DHHS. 2000b. Statement of organization, functions, and delegations of authority. Federal Register 65:30600–30601.

Dustira AK. 1996. The federal role in influencing research ethics education and standards in science. Professional Ethics 5(1-2):139–156.

Francis S. 1999. Developing a federal policy on research misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 5:261–272.

Greenberg DS. 1991. Q&A with NIH Director Bernadine Healy. Science & Government Report 5(1):5.

Guston DH. 1999. Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempt to define research misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 5:137–154.

Guston DH. 2000. Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Hamilton DP. 1991. Can OSI withstand a scientific backlash? Science 253:1084–1086.

Hasselmo N, Stewart D, Phillips K, Magrath CP. 2000. Community Comment on PHS Research Instruction Policy. Letter to Chris B. Pascal, ORI, September 21. [Online]. Available: http://www.aau.edu/research/phs9.21.00.html [Accessed March 14, 2002].

Kaiser M. 1999. Development of international guidelines for research ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 5:293–298.

Koenig R. 2001. Wellcome rules widen the net. Science 293:1411–1413.

Mishkin B. 1999. Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends. Science and Engineering Ethics 5:283–292.

NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, Vol. I. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

OASH (Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health). 1994. Office of Research Integrity: Annual Report, 1993. Washington, DC: OASH.

ORI (Office of Research Integrity). 1993. DAB confirms HHS authority to investigate scientific misconduct. ORI Newsletter 1(4):5.

ORI. 1997. Annual Report, 1996. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD. [Online]. Available: http://ori.dhhs.gov/html/publications/annual-reports.asp#1996 [Accessed March 14, 2002].

ORI. 1999. Review group recommendations being implemented rapidly. ORI Newsletter 8(1):5–6.

ORI. 2000a. ORI director chosen and other senior appointments made. ORI Newsletter 8(4):7.

ORI. 2000b. Final RCR policy provides flexibility and more time to institutions. ORI Newsletter 9(1):1–2.

OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy). 1999. Proposed federal policy on research misconduct to protect the integrity of the research record. Federal Register 64:55722– 55725.

OSTP. 2000. Federal policy on research misconduct. Federal Register 65:76260–76264.

Porter JP, Dustira AK. 1993. Policy development lessons from two federal initiatives: Protecting human research subjects and handling misconduct in science. Academic Medicine 68:S51–S55.

PHS (Public Health Service). 1992. Opportunity for a hearing on Office of Research Integrity scientific misconduct findings. Federal Register 57:53125–53126.

Wheeler DL. 1991, May 15. NIH office that investigates scientists’ misconduct is target of widespread charges of incompetence. The Chronicle of Higher Education. P. A5.

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement