References

Acemoglu D, Angrist J. 1998. Consequences of Employment Protection? The Case of the Americans with Disabilities Act. NBER Working Paper No. w6670. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA.

ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act). [Online]. Available: http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/pubs/ada.txt. [Accessed August, 2001.]

Adler M. 1996. Federal disability programs. Encyclopedia of Financial Gerontology. Institute for Socio-Financial Studies. Middleburg, VA.

AIR (American Institutes for Research). 2000. Synthesis, Integration, and Completion of Research into a New Disability Decision Making Process and Development of an Initial Prototype of That Process. Prepared under contract with SSA (Contract No. 0440-97-32258). Washington, DC.

AMA (American Medical Association). 1993. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 4th ed. Chicago: American Medical Association.

Autor D, Duggan MG. 2001. The Rise in Recipiency and the Decline in Unemployment. NBER Working Paper No. w8336. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA.


Badley EM. 1993. An introduction to the concepts and classifications of the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Disability and Rehabilitation 15:161–178.

Badley EM. 1995. The genesis of handicap: Definitions, models of disablement, and role of external factors. Disability and Rehabilitation 17:53–62.

Berk RA, Rossi PH. 1990. Thinking About Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Berkowitz E. 1997. The historical development of social security in the United States. In: Kingson ER, Schulz JH, eds. Social Security in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.

Berkowitz M, Burton J. 1987. Permanent Disability Benefits in Workers Compensation. W.E. Upjohn Institute.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 148
The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs References Acemoglu D, Angrist J. 1998. Consequences of Employment Protection? The Case of the Americans with Disabilities Act. NBER Working Paper No. w6670. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA. ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act). [Online]. Available: http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/pubs/ada.txt. [Accessed August, 2001.] Adler M. 1996. Federal disability programs. Encyclopedia of Financial Gerontology. Institute for Socio-Financial Studies. Middleburg, VA. AIR (American Institutes for Research). 2000. Synthesis, Integration, and Completion of Research into a New Disability Decision Making Process and Development of an Initial Prototype of That Process. Prepared under contract with SSA (Contract No. 0440-97-32258). Washington, DC. AMA (American Medical Association). 1993. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 4th ed. Chicago: American Medical Association. Autor D, Duggan MG. 2001. The Rise in Recipiency and the Decline in Unemployment. NBER Working Paper No. w8336. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA. Badley EM. 1993. An introduction to the concepts and classifications of the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Disability and Rehabilitation 15:161–178. Badley EM. 1995. The genesis of handicap: Definitions, models of disablement, and role of external factors. Disability and Rehabilitation 17:53–62. Berk RA, Rossi PH. 1990. Thinking About Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Berkowitz E. 1997. The historical development of social security in the United States. In: Kingson ER, Schulz JH, eds. Social Security in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press. Berkowitz M, Burton J. 1987. Permanent Disability Benefits in Workers Compensation. W.E. Upjohn Institute.

OCR for page 148
The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs Birren J, Dieckermann L. 1991. Concepts and content of quality of life in the later years: An overview. In: Birren J et al., eds. Quality of Life in the Frail Elderly. New York, NY: Academic Press 344–360. BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). January 1999. Employment and Earnings, 1998. U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC. Bound J. 1989. The health and earnings of rejected disability insurance applicants. The American Economic Review 79(3):482-503. Bound J, Waidmann T. October 2000. Accounting for the Recent Declines in Employment Rates Among the Working-Aged Disabled. Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7975. Bound J, Waidmann T. June 2001. Accounting for recent declines in employment rates among working-aged men and women with disabilities. Paper presented at the Cornell Employment and Disability Policy Institute conference, The Persistence of Low Employment Rates for People with Disabilities: Causes and Policy Implications. October 2001. Washington, DC. Burkhauser R, Daly M, Houtenville A. January 2000. How working age people with disabilities fared over the 1990s business cycle. Rehabilitation Research and Training Center for Economic Research on Employment Policy for Persons with Disabilities. Cornell University. Ithaca, NY. Burkhauser R, Daly M, Houtenville A, Nargis N. March 2001. Economic outcomes of working-age people with disabilities over the business cycle: An examination of the 1980s and 1990s. Paper presented at the Cornell Employment and Disability Policy Institute conference, The Persistence of Low Employment Rates for People with Disabilities: Causes and Policy Implications. October 2001. Washington, DC. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 1988. CDC Surveillance Update. Atlanta, Georgia. Census (Bureau of the Census) and BLS. 2000. Current Population Survey: Design and Methodology. Technical Paper No. 63. U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC. Cohen M. 1957. A Preface to Logic. New York: Meridian Books. Cohen S. 1999. (Submitted for publication to Medical Care) Design and Estimation Strategies and Innovations in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for the Measurement of Health Care Expenditures and Quality. Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. DeLeire T. 2000a. The unintended consequences of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Regulation 23(1):21–25. DeLeire T. 2000b. The wage and employment effects of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Human Resources XXXV(4):693–715. DHHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). 1982. Implementation of Section 304(g) of Public Law 96-265, Social Security Disability Amendments of 1980. Report to the Congress by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC: DHHS, Social Security Administration. DHHS. 1992 (unpublished). The Social Security Disability Insurance Program: An Analysis. Report of the Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC. Fleishman EA. 1972. Structure and measurement of psychomotor abilities. In: Singer RN, ed. The Psychomotor Domain: Movement Behavior. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger. Fleishman EA. 1999. Linking components of functional capacity domains with work requirements. In: Wunderlich GS, ed. Measuring Functional Capacity and Work Requirements. Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

OCR for page 148
The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs Fougeyrolles P. 1995. Documenting environmental factors for preventing the handicap creation process: Quebec contribution to ICIDH and social participation of people with functional differences. Disability and Rehabilitation 17(3/4):145–153. Fougeyrollas P, ed. 1998. ICIDH and Environmental Factors International Network. Vol. 9, Nos. 2–3. Quebec, Canada: Canadian Society for the ICIDH. Frey WD. 1984. Functional assessment in the ‘80s: A conceptual enigma, A technical challenge. Chapter 1 in Functional Assessment in Rehabilitation. Halpern AS, Fuhrer MJ, eds. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company. Friedman S, Wachs T. 1999. Measuring Environment Across the Life Span: Emerging Methods and Concepts. Washington, DC. American Psychological Association. Gallicchio S, Bye B. 1980. Consistency of Initial Disability Decisions Among and Within States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, (DHHS/SSA): SSA Pub. No. 13–11869 GAO (U.S. General Accounting Office). 1994. Social Security Disability: SSA Quality Assurance Improvements Can Produce More Accurate Payments. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS–94–107. Washington, DC: GAO. GAO. 1995. Social Security Disability: Management Action and Program Redesign Needed to Address Long-Standing Problems. Testimony by Jane L. Ross to the Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS–95–233. Washington, DC: GAO. GAO. 1996. SSA Disability Engineering: Project Magnitude and Complexity Impede Implementation. Testimony by Diana S. Eisenstat to the Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS–96–211. Washington, DC: GAO. GAO. 1997a. Supplemental Security Income: Long-Standing Problems Put Program at Risk for Fraud, Waste, and Abuse. Testimony by Jane L. Ross to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS–97–88. Washington, DC: GAO. GAO. 1997b. Social Security Disability: SSA Must Hold Itself Accountable for Continued Improvement in Decision-Making. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS–97–102. Washington, DC: GAO. GAO. 1998 SSA’s Management Challenges: Strong Leadership Needed to Turn Plans into Timely, Meaningful Actions. Testimony by Jane L. Ross to the Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-98-113. Washington, DC: GAO. Groves RM. 1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: John Wiley. Gustafson S, Rose A, Mulqueen C, Matheson N, Michel R, Bott C. 2000. Synthesis, Integration, and Completion of Research into a New Disability Decision Making Process and Development of an Initial Prototype on That Process. American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC. Haber L. 1971. Disabling effects of chronic disease and impairment. Journal of Chronic Diseases 24(7):469–487. Hale TW. 2001. The lack of a disability measure in today’s Current Population Survey. Monthly Labor Review, 38–40. Helmick C, Lawrence R, Pollard R, Lloyd E, Heyse S. 1995. Arthritis and other rheumatic conditions: Who is affected now, who will be affected later? Arthritis Care and Research 8:203–211. Hu J, Lahiri K, Vaughan D, Wixon B. 1997. A Structural Model of Social Security’s Disability Determination Process. ORES Working Paper Series, No. 72 Ed. Washington, DC: SSA, Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics.

