Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK + PDF
your price: $41.00
add to cart

PAPERBACK
list:$34.95
Web:$31.46
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $27.00
add to cart

PDF CHAPTERS
your price: $2.80
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Animal Biotechnology: Science Based Concerns (2002)
Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources (BANR)
Board on Life Sciences (BLS)

Page
60
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Animal Biotechnology: Science-Based Concerns

is likely that some local infection of host cells would occur. The subsequent events necessary for generation of pathogenic, transmissible viruses increasingly are unlikely, but on some unknown, arbitrary scale. Although the probability of inadvertent creation of a new epidemic generally is judged to be extremely small (particularly given the long history of intimate association between humans and pigs), it cannot be ignored altogether. Current FDA policy is to permit xenotransplantation trials to proceed, but to require close monitoring of recipients, and (insofar as possible) of their contacts (DHHS, 2001). Attempts also are being made to identify specific proviruses responsible for production of infectious virus and then to selectively breed them out of lines of animals to be used as transplant donors (Herring et al., 2001).

TABLE 3.4 Theoretical scale of risks associated with PERV transmission from xenotransplants.

Event

Cumulative Probability

Expression of infectious virus

 

Localized infection of host cells

Spreading infection in the host

Persistent viremia

Disease (e.g., lymphoma, “AIDS”)

Transmission to close contacts

Spreading, epidemic transmission

Page
60