National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$34.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Animal Biotechnology: Science Based Concerns (2002)
Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources (BANR)
Board on Life Sciences (BLS)

Citation Manager

. "2. Applications of Biotechnology Techniques." Animal Biotechnology: Science Based Concerns. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2002.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
39
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Animal Biotechnology: Science-Based Concerns

PROPAGATION BY NUCLEAR TRANSFER

In February of 1997, Dolly the sheep was introduced (Wilmut et al., 1997) and the public subsequently was inundated with opinions about the power and potential of creating new animals from somatic cells. Dolly represented the most recent advance in genetic technology—the production of multiple individuals nearly genetically identical to an adult animal. In this technique, somatic cells from an appropriate tissue are grown in culture and their nuclei are injected into enucleated oocytes obtained from another individual of the same or a closely related species. After a further period of culture, the partially developed embryos are transferred into a foster mother. This technology is being developed rapidly for many species of interest (Table 2.1) and promises to become a rapid and efficient means of propagating domestic animals with desired traits, whether those are naturally derived and selected or genetically engineered (Betthauser et al., 2000; Lanza et al., 2001; Westhusin et al., 2001). The process often is referred to as “cloning” (see Chapter 1). The nuclear transfer technique was based on previous studies in frogs conducted during the previous 5 decades (Briggs et al., 1951; Prather et al., 1999), but, until Dolly, it was unclear whether nuclei from highly differentiated somatic cells could be reprogrammed to a pattern of gene expression suitable for directing normal development of a mammalian embryo.

TABLE 2.1 State of the art of transgenic technology for selected organisms.

Organism

Transfection

Viral vectors

Transposon

ES cells

Nuclear transfer

Mouse

4a

2

1

4a

2

Cow

3

1

0

0

2

Sheep

3

0

0

0

2

Goat

3

0

0

0

2

Pig

3

0

0

0

2

Rabbit

3

0

0

1

0

Chicken

1

2

1

0

0

Altlantic salmon

3

0

0

0

0

Channel catfish

2

0

0

0

0

Tilapia

3

0

0

0

0

Zebrafish

1

0

0

1

1

Crustaceans

1

1

0

0

0

Mollusks

1

1

0

0

0

Drosophila

2

2

2

2

0

Mosquito

1

0

2

0

0

NOTE: 0: No significant progress.

1: Has been accomplished experimentally (proof of concept).

2: Routine experimental use.

3: Commercialization sought.

4: Widespread production.

a For experimental uses.

See (Dove, 2000)

Page
39