Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 1066
F
Canadian Dietary Intake Data,
1990–1997
TABLE F-1 Mean and Percentiles for Dietary Energy Intake
(kcal), Canada (1990–1997)
Percentile
Sex/Age Category a Mean 5th 10th 25th
n
M, 19–30 y 1,362 2,980.2 1,992 2,120 2,436
Standard error 45.2 75 33 25
M, 31–50 y 2,371 2,637.1 1,545 1,797 2,149
Standard error 33.5 81 44 24
M, 51–70 y 2,416 2,224.0 1,418 1,546 1,794
Standard error 35.8 81 30 31
M, 71–74 y 478 2,025.8 1,213 1,360 1,672
Standard error 55.6 99 57 69
F, 19–30 y 1,456 1,890.4 1,189 1,327 1,521
Standard error 27.8 57 19 17
F, 31–50 y 2,687 1,752.2 1,124 1,217 1,421
Standard error 24.0 42 14 14
F, 51–70 y 2,481 1,543.2 932 1,077 1,268
Standard error 28.2 51 27 19
F, 71–74 y 474 1,531.3 920 1,030 1,188
Standard error 70.8 64 39 35
Total 13,725 2,168.6 1,173 1,304 1,575
Standard error 16.0 30 11 12
a M = male, F = female.
NOTE: Estimates were adjusted for intraindividual variability using the modified NAS
method of Karpinski K, Nargundkar M. 1992. Nova Scotia Nutrition Survey Methodology
Report. Technical document #451311-001, Bureau of Biostatistics and Computer Appli-
1066
OCR for page 1067
1067
A PPENDIX F
50th 75th 90th 95th
2,810 3,194 3,679 4,050
22 26 65 185
2,548 2,947 3,322 3,537
23 36 38 154
2,165 2,530 2,949 3,167
34 42 56 130
1,994 2,311 2,730 2,976
34 46 111 84
1,773 2,054 2,350 2,552
19 19 37 85
1,658 1,930 2,206 2,395
15 18 28 91
1,498 1,753 1,988 2,176
20 26 38 78
1,438 1,638 1,994 2,252
30 45 118 266
1,998 2,554 3,072 3,353
15 20 24 110
cations, Food Directorate, Health Canada; and National Center for Health Statistics.
1994. Consensus Workshop on Dietary Assessment: Nutrition Monitoring and Tracking the Year
2000 Objectives. Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Variability
for the percentiles has been estimated using SUDAAN v8.0, Taylor linearization method.
OCR for page 1068
1068 DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES
TABLE F-2 Mean and Percentiles for Dietary Carbohydrate
Intake (Percent of Energy), Canada (1990–1997)
Percentile
Sex/Age Category a Mean 5th 10th 25th
n
M, 19–30 y 1,362 47.7 37.9 40.2 43.8
Standard error 0.4 0.9 0.5 0.3
M, 31–50 y 2,371 47.0 37.0 39.5 43.2
Standard error 0.4 1.2 0.5 0.2
M, 51–70 y 2,416 47.2 36.7 39.5 43.3
Standard error 0.4 1.3 0.6 0.4
M, 71–74 y 478 49.2 36.5 38.9 43.9
Standard error 0.8 1.7 1.0 1.0
F, 19–30 y 1,456 49.6 40.5 42.6 45.7
Standard error 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.3
F, 31–50 y 2,687 48.3 38.9 40.8 45.2
Standard error 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.3
F, 51–70 y 2,481 51.6 41.3 44.1 47.2
Standard error 0.4 1.2 0.6 0.5
F, 71–74 y 474 52.1 42.9 46.0 49.8
Standard error 0.8 1.7 1.2 0.8
Total 13,725 48.5 38.4 40.8 44.5
Standard error 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.2
a M = male, F = female.
NOTE: Estimates were adjusted for intraindividual variability using the modified NAS
method of Karpinski K, Nargundkar M. 1992. Nova Scotia Nutrition Survey Methodology
Report. Technical document #451311-001, Bureau of Biostatistics and Computer Appli-
OCR for page 1069
1069
A PPENDIX F
50th 75th 90th 95th
47.4 51.4 55.2 57.0
0.3 0.3 0.4 0.8
46.9 50.8 54.7 56.7
0.3 0.4 0.4 0.8
47.4 51.3 55.3 57.9
0.4 0.3 0.4 0.8
49.2 54.2 59.2 61.4
0.8 0.7 1.1 1.0
49.4 53.2 56.2 58.2
0.3 0.2 0.4 0.6
48.9 52.5 56.4 58.4
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6
51.3 54.9 57.9 60.0
0.3 0.3 0.4 0.8
52.7 55.0 57.7 60.4
0.4 0.5 0.6 1.4
48.6 52.6 56.1 58.2
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5
cations, Food Directorate, Health Canada; and National Center for Health Statistics.
1994. Consensus Workshop on Dietary Assessment: Nutrition Monitoring and Tracking the Year
2000 Objectives. Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Variability
for the percentiles has been estimated using SUDAAN v8.0, Taylor linearization method.
OCR for page 1070
1070 DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES
TABLE F-3 Mean and Percentiles for Dietary Fat Intake
(Percent of Energy), Canada (1990–1997)
Percentile
Sex/Age Categorya Mean 5th 10th 25th
n
M, 19–30 y 1,362 33.7 26.8 28.8 31.7
Standard error 0.3 1.0 0.4 0.2
M, 31–50 y 2,371 33.8 25.9 27.6 31.0
Standard error 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.3
M, 51–70 y 2,416 33.2 23.6 25.9 29.7
Standard error 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.3
M, 71–74 y 478 32.7 22.8 24.4 27.9
Standard error 0.7 1.1 0.8 0.8
F, 19–30 y 1,456 33.0 24.5 26.8 29.6
Standard error 0.3 0.8 0.4 0.2
F, 31–50 y 2,687 33.4 24.8 26.8 29.8
Standard error 0.3 0.7 0.4 0.2
F, 51–70 y 2,481 30.8 22.9 24.9 27.8
Standard error 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.3
F, 71–74 y 474 30.5 21.8 24.8 27.1
Standard error 0.7 1.2 0.7 0.4
Total 13,725 33.1 24.6 26.7 29.8
Standard error 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.1
a M = male, F = female.
NOTE: Estimates were adjusted for intraindividual variability using the modified NAS
method of Karpinski K, Nargundkar M. 1992. Nova Scotia Nutrition Survey Methodology
Report. Technical document #451311-001, Bureau of Biostatistics and Computer Appli-
OCR for page 1071
1071
A PPENDIX F
50th 75th 90th 95th
34.2 36.5 38.2 39.5
0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5
33.9 36.8 39.6 41.5
0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6
33.4 36.6 40.1 42.0
0.2 0.4 0.4 1.1
32.4 36.8 41.5 43.1
0.5 0.6 0.6 1.0
33.1 36.4 39.1 40.7
0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6
33.1 36. 39.4 41.5
0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6
31.2 34.8 37.5 39.3
0.4 0.2 0.4 1.0
30.5 33.6 37.0 39.7
0.5 0.6 1.2 1.2
33.3 36.3 39.2 41.0
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5
cations, Food Directorate, Health Canada; and National Center for Health Statistics.
1994. Consensus Workshop on Dietary Assessment: Nutrition Monitoring and Tracking the Year
2000 Objectives. Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Variability
for the percentiles has been estimated using SUDAAN v8.0, Taylor linearization method.