OCR for page 148
The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs Institute for Health and Aging. 1997. Strengthening Policy Development Work Within the Social Security Administration: A Review of the Mission, Resources, and Capabilities in the Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics. San Francisco: University of California. IOM (Institute of Medicine). 1991. Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press IOM. 1997a. Disability Evaluation Study Design: First Interim Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. IOM. 1997b. Enabling America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press IOM. 1998. The Social Security Administration’s Disability Decision Process: A Framework for Research: Second Interim Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. IOM. 1999a. Measuring Functional Capacity and Work Requirements: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. IOM. 1999b. Review of the Disability Evaluation Study Design: Third Interim Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. IOM. 2000. Survey Measurement of Work Disability: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Jacobs E, ed. 1999. Handbook of Labor Statistics. Lanham, MD: Bernan Press. Jette A, Assmann S, Rooks D, Harris B, Crawford S. 1998. Interrelationships among disablement concepts. Journal of Gerontology: Med Sci 53A(5):M395–M404. Kennedy C, Gruenberg EM. 1987. A lexicology for the consequences of mental disorders. Chapter One in Psychiatric Disability: Clinical, Legal and Administrative Dimensions. Myerson AT, Fine T, eds. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc. Lahiri K, Vaughan D, Wixon B. 1995. Modeling SSA’s sequential disability determination process using matched SIPP data. Social Security Bulletin 58(4):3–42. LaPlante MP. 1991. Disability risks of chronic illnesses and impairments. Disability Statistics Report (2). Washington, DC: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education. LaPlante MP. 1996. Highlights from the National Health Interview Survey Disability Study. Presentation to the Committee to Review the Social Security Administration’s Disability Decision Process Research, Institute of Medicine and Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council. Washington, DC. LaPlante MP, Carlson D. 1996. Disability in the United States: Prevalence and causes, 1992. Disability Statistics Report (7). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institutes on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. LaPlante MP, Kennedy J, Kaye HS, Wenger B. 1996. Disability and employment. Disability Statistics Abstract, Number 11. Disability Statistics Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, University of California, San Francisco. Last JM, ed. 1983. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press. Lawrence R, Jette A. 1996. Disentangling the disablement process. Journal of Gerontology: Soc. Sci 51B (4):S173–S182. Lawton MP. 1983. Environment and other determinants of well-being in older people. Gerontologist 23:349–357. Lechner D, Roth D, Straaton K. 1997. Functional capacity evaluation in work disability. Work 1:31–47. Lessler JT, Kalsbeek WD. 1992. Nonsampling Errors in Surveys. New York: John Wiley. Levine L. 2000. The Employment of People with Disabilities in the 1990s. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. Washington, DC. Levine S, Croog S. 1984. What constitutes quality of life? A conceptualization of the dimensions of life quality in healthy populations and patients with cardiovascular disease. In: Wenger N et al., eds. Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. New York: LeJacq Publication. Co. Pp. 46–66.

OCR for page 148
The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs Marge M. 1988. Health promotion for people with disabilities: Moving beyond rehabilitation. American Journal of Health Promotion 2(4):29–44. Mashaw JL. 1983. Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims. Yale University Press. New Haven and London. Mashaw JL. 1997. Disability: Why does the search for good programs continue? In: Kingson ER, Schulz JH, eds. Social Security in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press. Mashaw JL, Reno VP, eds. 1996. Disability Policy Panel Report: Balancing Security and Opportunity: The Challenge of Disability Income Policy. National Academy of Social Insurance. Washington, DC. Mather JH. 1993. The problem of functional assessment: political and economic perspectives. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 47(3):240–246. Mathiowetz N. May 27–28, 1999. Methodological issues in the measurement of work disability. In: IOM. Survey Measurement of Work Disability: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 3:28–52. Muller LS, Wheeler PM. 1995. Disability Program Growth: Results from Social Security’s Survey of Field Office Managers. Paper presented at the joint SSA and ASPE conference, The Social Security Administration’s Disability Programs: Explanations of Recent Growth and Implications for Disability Policy. July 1995. Washington DC. Nagi S. 1964. A study in the evaluation of disability and rehabilitation potential: Concepts, methods, and procedures. American Journal of Public Health 54: 1568–1579. Nagi S. 1965. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman MB, ed. Sociology and Rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. Nagi S. 1976. An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly: Health and Society 54:439–467. Nagi S. 1979. The concept and measurement of disability. Chapter One in Disability Policies and Government Programs. Berkowitz ED, ed. New York: Praeger Publishers. Nagi S. 1991. Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In: IOM. Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. OIG (Office of the Inspector General, SSA). 2000. Status of the Social Security Administration’s Updates to the Medical Listings. SSA pub No A-01-99-21009. Washington DC. Parsons T. 1951. The Social System. New York: The Free Press. Parsons T. 1958. Definitions of health and illness in the light of American values and social structure. In: Jaco EG, ed. Patients, Physicians, and Illness. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press. Patrick D. 1997. Rethinking prevention for people with disabilities part I: A conceptual model for promoting health. American Journal of Health Promotion 11(4):257–260 Patrick D, Peach H, eds. 1989. Disablement in the Community: A Sociomedical Press Perspective. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Rand M. 2001. Developing the capacity to measure crime victimization of people with disabilities. In: Seminar on Integrating Federal Statistical Information and Processes. Statistical Policy. Working Paper 32. Office of Management and Budget, Statistical Policy Office. Washington, DC. Reno V. 1999. Adapting measurement of functional capacity to work to SSA’s disability decision process. In: IOM. Measuring Functional Capacity and Work Requirements. Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Rodgers W, Miller B. 1997. A comparative analysis of ADL questions in surveys of older people. Journal of Gerontology 52B:21-36. Rupp K, Stapleton D. 1995. Determination of the growth in the Social Security Administration’s disability programs—An overview. Social Security Bulletin 58(4):43–69. SSA pub No. 13–11700. Washington DC.

