National Academies Press: OpenBook

Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8 (2003)

Chapter: 3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8

« Previous: 2 Dosimetry and Exposure Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8
Suggested Citation:"3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8." National Research Council. 2003. Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10578.
×
Page 29
Suggested Citation:"3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8." National Research Council. 2003. Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10578.
×
Page 30
Suggested Citation:"3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8." National Research Council. 2003. Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10578.
×
Page 31
Suggested Citation:"3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8." National Research Council. 2003. Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10578.
×
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8." National Research Council. 2003. Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10578.
×
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8." National Research Council. 2003. Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10578.
×
Page 34
Suggested Citation:"3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8." National Research Council. 2003. Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10578.
×
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8." National Research Council. 2003. Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10578.
×
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8." National Research Council. 2003. Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10578.
×
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8." National Research Council. 2003. Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10578.
×
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8." National Research Council. 2003. Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10578.
×
Page 39
Suggested Citation:"3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8." National Research Council. 2003. Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10578.
×
Page 40

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

3 Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8 This chapter contains a review of toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics data for jet-propulsion fuel 8 (JP-8). Given the presence of hundreds of hydrocarbons in JP-8, it is impractical to describe here the toxicokinetics and disposition of each component hydrocarbon. In the previous National Research Council (NRC) report, Permissible Exposure Levels for Selected Military Fuel Vapors, the toxicokinetics of some toxic components of JP-8—including benzene and alkylbenzenes (such as xylenes and toluene)—were discussed in detail (NRC 1996). The following general principles were applied to describe the toxicoki- netics of JP-8. The major determinants of hydrocarbon toxicokinetics follow- ing systemic uptake are disposition-related physiologic measures, such as alveolar ventilation, cardiac output and blood flow to organs, partition coeffi- cients, and organ volume. Hydrocarbons with high blood:air partition coeffi- cients will be absorbed to a greater extent than chemicals with poor blood solubility. Given that most hydrocarbons have fairly high fat:air and fat:blood partition coefficients, it is not surprising that fat or adipose tissue is a major storage depot for many of these JP-8 components. For hydrocarbons with high fat:blood partition coefficients, metabolic clearance following cessation of exposure is more important than that during exposure. Given the accumu- lation of hydrocarbons or their metabolites in lipid-rich tissues, the absence 29

30 Toxicologic A ssessment of Jet-Propulsion F uel 8 of hydrocarbons and their metabolites in exhaled air, blood, or urine does not necessarily mean the absence of systemic exposure. With regard to metabo- lism, cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes metabolize most hydrocarbons by such reactions as aliphatic hydroxylation, aromatic hydroxylation, and epoxid- ation. For many hydrocarbons, alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases play an important role in metabolizing alcohols to their corresponding keto acids. Phase II reactions, including conjugation with glutathione, glucuronic acid, sulfate, and glycine, are important in formation of water-soluble metabolites. The following discussion of toxicokinetics will be limited to a brief summary of disposition of only toxicologically relevant components of JP-8. BENZENE Benzene is a minor component of JP-8 (<1%), but its high volatility, its flammability, and its moderate water solubility make it an important compo- nent of JP-8 exposure (ACGIH 1996; Paustenbach 2000). Benzene is a potent genotoxicant and a recognized human carcinogen. Dose-dependent bone- marrow suppression, pancytopenia (e.g., aplastic anemia), and neurologic toxicities can occur after high-dose benzene exposure (Evans et al. 1981; McConnell 1993). The metabolism of benzene has been discussed in a previ- ous NRC report (NRC 1996) and by ACGIH (1996). Benzene is metabolized primarily via the hepatic CYP450 system to benzene oxide, which is biotrans- formed to 1,2-dihydrodiol, which leads to catechol formation. Benzene oxide can also rearrange nonenzymatically to phenol, which is biotransformed to hydroquinone and benzoquinone. The water-soluble metabolites of benzene (phase II conjugative metabolism) are readily excreted (Paustenbach et al. 1993). Combined exposure to catechol and hydroquinone metabolites has been implicated in benzene’s genotoxicity (Robertson et al. 1991). Benzene and its metabolites have been shown to accumulate in humans (e.g., they appear in exhaled air and urine) after repeated exposure to benzene. ALKYLBENZENES The alkylbenzenes (single-ring aromatic compounds with single or multi- ple aliphatic side chains) are constituents of JP-8. Toluene (methylbenzene) and mixed xylenes (o-, m-, and p-) are present in JP-8 and have been identified as potential neurotoxic chemicals after sufficiently high intentional, accidental, or occupational exposures (Gamberale and Hultengren 1972; Boor and Hurtig 1977; Klaucke et al. 1982; Hipolito 1980).

