The committee believes that structuring information to correspond to the core sets of performance measures across the six quality aims should provide the paradigm for research on public disclosure.

The relationship of process measures to better care and outcomes should be a defining consideration in the selection of the measures to be disclosed, and that relationship must be apparent in both surveys and presentation. However, the committee believes that because consumers make choices at the micro level of care (e.g. choosing a clinician) identifying and implementing an information infrastructure that can be used to collect provider-specific information for consumers remains an essential precondition for meaningful public disclosure of quality performance.

In addition to research on how best to design comparative reports to meet the needs of various stakeholders, it will also be important for AHRQ to better understand the potential users and applications that can be supported by the shared data repository (discussed in Chapter 4). The data repository is intended to be a more flexible tool for gaining access to quality information. In addition to requesting specific tailored reports, users might also access the data base directly and generate their own reports. A good deal of research and evaluation will be necessary to determine how best to structure and organize the data in the repository and to identify ways of assisting different types of users in accessing and interpreting data.

REFERENCES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 1998. “Strategic Plan, November 1998: Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research: Mission Statement.” Online. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/about/coer/coerplan.htm [accessed July 12, 2002].

———. 2000. “Translating Research into Practice; From the pipeline of health services research-CAHPS. The Story of the Consumer assessment of health plans.” Online. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/research/cahptrip.htm [accessed May 21, 2001].

———. 2001. “Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force (QuIC) Fact Sheet, AHRQ publication No. 00-P027 .” Online. Available at http://www.ahcpr.gov/qual/quicfact.htm [accessed June 18, 2001].

———. 2002a. “AHRQ Fiscal Year 2002 Budget in Brief.” Online. Available at http://www.ahcpr.gov/about/cj2002/budbrf02.htm [accessed Feb. 4, 2002a].

———. 2002b. “CONQUEST Fact Sheet.” Online. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/conquest/conqfact.htm [accessed Feb. 14, 2002b].

———. 2002c. “Evidence-based Practice Centers.” Online. Available at http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/epc/ [accessed Apr. 29, 2002c].

———. 2002d. “Health Care: Evidence-based Practice Subdirectory Page.” Online. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcix.htm [accessed Feb. 14, 2002d].

———. 2002e. “What Is AHRQ?” Online. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/about/whatis.htm [accessed Sept. 23, 2002e].



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement