National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$49.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

The Polygraph and Lie Detection (2003)
Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences (BBCSS)
Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT)

Citation Manager

. "5 Evidence from Polygraph Research: Quantitative Assessment." The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
126
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


The Polygraph and Lie Detection

FIGURE 5-3 Sensitivity and false positive rate in seven field datasets on polygraph validity.

NOTE: Points connected by lines come from the same dataset.

similar to and may be slightly higher than that found from polygraph validity studies using laboratory models. (The interquartile range of accuracy indexes for all 59 datasets, laboratory and field, was from 0.81 to 0.91, the same range as for the laboratory studies alone.) In the next section, we discuss what these data suggest for the accuracy of the full population of polygraph tests in the field.

From Research to Reality

Decision makers are concerned with whether the levels of accuracy achieved in research studies correspond to what can be expected in field polygraph use. In experimental research, extrapolation of laboratory re-

Page
126