Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$62.25
Web:$56.02
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

(NAS Colloquium) Links Between Recombination and Replication: Vital Roles of Recombination (2002)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)

Page
225
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Colloquium on Links Between Recombination and Replication: Vital Roles of Recombination

Fig. 1. Segregation of recombined chromosomes during the two meiotic divisions. Black and white lines represent homologous chromosomes. Gray circles represent cohesin; open circles represent kinetechores. Arrows represent the meiotic spindle. See text for explanation.

spores from pat1–114 haploids are viable, due to insufficient copies of the chromosomes (5, 6).

Control of Meiotic rec Gene Expression

Among the many genes induced in meiosis are those whose products promote recombination (rec genes and others described below). This induction is responsible, at least in part, for the high level of meiotic recombination. Induction of many analyzed rec genes requires Rep1(Rec16), perhaps in a complex with Cdc10, a transcriptional activator that regulates the mitotic cell cycle (Fig. 2; refs. 7 and 8). The rep1(rec16) gene was first identified by a strong meiotic Rec mutation rec16–125 (9) and later as a high-copy suppressor (rep1+) of a cdc10 mutation (8, 10). Several such high-copy suppressors have been identified, and two (Res1 and Res2) form complexes with Cdc10 (11). Rep1(Rec16) also may complex with Cdc10 to form a meiosis-specific transcriptional activator that induces the other analyzed rec genes and genes required for meiotic replication. The rec6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, and 15 genes have nearby MluI sites (5′-ACGCGT-3′; MCB or MluI cell cycle box) or closely related sequences, to which Cdc10 complexes bind (1217). Induction of rep1(rec16) by Ste11 early in meiosis renders the putative Cdc10·Rep1 complex meiosis-specific (10). In addition, Ste11 appears to directly activate some meiotic recombination genes, such as dmc1 (18).

Fig. 2. Control of the entry into meiosis. “Stress” includes starvation, DNA damage, high osmolarity, or heat shock, each of which can activate Atf1·Pcr1. Arrowheads indicate activation of the indicated protein or its gene or process; straight lines indicate inhibition or repression. See text for explanation.

Rep1(Rec16) Links Meiotic Replication and Recombination

That these two processes are closely connected is manifest by the phenotype of rep1(rec16) mutations. The rec16–125 mutation delays meiotic replication by about 2 h and only about half of the cells complete replication; this mutation reduces recombination by a factor of about 50 (7, 9). The rep1::ura4+ null allele essentially abolishes both meiotic replication and recombination (8, 10). These observations led to the proposal that these two events are mechanistically connected, as in prokaryotes (7, 19, 20). The connection via Rep 1 (Rep 16) is most simply explained, however, by Rep1(Rec16) inducing two sets of meiotic genes: one for replication and one for recombination (ref. 8; Fig. 2). Recent evidence, however, indicates that DNA replication is a necessary prelude to meiotic DNA breakage in S. cerevisiae (21).

Gene Products Required for Meiotic Recombination

The products of more than two dozen identified genes are required for meiotic recombination in S. pombe (Table 1 and references therein). Mutations in these genes confer a wide range of deficiencies in recombination, from a modest reduction (~3-fold) to near abolition (>1,000-fold reduction), suggesting that some steps are more critical than others or that there are redundant means for some steps. Some of these mutations are specific for meiotic recombination; others affect additional meiotic or mitotic events, suggesting a close interrelation between recombination and other events such as meiotic replication and chromosome segregation or mitotic DNA repair.

Meiotic Rec mutants were identified in multiple ways. A direct screen for such mutants revealed 16 complementation groups, rec6–rec21, 10 of which have been assigned to sequenced genes (Table 1). Certain mutants identified on another basis subsequently were found to be Rec; these include the radiation-sensitive mutant rad32 and the mating type switching-defective mutant swi5. Some meiotically induced genes, such as dmc1 and meu13, were found to be Rec when mutated. A search for biochemical activities relevant to recombination revealed the M26 hotspot-activating protein Atf1·Pcr1 and the mismatch repair exonuclease ExoI.

The rec8, rec10, and rec11 mutants display an unusual regional specificity (2224). Recombination in some intervals of the genome is reduced as much as 100- to 300-fold, whereas in other intervals the reduction is ~3-fold or less. The strongly affected intervals are in the central regions of the chromosomes (encompassing the centromeres), and those less affected are nearer the ends. Rec8 and Rec11 encode meiosis-specific sister chromatid cohesins, which may be predominantly localized in the central

Page
225
Front Matter (R1-R3)
Links between recombination and replication: Vital roles of recombination (8172-8172)
Historical overview: Searching for replication help in all of the rec places (8173-8180)
Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination (8181-8188)
Circles: The replication-recombination-chromosome segregation connection (8189-8195)
Participation of recombination proteins in rescue of arrested replication forks in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli need not involve recombination (8196-8202)
Effects of mutations involving cell division, recombination, and chromosome dimer resolution on a priA2::kan mutant (8203-8210)
RecA protein promotes the regression of stalled replication forks in vitro (8211-8218)
Topological challenges to DNA replication: Conformations at the fork (8219-8226)
Rescue of stalled replication forks by RecG: Simultaneous translocation on the leading and lagging strand templates supports an active DNA unwinding model of fork reversal and Holliday junction formation (8227-8234)
Formation of Holliday junctions by regression of nascent DNA in intermediates containing stalled replication forks: RecG stimulates regression even when the DNA is negatively supercoiled (8235-8240)
Single-strand interruptions in replicating chromosomes cause double-strand breaks (8241-8246)
Handoff from recombinase to replisome: Insights from transportation (8247-8254)
Break-induced replication: A review and an example in budding yeast (8255-8262)
Links between replication and recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A hypersensitive requirement for homologous recombination in the absence of Rad27 activity (8263-8269)
Evidence that replication fork components catalyze establishment of cohesion between sister chromatids (8270-8275)
Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase (8276-8282)
A yeast gene, MGS1, encoding a DNA-dependent AAA+ ATPase is required to maintain genome stability (8283-8289)
The tight linkage between DNA replication and double-strand break repair in bacteriophage T4 (8290-8297)
Mediator proteins orchestrate enzyme-ssDNA assembly during T4 recombination-dependent DNA replication and repair (8298-8305)
Two recombination-dependent DNA replication pathways of bacteriophage T4, and their roles in mutagenesis and horizontal gene transfer (8306-8311)
Bacteriophage T4 gene 41 helicase and gene 59 helicase-loading protein: A versatile couple with roles in replication and recombination (8312-8318)
Instability of repetitive DNA sequences: The role of replication in multiple mechanisms (8319-8325)
Repeat expansion by homologous recombination in the mouse germ line at palindromic sequences (8326-8333)
Stationary-phase mutation in the bacterial chromosome: Recombination protein and DNA polymerase IV dependence (8334-8341)
Managing DNA polymerases: Coordinating DNA replication, DNA repair, and DNA recombination (8342-8349)
Roles of DNA polymerases V and II in SOS-induced error-prone and error-free repair in Escherichia coli (8350-8354)
Accuracy of lesion bypass by yeast and human DNA polymerase n (8355-8360)
ATP bound to the orgin recognition complex is important for preRC formation (8361-8367)
Creating a dynamic picture of the sliding clamp during T4 DNA polymerases holoenzyme assembly by using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (8368-8375)
Interaction of the ß sliding clamp with MutS, ligase, and DNA polymerase I (8376-8380)
Defining the roles of individual residues in the single-stranded DNA binding site of PcrA helicase (8381-8387)
Homologous DNA recombination in vertebrate cells (8388-8394)
Meiotic recombination and chromosome segregation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (8395-8402)
Manipulating the mammalian genome by homologous recombination (8403-8410)
Assembly of RecA-like recombinases: Distinct roles for mediator proteins in mitosis and meiosis (8411-8418)
Domain structure and dynamics in the helical filaments formed by RecA and Rad51 on DNA (8419-8424)
Homologous genetic recombination as an intrinsic dynamic property of a DNA structure induced by RecA/Rad51-family proteins: A possible advantage of DNA over RNA as genomic material (8425-8432)
The synaptic activity of HsDmc1, a human reccombination protein specific to meiosis (8433-8439)
Complex formation by the human RAD51C and XRCC3 recombination repair proteins (8440-8446)
Rad54 protein stimulates the postsynaptic phase of Rad51 protein-mediated DNA strand exchange (8447-8453)
The architecture of the human Rad54-DNA complex provides evidence for protein translocation along DNA (8454-8460)
DNA replication meets genetic exchange: Chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination (8461-8468)
Colloquium Program (8469-8471)