References

Chubin, D., and E. Hackett. 1990. Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.


Kostoff, R. 1997. Peer Review: The appropriate GPRA metric for research. Science 277: 651–652.

Kostoff, R. 2001. Peer Review: Presentation to the NRC Water Science and Technology Board. 30 October, 2001, Washington, D.C.


Maass, A. 1951. Muddy Waters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


National Research Council (NRC). 1998. Peer Review in Environmental Technology Development Programs. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 1999. New Directions in Water Resources Planning for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 2000. Risk Analysis and Uncertainty in Flood Damage Reduction Studies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 2001. Inland Navigation System Planning: The Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.


Reisner, M. 1986. Cadillac Desert. New York, NY: Penguin Books.


United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1980. A History of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Fort Belvoir, VA: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Board of Engineers.

United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1988. Consolidating the Review Staffs of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and the Chief of Engineers. Review Staff Consolidation Study Group. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1992. Civil Works Project Development Review Process. Process Action Team #9 Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 73
Review Procedures for Water Resources Project Planning References Chubin, D., and E. Hackett. 1990. Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Kostoff, R. 1997. Peer Review: The appropriate GPRA metric for research. Science 277: 651–652. Kostoff, R. 2001. Peer Review: Presentation to the NRC Water Science and Technology Board. 30 October, 2001, Washington, D.C. Maass, A. 1951. Muddy Waters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1998. Peer Review in Environmental Technology Development Programs. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1999. New Directions in Water Resources Planning for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2000. Risk Analysis and Uncertainty in Flood Damage Reduction Studies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 2001. Inland Navigation System Planning: The Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Reisner, M. 1986. Cadillac Desert. New York, NY: Penguin Books. United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1980. A History of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Fort Belvoir, VA: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Board of Engineers. United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1988. Consolidating the Review Staffs of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and the Chief of Engineers. Review Staff Consolidation Study Group. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1992. Civil Works Project Development Review Process. Process Action Team #9 Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

OCR for page 73
Review Procedures for Water Resources Project Planning United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2000. Planning Guidance Notebook. Publication Number ER 1105–2–100. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2001. Project Partnership Kit. IWR Report No. 96-R-10 (revised). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. United States Congress. 1976. Water Resources Development Act of 1976, House of Representatives 94–1702, 94th Congress, 2nd session, September 27, 1976. United States Congress. 1992. Water Resources Development Act of 1992. Public Law 102–580, 102nd Congress, October 31, 1992. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). 1988. Peer Review for High-Level Waste Repositories: Generic Technical Position, by W.D. Altman, J.P.Donnelly, and J.E.Kennedy. NUREG-1297. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Regulatory Commission. United States Water Resources Council (WRC). 1983. Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. World Commission on Dams. 2000. Dams and Development: A New Frame-work for Decision-Making. Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications, Ltd.