Cover Image

PAPERBACK
$99.95



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 1067


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 1066
F Canadian Dietary Intake Data, 1990–1997 TABLE F-1 Mean and Percentiles for Dietary Energy Intake (kcal), Canada (1990–1997) Percentile Sex/Age Category a Mean 5th 10th 25th n M, 19–30 y 1,362 2,980.2 1,992 2,120 2,436 Standard error 45.2 75 33 25 M, 31–50 y 2,371 2,637.1 1,545 1,797 2,149 Standard error 33.5 81 44 24 M, 51–70 y 2,416 2,224.0 1,418 1,546 1,794 Standard error 35.8 81 30 31 M, 71–74 y 478 2,025.8 1,213 1,360 1,672 Standard error 55.6 99 57 69 F, 19–30 y 1,456 1,890.4 1,189 1,327 1,521 Standard error 27.8 57 19 17 F, 31–50 y 2,687 1,752.2 1,124 1,217 1,421 Standard error 24.0 42 14 14 F, 51–70 y 2,481 1,543.2 932 1,077 1,268 Standard error 28.2 51 27 19 F, 71–74 y 474 1,531.3 920 1,030 1,188 Standard error 70.8 64 39 35 Total 13,725 2,168.6 1,173 1,304 1,575 Standard error 16.0 30 11 12 a M = male, F = female. NOTE: Estimates were adjusted for intraindividual variability using the modified NAS method of Karpinski K, Nargundkar M. 1992. Nova Scotia Nutrition Survey Methodology Report. Technical document #451311-001, Bureau of Biostatistics and Computer Appli- 1066

OCR for page 1066
1067 A PPENDIX F 50th 75th 90th 95th 2,810 3,194 3,679 4,050 22 26 65 185 2,548 2,947 3,322 3,537 23 36 38 154 2,165 2,530 2,949 3,167 34 42 56 130 1,994 2,311 2,730 2,976 34 46 111 84 1,773 2,054 2,350 2,552 19 19 37 85 1,658 1,930 2,206 2,395 15 18 28 91 1,498 1,753 1,988 2,176 20 26 38 78 1,438 1,638 1,994 2,252 30 45 118 266 1,998 2,554 3,072 3,353 15 20 24 110 cations, Food Directorate, Health Canada; and National Center for Health Statistics. 1994. Consensus Workshop on Dietary Assessment: Nutrition Monitoring and Tracking the Year 2000 Objectives. Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Variability for the percentiles has been estimated using SUDAAN v8.0, Taylor linearization method.

OCR for page 1066
1068 DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES TABLE F-2 Mean and Percentiles for Dietary Carbohydrate Intake (Percent of Energy), Canada (1990–1997) Percentile Sex/Age Category a Mean 5th 10th 25th n M, 19–30 y 1,362 47.7 37.9 40.2 43.8 Standard error 0.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 M, 31–50 y 2,371 47.0 37.0 39.5 43.2 Standard error 0.4 1.2 0.5 0.2 M, 51–70 y 2,416 47.2 36.7 39.5 43.3 Standard error 0.4 1.3 0.6 0.4 M, 71–74 y 478 49.2 36.5 38.9 43.9 Standard error 0.8 1.7 1.0 1.0 F, 19–30 y 1,456 49.6 40.5 42.6 45.7 Standard error 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.3 F, 31–50 y 2,687 48.3 38.9 40.8 45.2 Standard error 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.3 F, 51–70 y 2,481 51.6 41.3 44.1 47.2 Standard error 0.4 1.2 0.6 0.5 F, 71–74 y 474 52.1 42.9 46.0 49.8 Standard error 0.8 1.7 1.2 0.8 Total 13,725 48.5 38.4 40.8 44.5 Standard error 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.2 a M = male, F = female. NOTE: Estimates were adjusted for intraindividual variability using the modified NAS method of Karpinski K, Nargundkar M. 1992. Nova Scotia Nutrition Survey Methodology Report. Technical document #451311-001, Bureau of Biostatistics and Computer Appli-

OCR for page 1066
1069 A PPENDIX F 50th 75th 90th 95th 47.4 51.4 55.2 57.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.8 46.9 50.8 54.7 56.7 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.8 47.4 51.3 55.3 57.9 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.8 49.2 54.2 59.2 61.4 0.8 0.7 1.1 1.0 49.4 53.2 56.2 58.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.6 48.9 52.5 56.4 58.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 51.3 54.9 57.9 60.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.8 52.7 55.0 57.7 60.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 1.4 48.6 52.6 56.1 58.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 cations, Food Directorate, Health Canada; and National Center for Health Statistics. 1994. Consensus Workshop on Dietary Assessment: Nutrition Monitoring and Tracking the Year 2000 Objectives. Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Variability for the percentiles has been estimated using SUDAAN v8.0, Taylor linearization method.

OCR for page 1066
1070 DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES TABLE F-3 Mean and Percentiles for Dietary Fat Intake (Percent of Energy), Canada (1990–1997) Percentile Sex/Age Categorya Mean 5th 10th 25th n M, 19–30 y 1,362 33.7 26.8 28.8 31.7 Standard error 0.3 1.0 0.4 0.2 M, 31–50 y 2,371 33.8 25.9 27.6 31.0 Standard error 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.3 M, 51–70 y 2,416 33.2 23.6 25.9 29.7 Standard error 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.3 M, 71–74 y 478 32.7 22.8 24.4 27.9 Standard error 0.7 1.1 0.8 0.8 F, 19–30 y 1,456 33.0 24.5 26.8 29.6 Standard error 0.3 0.8 0.4 0.2 F, 31–50 y 2,687 33.4 24.8 26.8 29.8 Standard error 0.3 0.7 0.4 0.2 F, 51–70 y 2,481 30.8 22.9 24.9 27.8 Standard error 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.3 F, 71–74 y 474 30.5 21.8 24.8 27.1 Standard error 0.7 1.2 0.7 0.4 Total 13,725 33.1 24.6 26.7 29.8 Standard error 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 a M = male, F = female. NOTE: Estimates were adjusted for intraindividual variability using the modified NAS method of Karpinski K, Nargundkar M. 1992. Nova Scotia Nutrition Survey Methodology Report. Technical document #451311-001, Bureau of Biostatistics and Computer Appli-

