The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Page 49
versity system initiated an effort to develop and implement an
intellectual property policy and a technology transfer program.
As background, several years ago most technology in Nevada was
associated with the federal government, i.e., with the Nevada Test
Site or the Department of Defense or with the University of Nevada
System. Because of the nature of the business and security concerns,
the operation of the Nevada Test Site has essentially been a closed
industry and now, with the exception of activities at Yucca Mountain
and its use as a geological repository, it is a nongrowth industry
with little opportunity for the development of spin-off companies. The
main industry in Nevada now is gaming and tourism, and
diversification, which was not attractive to the casinos in the past,
is now considered essential to the sustainability of the gaming and
tourism industry.
Small companies in Nevada are the backbone of the business development
community. For example, 40 percent of the new businesses in Clark
County, Nevada (the county that includes the city of Las Vegas) have
four employees or fewer; nearly 20 percent have 5 to 9 employees and
almost 13 percent have from 10 to 19 employees. By contrast, only 0.3
percent of the businesses in Clark County have 1,000 or more
employees, and 0.2 percent have from 500 to 999 employees.
More generally, the common characteristics of most state technology
development programs beginning in the early 1980s include the creation
of tripartite linkages between state economic development agencies,
universities, and private industry; a recognition of the importance of
technology development as a key ingredient of economic renewal and
diversity; and a significant investment of funds. Matching funding,
however, is typically required either from federal, state, or private
sources.
Differences in these programs tended to be more numerous. Some of the
more significant differences were the degree to which basic or applied
research is emphasized; the nature of the relationship and degree of
private sector involvement; the manner in which state funds are
distributed; and the degree of accountability that is applied to the
programs.
In 1983 the North Carolina State Legislature established the
Technology Development Authority (NCTDA) ( www.nctda.com ) to create jobs and wealth
throughout the state and gave it authority to establish incubators to
transfer technologies into commercial applications by private
industry. Since then the NCTDA has expanded its offerings to
effectively provide and connect entrepreneurs through business
incubation, venture capital, technology transfer, rural initiatives,
and entrepreneurial expertise to commercialize promising business
opportunities.
The incubators typically provide office and laboratory space,
consultant expertise, an administrative infrastructure, and Internet
access. The goal, of course, is to graduate, and the incubators
provide incentives by