. "3 Data on System Performance: Trends and Case Studies." Freight Capacity for the 21st Century: Special Report 271. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Freight Capacity for the 21st Century: Special Report 271
MARAD. 1998. A Report to Congress on the Status of the Public Ports of the United States,1996–1997. U.S. Department of Transportation, Oct.
MARAD. 2000a. Assessment of the U.S. Marine Transportation System. U.S. Department of Transportation.
MARAD. 2000b. U.S. Port Development Expenditures Report. U.S. Department of Transportation, Dec.
MARAD (various years). A Report to Congress on the Status of the Public Ports of the UnitedStates. U.S. Department of Transportation.
Meyer, J.R., and J.A. Gómez-Ibáñez. 1981. Autos, Transit, and Cities .Harvard, Cambridge, Mass.
Norfolk Southern. 2000b. Norfolk Southern Network. Aug. 18. www.nscorp.com.
Norfolk Southern. n.d. Backgrounder: The Norfolk Southern Operating Plan. www.nscorp.com.
NRC. 2001. Inland Navigation System Planning: The Upper Mississippi River–IllinoisWaterway. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Orban, J.E. 2000. What Have We Learned About ITS for Commercial Vehicle Operations? Status, Challenges, and Benefits of CVISN Level 1 Deployment. In What Have WeLearned About Intelligent Transportation Systems (J.M. Sussman, ed.), FHWA, Dec.
Oum, T.H., W.G. Waters II, and C. Yu. 1999. A Survey of Productivity and Efficiency Measurement in Rail Transport. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 33, Part 1, Jan., pp. 9–42.
Phillips, D. 1999. It Could Be Worse, but It Ain’t “Service.” Trains, Sept.
Phillips, D. 2000. With So Much Water, Who Needs Railroads? Trains, Oct., pp. 14–15.
PrePass. n.d. PrePass, a Nationwide Weigh Station Bypass Service. www.prepass.com.
Prince, T. 2001. Chicago Intermodal Problem. American Shipper, Jan., pp. 67–70.
PSRC. 1999b. The FAST Corridor and the 2001 MTP Update—A Corridor Planning and Action Strategy. Regional View, Sept. www.psrc.org/view.
Roop, S. S., and S. K. Mather. 1997. Development of a Computer Model for Multimodal,Multicriteria Transportation Investment Analysis: Final Report. Summary Report on the Washington State FAST Project. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Dec.
SCAG. 2000. The State of the Region 2000.
Shaw, P.L. 1992. Seaport–Surface Transportation Access and Urban TransportationCongestion.Working Paper 116. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, Aug.
Skamris, M.K., and B. Flyvbjerg. 1996. Accuracy of Traffic Forecasts and Cost Estimates on Large Transportation Projects. In Transportation Research Record 1518, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 65–69.
Small, K.A., C. Winston, and C.A. Evans. 1989. Road Work: A New Highway Pricing andInvestment Policy. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
Smallen, D. 1998. Intermodal Connectors: NHS Catches Up to the 1990s. Public Roads, May–June.
TransTech Management, Inc. Forthcoming. Environmental Streamlining: A Report on DelaysAssociated with the Categorical Exclusions and Environmental Assessment Processes.
TRB. 1996. Special Report 246: Paying Our Way: Estimating Marginal Social Costs ofFreight Transportation. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.