OCR for page 1072
1072 DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES
TABLE F-4 Mean and Percentages for Dietary Saturated Fat
Intake (Percent of Energy), Canada (1990–1997)
Percentile
Sex/Age Categorya Mean 5th 10th 25th
n
M, 19–30 y 1,362 12.4 8.6 9.5 10.7
Standard error 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1
M, 31–50 y 2,371 12.2 8.0 9.0 10.5
Standard error 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1
M, 51–70 y 2,416 12.0 6.7 7.9 9.6
Standard error 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2
M, 71–74 y 478 11.6 6.3 7.3 9.3
Standard error 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3
F, 19–30 y 1,456 12.1 7.8 8.8 10.2
Standard error 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1
F, 31–50 y 2,687 12.0 7.5 8.3 9.9
Standard error 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1
F, 51–70 y 2,481 10.9 6.5 7.4 8.9
Standard error 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1
F, 71–74 y 474 10.7 6.2 6.7 8.5
Standard error 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3
Total 13,725 12.0 7.4 8.4 10.0
Standard error 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1
a M = male, F = female.
NOTE: Estimates were adjusted for intraindividual variability using the modified NAS
method of Karpinski K, Nargundkar M. 1992. Nova Scotia Nutrition Survey Methodology
Report. Technical document #451311-001, Bureau of Biostatistics and Computer Appli-
OCR for page 1073
1073
A PPENDIX F
50th 75th 90th 95th
12.2 13.6 15.0 15.8
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3
12.0 13.6 15.0 16.0
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3
11.8 13.7 15.8 16.7
0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6
11.2 13.2 14.6 17.2
0.4 0.3 0.7
11.8 13.4 15.0 16.1
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3
11.5 13.2 14.8 16.1
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4
10.8 12.5 14.1 15.3
0.1 0.2 0.2 0.6
10.2 12.4 14.5 15.5
0.3 0.5 0.5 0.6
11.7 13.4 15.0 16.1
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3
cations, Food Directorate, Health Canada; and National Center for Health Statistics.
1994. Consensus Workshop on Dietary Assessment: Nutrition Monitoring and Tracking the Year
2000 Objectives. Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Variability
for the percentiles has been estimated using SUDAAN v8.0, Taylor linearization method.
OCR for page 1074
1074 DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES
TABLE F-5 Mean and Percentiles for Dietary Protein Intake
(Percent of Energy), Canada (1990–1997)
Percentile
Sex/Age Categorya Mean 5th 10th 25th
n
M, 19–30 y 1,362 15.9 12.8 13.4 14.4
Standard error 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1
M, 31–50 y 2,371 16.3 12.9 13.6 14.6
Standard error 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1
M, 51–70 y 2,416 16.7 12.8 13.5 14.4
Standard error 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1
M, 71–74 y 478 17.1 12.2 13.3 14.1
Standard error 0.5 0.8 0.3 0.2
F, 19–30 y 1,456 16.0 12.6 13.2 14.4
Standard error 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1
F, 31–50 y 2,687 16.7 12.6 13.4 14.7
Standard error 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1
F, 51–70 y 2,481 16.6 12.7 13.6 14.8
Standard error 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1
F, 71–74 y 474 16.9 13.1 13.6 14.7
Standard error 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2
Total 13,725 16.4 12.8 13.5 14.5
Standard error 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0
a M = male, F = female.
NOTE: Estimates were adjusted for intraindividual variability using the modified NAS
method of Karpinski K, Nargundkar M. 1992. Nova Scotia Nutrition Survey Methodology
Report. Technical document #451311-001, Bureau of Biostatistics and Computer Appli-
OCR for page 1075
1075
A PPENDIX F
50th 75th 90th 95th
15.3 16.3 17.3 18.4
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5
15.8 17.0 18.2 19.2
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5
16.0 17.5 18.9 20.1
0.1 0.2 0.2 0.7
15.8 17.6 20.6 22.2
0.3 0.3 0.7 1.1
15.5 16.4 17.5 18.2
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5
15.8 17.2 18.6 19.7
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4
15.9 17.4 18.8 19.6
0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4
16.0 17.4 19.1 20.3
0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5
15.7 17.0 18.4 19.4
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3
cations, Food Directorate, Health Canada; and National Center for Health Statistics.
1994. Consensus Workshop on Dietary Assessment: Nutrition Monitoring and Tracking the Year
2000 Objectives. Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Variability
for the percentiles has been estimated using SUDAAN v8.0, Taylor linearization method.
Representative terms from entire chapter:
estimated using
