. Mineta, 122 F.Supp2d. 1123 (D. Haw. 2000). Leatherback Sea Turtle v. National Marine Fisheries Service, No. 99-00152, slip opinion (D. Haw. Oct. 18, 1999).Natural Resources Defense Council v. Daley, 209 F.3d 747 (D.C. Cir. 2000). Natural Resources Defense Council v. Evans, 168 F.Supp.2d 1149 (N.D. Cal. 2001). North Carolina Fisherman’s Assoc. v. Daley, 152 F.Supp.2d 870 (E.D. Va. 2001).
Representative terms from entire chapter: