National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 Findings and Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×

REFERENCES

Agrawala, S. (1998a). “Context and early origins of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.” Climatic Change, 39(4):605–620.

Agrawala, S. (1998b). “Structural and process history of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.” Climatic Change, 39(4):621–642.

Andresen, S., Skodvin, T., Underdal, A. and Wettstad, J. eds. (2000), Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes, Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK.

Auer, M. (1998). “Colleagues or Combatants? Experts as Environmental Diplomats,” International Negotiation, 3(2):267–287.


Benedick, R.E. (1991). Ozone diplomacy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Biermann, F. (2000). Science as Power in International Environmental Negotiations: Global Environmental Assessments Between North and South. ENRP Discussion Paper 2000–17. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. Bolin, B. (1994). “Science and policy making.” Ambio 23(1).

Biermann, F. (2002). “Institutions for Scientific Advice: Global Environmental Assessments and Their Influence in Developing Countries,” Global Governance, 8(2):195–219.

Binswanger, H. (2001). “Technological Progress and Sustainable Development: What about the Rebound Effect?” Ecological Economics, Vol. 36, pp. 119–132

Bolin, B. (1994). “Sciebce and Policy Making.” Ambio, Vol, 23, No. 1.

Boyer, S. (2000). Conference Diplomacy and UN Rules of Procedure. Paper Presented at the Miami Workshop on Negotiation Skills for Climate Issues, July 24, Miami, FL.

Braithway, J. and Drahos, P. (2000). Global Business Regulation. Cambridge, UK. Cambridge University Press.


Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government. (1992). International Environmental Research and Assessment: Proposals for Better Organization and Decision Making. New York: Carnegie Corporation.

Chasek, P.S. (2001a). Earth Negotiations: Analyzing Thirty Years of Environmental Diplomacy. Tokyo, Japan and New York: United Nations University Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×

Chasek, P.S. (2001b). “Scientific Uncertainty in Environmental Negotiations” in H.-W. Jeong, ed. Global Environmental Policies. London, UK: Palgrave.

Chayes, A. and Chayes, A.H. (1995). The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Conca, K., Alberty, M. and Dabelko, G. (1995). Green Planet Blues: Environmental Politics from Stockholm to Rio. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Corell, E. (1999a). “The Negotiable Desert: Expert Knowledge in the Negotiations of the Convention to Combat Desertification. PhD Dissertation.” Department of Water and Environmental Studies, Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden.

Correll, E. (1999b). “Non-State Actor Influence in the Negotiations of the Convention to Combat Desertification,” International Negotiation, Vol. 4, pp. 197–223.

Curlie, M. and Andresen, S. (2002). “International Trade in Endangered Species: The CITES Regime,” in Miles, Edward L., Underdal, A., Andresen, S., Wettestad, J., Skjærseth, J., and Carlin, E. (2002). Eds. Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press, pp. 357–379.

Davies, A. (1990). Forty Years of Progress and Achievement—A Historic Review of WMO. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva.

Dowdeswell, E. (2001). “A Global Dialogue: Avoiding a Genomics Divide.” Paper Prepared for the Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.


Ezrahi, Y. (1990). The Decent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


Fleagle, R.G. (1994). Global environmental change: Interactions of science, policy and politics in the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Fritz, J. (2000). Second Report on the International Advisory Process on the Environment and Sustainable Development. UN System-Wide Earthwatch Coordination, United Nations Environment Programme, Geneva.


GEF (2002). Adding Value to STAP Contributions to GEF Operations. GEF Council Meeting, May 15–17, 2002. Global Environment Facility, Washington, DC.

Golden, W.T. (1991). Worldwide Science and Technology Advice to the Highest Levels of Governments. New York: Pergamon Press.

Gosovic, B. (1992). The Quest for World Environmental Cooperation: The Case of the UN Global Environment Monitoring System. London, UK and New York: Routledge.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×

Guagitsch, H. (2002). “Scientific Aspects of the Biosafety Debate,” in Bail, C., Falkner, R., and Marquard, H., eds. (2002). The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade and Biotechnology with Environment and Development? London, UK: Earthscan Publishing and Royal Institute of International Affairs, pp. 83–91.

Gupta, A. (2000). “Governing Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms: The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,” Environment, 42(4):22–33.

