National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$49.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

The Polygraph and Lie Detection (2003)
Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences (BBCSS)
Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT)

Citation Manager

. "6 Alternative Techniques and Technologies." The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
177
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


The Polygraph and Lie Detection

NOTES

1.  

Reported correlations (Pearson r) are typically between 0.13 and 0.17.

2.  

Integrity tests, conscientiousness measures, and structured interviews typically show correlations in the range of 0.30 to 0.40 with indicators of job performance (Schmidt and Hunter, 1999).

3.  

Test scores showed average correlations of 0.21 and 0.33 with job performance and counterproductivity, respectively; correcting for unreliability and a variety of statistical artifacts, the estimated population correlations were 0.34 and 0.47.

Page
177