OCR for page 148
The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs Sarbin T, Allen V. 1968. Role theory. In: Linsey G, Aronson E, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publ. Co. Schneider M. 2001. Participation and Environment in the ICF and Measurement of Disability. Paper presented at the United Nations International Seminar on the Measurement of Disability. United Nations, New York, NY. SSA ( Social Security Administration). 1981. Annual Statistical Supplement to the Social Security Bulletin. Washington, DC: SSA. SSA. April 1993. (unpublished draft) Documentation of the SSA Disability Claim and Appeal Process. Washington, DC: SSA, Office of Human Resources, Office of Workforce Analysis. SSA. 1994a. Plan for a New Disability Claim Process. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (DHHS/SSA): SSA Pub. No. 01–005. SSA. 1994b. Disability Process Redesign: Next Steps in Implementation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (DHHS/SSA): SSA Pub. No.01–006. SSA. 1996. Research plan for the development of a redesigned method of evaluating disability in social security claims. Federal Register 61(175):47542–47544. SSA. 1997. Progress report on development of a redesigned method of evaluating disability in social security claims. Federal Register 62(121):34097–34101. SSA. 1998. Disability Redesign—Overview and Status [Online]. Available: http://www.ssa.gov/DPRT/DPRT_intro.html. [Accessed January 26, 1998.] SSA. 1999a. Annual Statistical Supplement to the Social Security Bulletin. Washington, DC: SSA. SSA. 1999b (unpublished draft). Improving the Disability Adjudication Process in the Post-Redesign Era. (Presented to the Committee to Review the Social Security Administration’s Disability Decision Process Research at its October 1999 meeting.) SSA, Office of Disability. SSA. 1999c. Social Security Disability Insurance Program Worker Experience. Actuarial Study No. 114. SSA Pub. No. 11-11543. Washington, DC. SSA. 2000. Annual Report of the Supplemental Security Income Program. Washington, DC: SSA. SSA. 2001a. Disability Evaluation Under Social Security. Washington, DC: SSA Pub. No. 64–039 SSA. 2001b. SSI Annual Statistical Report 2000. SSA. Washington, DC. SSA. 2001c. Annual Report of the Supplemental Security Income Program. SSA. Washington, DC. SSA. 2001d. Annual Statistical Supplement, 2001 to the Social Security Bulletin. SSA Publ. No. 13–11700. Washington, DC: SSA. SSAB (Social Security Advisory Board). 1997. Developing Social Security Policy: How the Social Security Administration Can Provide Greater Policy Leadership. Social Security Advisory Board. Washington, DC. SSAB. 1998. Strengthening Social Security Research: The Responsibilities of the Social Security Administration. Social Security Advisory Board. Washington, DC. SSAB. 2001. Charting the Future of Social Security’s Disability Programs: The Need for Fundamental Change. Social Security Advisory Board. Washington, DC. SSAB. 2002. SSA’s Obligation to Ensure That the Public’s Funds Are Responsibly Collected and Expended. Social Security Advisory Board. Washington, DC. Stapleton D, Dietrich K. 1995. Long Term Trends and Cycles in Application and Award Growth. Paper presented at the Conference on the Social Security Administration’s Disability Programs: Explanation of Recent Growth and Implications for Disability Policy. Sponsored by Social Security Administration and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, DHHS, July 1995.

