National Academies Press: OpenBook

Funding Smithsonian Scientific Research (2003)

Chapter: References

« Previous: 3 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Funding Smithsonian Scientific Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10540.
×

References

American Zoo and Aquarium Association. 2002. Guide to Accreditation of Zoological Parks and Aquariums.


Cook-Deegan, R. M. 1997, Winter 1996-97. Does NIH need a DARPA? Issues in Science and Technology XIII:25-28.


Gibbons, J. H. and L. Panetta. 1994. Memorandum to Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. May 6, 1994.


Marburger, J. H. and M. Daniels. 2002. Memorandum to Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: FY 2004 Integrating Research and Development Priorities. May 30, 2002.

Miller, S. E. 2001. A Smithsonian jewel: Biological collections. Science 293:1433.


National Academy of Public Administration. 2002. Scientific Research at the Smithsonian Institution. Washington, DC: National Academy of Public Administration.

National Academy of Sciences/National Academy of Engineering/Institute of Medicine. 1999. Evaluating Federal Research Programs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Academy of Sciences/National Academy of Engineering/Institute of Medicine. 2001. Implementing the Government Performance and Results Act for Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 1994. Investing in the National Research Initiative. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 1995. Allocating Federal Funds for Science and Technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 2000. National Research Initiative: A Vital Competitive Grants Program in Food, Fiber, and Natural-Resources Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Science Board. 2000. Environmental Science and Engineering for the 21st Century: The Role of the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

National Science Foundation. 1980. NSF Circular No. 108 (Revision No. 4). Washington, DC.


Office of Management and Budget. 2002. OMB Circular No. A-11. Washington, DC.

Office of Management and Budget. 2003. Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2003. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.


Pennisi, E. 2001a. Jewels in the crown II: Environment Center. Science 293:197.

Pennisi, E. 2001b. Smithsonian Institution: Turmoil behind the exhibits. Science 293:194-198.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Funding Smithsonian Scientific Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10540.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Funding Smithsonian Scientific Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10540.
×
Page 71
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Funding Smithsonian Scientific Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10540.
×
Page 72
Next: Appendix A: Committee on Smithsonian Scientific Research: Biographical Sketches »
Funding Smithsonian Scientific Research Get This Book
×
 Funding Smithsonian Scientific Research
Buy Paperback | $41.00 Buy Ebook | $32.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This report assesses whether the Smithsonian Institution should continue to receive direct federal appropriations for its scientific research programs or if this funding should be transferred to a peer-reviewed program open to all researchers in another agency. The report concludes that the National Museum of Natural History, the National Zoological Park, and the Smithsonian Center for Materials Research and Education in Suitland should remain exempt from having to compete for federal research dollars because they make unique contributions to the scientific and museum communities. Three other Smithsonian research programs should continue to receive federal funding since they are performing science of the highest quality and already compete for much of their government research money.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!