National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$29.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists (2003)
Board on Life Sciences (BLS)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix E: Physics and Engineering Panel Summary." BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
156
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Bio 2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists

The panel listed three questions that might be asked about the content of an introductory physics course: What background is needed? How can that background material be structured into a course? What other material needs to be added in order to make the course understandable? An appropriate yearlong course of more or less conventional format but revised content is described in the main text of the report. Given the increased emphasis of that course on physical measurement techniques, dynamical systems, modeling, and quantitative analysis, the panel felt that it was appropriate to address the question of balance between chemistry, physics, engineering, mathematics, and computer science in the new curriculum. In view of the importance for biology of materials that cannot be addressed within a oneyear physics course, offering an optional additional physics course is strongly recommended by the panel. Ideas for this course are outlined below. The panel felt that the biologists of 2010—on the average—would be better served by these additions to the physics curriculum than an obliga-tory third quarter (or second semester) of organic chemistry.

Potential Additions to the Physics Concepts Described in the Body of the Report

The physics concepts listed in the body of the report could potentially fit into a yearlong introductory course. However, the panel felt that additional concepts of physics would also be useful to biology students. The following list indicates those topics they recommend adding to the curriculum in schools where biology students are able to take a four-quarter or three-semester sequence of physics. Some of these topics might also be substituted for concepts in the list found in the body of the report, depending on the interests of the students or the instructor.

  • Particle in a box; energy levels; spectroscopy from a quantum viewpoint

  • Representation of optical spectra as a distribution of oscillators absorbing and emitting energy

  • Forster Transfer; quenching; photon-counting noise/statistics

  • Other microscopies: electron, scanning tunneling, atomic force

  • Networks – Neural/chemical/genetic (This goes well with electrical circuit analysis—should also do a laboratory with real circuits. This area connects well to biological examples.)

  • Spontaneous static pattern formation and symmetry breaking (mag-

Page
156