OCR for page 1066
1071 A PPENDIX F 50th 75th 90th 95th 34.2 36.5 38.2 39.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 33.9 36.8 39.6 41.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 33.4 36.6 40.1 42.0 0.2 0.4 0.4 1.1 32.4 36.8 41.5 43.1 0.5 0.6 0.6 1.0 33.1 36.4 39.1 40.7 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 33.1 36. 39.4 41.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 31.2 34.8 37.5 39.3 0.4 0.2 0.4 1.0 30.5 33.6 37.0 39.7 0.5 0.6 1.2 1.2 33.3 36.3 39.2 41.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 cations, Food Directorate, Health Canada; and National Center for Health Statistics. 1994. Consensus Workshop on Dietary Assessment: Nutrition Monitoring and Tracking the Year 2000 Objectives. Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Variability for the percentiles has been estimated using SUDAAN v8.0, Taylor linearization method.

OCR for page 1066
1072 DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES TABLE F-4 Mean and Percentages for Dietary Saturated Fat Intake (Percent of Energy), Canada (1990–1997) Percentile Sex/Age Categorya Mean 5th 10th 25th n M, 19–30 y 1,362 12.4 8.6 9.5 10.7 Standard error 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 M, 31–50 y 2,371 12.2 8.0 9.0 10.5 Standard error 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 M, 51–70 y 2,416 12.0 6.7 7.9 9.6 Standard error 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 M, 71–74 y 478 11.6 6.3 7.3 9.3 Standard error 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 F, 19–30 y 1,456 12.1 7.8 8.8 10.2 Standard error 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 F, 31–50 y 2,687 12.0 7.5 8.3 9.9 Standard error 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 F, 51–70 y 2,481 10.9 6.5 7.4 8.9 Standard error 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 F, 71–74 y 474 10.7 6.2 6.7 8.5 Standard error 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 Total 13,725 12.0 7.4 8.4 10.0 Standard error 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 a M = male, F = female. NOTE: Estimates were adjusted for intraindividual variability using the modified NAS method of Karpinski K, Nargundkar M. 1992. Nova Scotia Nutrition Survey Methodology Report. Technical document #451311-001, Bureau of Biostatistics and Computer Appli-

OCR for page 1066
1073 A PPENDIX F 50th 75th 90th 95th 12.2 13.6 15.0 15.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 12.0 13.6 15.0 16.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 11.8 13.7 15.8 16.7 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 11.2 13.2 14.6 17.2 0.4 0.3 0.7 11.8 13.4 15.0 16.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 11.5 13.2 14.8 16.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 10.8 12.5 14.1 15.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 10.2 12.4 14.5 15.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.6 11.7 13.4 15.0 16.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 cations, Food Directorate, Health Canada; and National Center for Health Statistics. 1994. Consensus Workshop on Dietary Assessment: Nutrition Monitoring and Tracking the Year 2000 Objectives. Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Variability for the percentiles has been estimated using SUDAAN v8.0, Taylor linearization method.

OCR for page 1066
1074 DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES TABLE F-5 Mean and Percentiles for Dietary Protein Intake (Percent of Energy), Canada (1990–1997) Percentile Sex/Age Categorya Mean 5th 10th 25th n M, 19–30 y 1,362 15.9 12.8 13.4 14.4 Standard error 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 M, 31–50 y 2,371 16.3 12.9 13.6 14.6 Standard error 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 M, 51–70 y 2,416 16.7 12.8 13.5 14.4 Standard error 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 M, 71–74 y 478 17.1 12.2 13.3 14.1 Standard error 0.5 0.8 0.3 0.2 F, 19–30 y 1,456 16.0 12.6 13.2 14.4 Standard error 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 F, 31–50 y 2,687 16.7 12.6 13.4 14.7 Standard error 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 F, 51–70 y 2,481 16.6 12.7 13.6 14.8 Standard error 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 F, 71–74 y 474 16.9 13.1 13.6 14.7 Standard error 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 Total 13,725 16.4 12.8 13.5 14.5 Standard error 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 a M = male, F = female. NOTE: Estimates were adjusted for intraindividual variability using the modified NAS method of Karpinski K, Nargundkar M. 1992. Nova Scotia Nutrition Survey Methodology Report. Technical document #451311-001, Bureau of Biostatistics and Computer Appli-

OCR for page 1066
1075 A PPENDIX F 50th 75th 90th 95th 15.3 16.3 17.3 18.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 15.8 17.0 18.2 19.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 16.0 17.5 18.9 20.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.7 15.8 17.6 20.6 22.2 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.1 15.5 16.4 17.5 18.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 15.8 17.2 18.6 19.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 15.9 17.4 18.8 19.6 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 16.0 17.4 19.1 20.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 15.7 17.0 18.4 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 cations, Food Directorate, Health Canada; and National Center for Health Statistics. 1994. Consensus Workshop on Dietary Assessment: Nutrition Monitoring and Tracking the Year 2000 Objectives. Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Variability for the percentiles has been estimated using SUDAAN v8.0, Taylor linearization method.