Haas, P.M. (1992). “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization, 46(1):1–37.

Haas, P.M., Keohane, R. and Levy, M. (1993). Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press.

Heywood, V. and Watson, R. (1995), Global Biodiversity Outlook, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,

Hisschemöller, M. Hoppe, R., Dunn, W. and Ravetz, J. (2001). Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis. New Brunswick, NJ and London, UK: Transaction Publishers. (Policy Studies Review Annual, Vol. 12)

Hoppe, R. (1999). “Policy Analysis, Science and Politics: From ‘Speaking Truth to Power’ to ‘Making Sense Together’,” Science and Public Policy, 26(3):201–210.


Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001), Third Assessment Report, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva.


Jasanoff, S. and Wynne, B. (1998). “Science and Decisionmaking,” in Rayner, S. and Malone, E.L. eds. Human Choices and Climate Change. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.

Juma, C. (2000). “The UN’s Role in the New Diplomacy,” Issues in Science and Technology, Vol. XVII, No. 1, Fall 2000, pp. 37–38.

Juma, C. (2002a). Science and Technology Diplomacy: Concepts and Elements of Work Program. Report Prepared for the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva.

Juma, C. (2002b). “The Global Sustainability Challenge: From Agreement to Action,” International Journal of Environmental Issues, 2(1/2):1–14.

Juma, C. and Henne, G. (1997). “Science and Technology in the Convention on Biological Diversity,” in Raven, P.H. and Williams, T., eds. Nature and Human Society: The Quest for a Sustainable World. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 387–397.


Kaufman, J. (1996). Conference Diplomacy: An Introductory Analysis. London, UK, Macmillan.

Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. (1999). “Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics.” International Social Science Journal, 51(1):89–101.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×

Knight, A. (2000), Changing United Nations: Multilateral Evolution and the Quest for Global Governance. London, UK: Macmillan.

Litfin, K.T. (1994). Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.

Litfin, K.T., ed. (1998a). The Greening of Sovereignty in World Politics. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, UK: MIT Press.

Litfin, K.T. (1998b). “Satellites and Sovereign Knowledge: Remote Sensing of the Global Environment,” in Litfin, K.T., ed., The Greening of Sovereignty in World Politics. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press, pp. 193–221.


Marchant, G. (2002), “Biotechnology and the Precautionary Principle: Right Question, Wrong Answer,” International Journal of Biotechnology, 4(l):34–45.

Marton-Lefevre, J. (1994), “The Role of the Scientific Community in the Preparation of and Follow-up to UNCED,” in Spector, B., Sjostedt, G. and Zartman, I.W. eds. Negotiating International Regimes: Lessons from the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. London, UK: Graham and Trotman.

Miles, E.L., Underdal, A., Andresen, S., Wettestad, J., Skjærseth, J., and Carlin, E. eds. (2002). Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press.

Mitchell, R.B. (1998). “Forms of Discourse/Norms of Sovereignty: Interests, Science, and Morality in the Regulation of Whaling,” in Litfin, K., ed., The Greening of Sovereignty in World Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 141–171.


National Research Council (1994). Joint Statement, Population Summit of the World’s Scientific Academies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994, and, Population—the complex reality. London: The Royal Society.

National Research Council (1995). Standards, Conformity Assessment, and Trade: Into the 21stCentury. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (1999a). Our Common Journey: A Transition Toward Sustainability. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (1999b), The Pervasive Role of Science, Technology, and Health in Foreign Policy: Imperatives for the Department of State. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2000). Incorporating Science, Economics, and Sociology in Developing Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards in International Trade. Proceedings of a Conference. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×

National Research Council (2002). Down to Earth: Geographical Information for Sustainable Development in Africa.” Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Parson, E.A. (Forthcoming). Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Posey, D. ed., (1999). Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity. London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publishers.


Ramsar Bureau (2002). Modus Operandi of the Scientific and Technical Review Panel. Draft Resolution. 8th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971), Ramsar Bureau, Grand, Switzerland.

Raustiala, K. (1997). “States, NGOs and International Environmental Institutions.” International Studies Quarterly, 41, 719–740.

Ravetz, J. (2001). “Viewpoint: Science Advice in the Knowledge Economy,” Science and Public Policy, 28 (5):389–393.


Sagasti, F. (1984). “Reflections on the United Nations Conference on Science and Technology for Development,” in Morehouse, W. Ed., Third World Panacea or Global Boondoggle: The UN Conference on Science and Technology for Development Revisited, Lund, Research Policy Institute, Discussion Paper No. 159, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden.

Sagasti, F. 1999. Science and Technology in the United Nations System: An Overview, Paper Prepared for the United Nations Development Programme, New York.

Saner, R. (2000). Expert Negotiators. Kluwer Academic Publisher, The Hague.

Schechter, M. ed. (1991). United Nations-Sponsored World Conferences: Focus on Impact and Follow-Up, Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

Sjostedt, G. (1994). “Issue Clarification and the Role of Consensual Knowledge in the UNCED System,” in Spector, B., Sjostedt, G. and Zartman, I.W. eds. Negotiating International Regimes: Lessons from the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. London, UK: Graham and Trotman.

Skodvin, T. (2000). Structure and Agent in the Scientific Diplomacy of Climate Change: An Empirical Case Study of Science-Policy Interaction in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Skodvin, T. and Underdal, A. (2000). “Exploring the Dynamics of the Science-Politics Interactions,” in Andresen, S., Skodvin, T., Underdal, A. and Wettstad, J. eds., Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, pp. 22–34.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×

Smith, B.L. (1992). The Advisors: Scientists in the Policy Process, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

The Social Learning Group. (2001a). Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks: A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press.

The Social Learning Group. (2001b). Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks: A Functional Analysis of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press.

Susskind, L.E. (1994). Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements. New York, New York and Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Tolba, M. with Rummel-Bulska, I. (1998). Global Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating Environmental Agreements, 1973–1992. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


Underdal, A. (2002). “Conclusion,” in Miles, Edward L., Underdal, A., Andresen, S., Wettestad, J., Skjærseth, J., and Carlin, E. Eds. Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press, pp. 433–465.

UNEP (1997), Modus Operandi of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.

UNEP (1999). Synthesis of the Reports of the Scientific, Environmental Effects and Technology and Economic Assessment Panels of the Montreal Protocol. A Decade of Assessments for Decision Makers Regarding the Protection of the Ozone Layer: 1988–1999. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.

UNEP (2002). Global Environment Outlook 3, Earthscan, London,UK.

UNIDO (2002). World Industrial Development report, 2000–2002. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna


Victor, D.G., Raustiala, K. and Skolnikoff, E., eds. (1998). The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice. Laxenburg, Austria : International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press.


Wagner, L. (1999). “Negotiations in the UN Commission on Sustainable Development: Coalitions, Processes, and Outcomes,” International Negotiation, 4(3):107–131.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×

Wilkowski, J.M. (1982). Conference Diplomacy II, A Case Study: The UN Conference on Science and Technology for Development, Vienna, 1979. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, Georgetown University.

Willetts, P. (1996). “Consultative Status for NGOs at the United Nations,” in Willetts, P. ed. The Conscience of the World: The Influence of Non Governmental Organizations in the UN System, London, UK: Hurst and Co.

World Commission on Culture and Development (1995), Our Creative Diversity. UNESCO, Paris.

World Commission on Dams (2002). Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision making. Earthscan, London, UK.

World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press,

Young, O.R. (1999). The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×
Page 64
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×
Page 65
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×
Page 66
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×
Page 67
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×
Page 68
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×
Page 69
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2002. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10577.
×
Page 70
Next: Acronyms »
Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $42.00 Buy Ebook | $33.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In the international effort to advance human health, welfare, and development while better managing and conserving the environment and natural resources, there is a clear and growing recognition of the role of scientific and technical knowledge in global governance. This has created an urgent need for the United Nations to equip itself with the capability to bring scientific knowledge to inform international decision making. Given the complexity and diversity of United Nations programs, organs, and mandates, this report focuses on the main functions of the United Nations that affect international governance in the fields related to sustainable development, with reference to the taxonomy of the key United Nations organs in which these functions are undertaken. Efforts have been made to ensure that the major categories of United Nations organs have been covered and therefore the results of the review are representative of the functioning of the United Nations system.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!