OCR for page 148
The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs Stapleton D, Coleman K, Dietrich K. 1995 Demographic and Economic Determinants of Recent Applications and Awards Growth for SSA’s Disability Programs. Paper presented at the Conference on the Social Security Administration’s Disability Programs: Explanation of Recent Growth and Implications for Disability Policy. Sponsored by Social Security Administration and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, DHHS, July 1995. Stapleton D, Coleman K, Dietrich K, Livermore G. 1998 Empirical analysis of DI and SSI application and award growth. In: Kalman R, Stapleton D, eds. Growth in Disability Benefits: Explanations and Policy Implications. Kalamazoo, Michigan: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. Statistics Canada. 1993. Adults with Disabilities: Their Employment and Education Characteristics. 1991 Health and Activity Limitation Survey. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Catalogue 82–554. Stoddard S, Jans L, Ripple J, Kraus L. 1998. Chartbook on Work and Disability in the United States, 1998. An InfoUse Report. Washington, DC: U.S. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Thornberry OT, Massey JT. 1988. Trends in United States telephone coverage across time and subgroups. In Groves RM, Biemer PP, Lyberg LE, Massey JT, Nicholls WL, Waksberg J, eds. Telephone Survey Methodology. New York: John Wiley, 1988, pp. 25–49. Todorov A, Kirchner C. 2000. Bias in proxies’ reports of disability: Data from the National Health Interview Survey on Disability. American Journal of Public Health. 90(8):1248–1253. Trupin L, Sebesta D, Yelin E, LaPlante M. 1997. Trends in labor force participation among persons with disabilities, 1983–1994. Disability Statistics Report 10. Washington, DC: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education. U.S.House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means. October 2000. 2000 Green Book. Committee Print. 106th Congress, 2nd Session. WMCP:106–14. Washington, DC. Verbrugge LM. 1990. The iceberg of disability. In: Stahl SM, ed. The Legacy of Longevity: Health and Health Care in Later Life. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Verbrugge L, Jette A. 1994. The disablement process. Soc Sci & Med 38(1): 1–14. Westat. 1999a (unpublished). Disability Evaluation Study—Instruments and Procedures: Task 4, Report 1. Submitted to Social Security Administration, Washington, DC. Westat. 1999b (unpublished). Disability Evaluation Study—Final Sample Design Report: Task 4, Report 2. (Includes Pilot Study Design.) Submitted to Social Security Administration, Washington, DC. Westat. 1999c (unpublished). Disability Evaluation Study—Plans to Meet Response Rate Goals: Task 4, Report 3. Submitted to Social Security Administration, Washington, DC. Westat. 1999d (unpublished). Disability Evaluation Study—Pilot Study Design Report: Task 4, Report 4, Final Report. Submitted to Social Security Administration, Washington, DC. Whiteneck G. 2001. Validated measures of participation and the environment from Craig Hospital CHART and CHIEF. Paper presented at the International Seminar on the Measurement of the Environment held on June 4–6, 2001. United Nations. New York. WHO (World Health Organization). 1947. Constitution of the World Health Organization. New York, NY: World Health Organization. WHO. 1980. The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps—A Manual Relating to the Consequences of Disease. Geneva. WHO. WHO. 1997. ICIDH-2: International Classification of Impairments, Activities, and Participation. A Manual of Dimensions of Disablement and Functioning. Beta-1 draft for field trials. Geneva: WHO. WHO. 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Geneva: WHO.

OCR for page 148
The Dynamics of Disability: Measuring and Monitoring Disability for Social Security Programs Yelin E. 1992. Disability and the Displaced Worker. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Yelin E. 1999. Measuring functional capacity of persons with disabilities in light of emerging demands in the workplace. In: IOM. Measuring Functional Capacity and Work Requirements: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 2:4–27. Yelin E, Nevitt M, Epstein W. 1980. Toward an epidemiology of work disability. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly: Health and Society 58(3):386–415