Toxicokinetics and T oxicodynam ics of Jet-Propulsion F uel 8 31 The toxicokinetics of toluene have been well characterized in laboratory animals (Benignus et al. 1981; Benignus 1982). In rats, after inhalation expo- sure, toluene was quickly absorbed and distributed in lipoidal and highly vascularized tissues. Within an hour of inhalation exposure at 2,167 mg/m3, about 95% of maximal concentrations in blood and brain were achieved. Toluene is metabolized principally by series of oxidation reactions that lead to benzoic acid, which is conjugated with glycine to form hippuric acid. Un- changed toluene is readily removed in exhaled air. Xylene vapor is rapidly absorbed from the lungs, and xylene liquid and vapor are absorbed slowly through skin. More than 90% of the absorbed xy- lene is metabolized to methylhippuric acid, which is readily excreted in urine. On repeated administration, xylene auto-induces some P450 enzymes, which metabolize the methyl side chain to toluic acid (methylbenzoic acid), which is also rapidly excreted. Additional metabolites of xylenes are dimethylphenol and methylbenzyl alcohol (Langman 1994). Exposures to toluene appear to have an initial central nervous system (CNS) stimulatory effect; intentional or accidental high exposures are associ- ated with CNS depression (Gamberale and Hultengren 1972; Boor and Hurtig 1977). In humans, accidental exposures to xylene at up to 10,000 ppm re- sulted in epileptic seizure, complete amnesia, cerebral hemorrhage, uncon- sciousness, and ventricular fibrillation (Low et al. 1989). There are no rele- vant studies on low-level chronic exposure to toluene or mixed xylenes in JP- 8. C9-C13 ALIPHATIC AND AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS Long-chain and branched hydrocarbons that are primary components of JP-8, include n-nonane, n-decane, n-dodecane, n-tridecane, isopropylbenzene, n-propylbenzene, trimethylbenzene, n-dimethylbenzene, naphthalene, n- pentylbenzene, and n-triethylbenzene. Inhaled long-chain aliphatic hydrocar- bons generally show poor blood uptake because of lower blood solubility. They have relatively high lipid:blood partition coefficients; this can result in accumulation in lipid-rich tissues, such as brain and fat. In laboratory studies, brain concentrations of hydrocarbons and their metabolites greatly exceed their plasma concentrations. Zahlsen et al. (1993) found that C8-C10 hydrocarbons were extremely well absorbed and their tissue distribution in brain and fat were largely dependent on the number of carbon atoms. n-Nonane is one component of JP-8 and it is metabolized at relatively high rates to hydroxyl derivatives, which are con- verted to the corresponding ketone. Other important hydrocarbons (from a

32 Toxicologic A ssessment of Jet-Propulsion F uel 8 quantitative perspective) are decane, dodecane, tetradecane, and hexadecane; they are each present at concentrations of over 10% in the liquid form of JP-8. Decane has immunotoxic potential, and its lipophilicity is similar to that of hexane and octane. Decane metabolism is similar to that of nonane: it is metabolized to the corresponding ketone though an intermediate hydroxyl- ation step. Dodecane, tetradecane, and hexadecane are likely to be metabo- lized similarly, but their metabolism is not well characterized. Microorganisms also metabolize these hydrocarbons extensively. Because aliphatic fractions above C13 have relatively low volatility, they are unlikely to be present at toxicologically significant concentrations in JP-8 vapor (Sandmeyer 1981). The presence of the very-long-chain aliphatics (i.e., above C13) in JP-8 aerosol is not known. Sufficiently high exposures to alkylbenzenes—such as n-diethylbenzene, n-triethylbenzene, n-trimethylbenzene, and isopropylbenzene—can produce adverse motor and sensory effects in rats after inhalation. Gagnaire et al. (1990) reported decreased motor and sensory conduction velocities and de- creased amplitude of the sensory action potential of the tail nerve in rats ex- posed repeatedly to a mixture of diethylbenzene and its major metabolite, 1,2- diacetylbenzene (DAB). In the rat, 1,2-diethylbenzene was about 5 times more potent a neurotoxicant than n-hexane (Gagnaire et al. 1990). Spinal-cord axonal swelling with partial demyelination has been associated with DAB exposure in rats (Kim et al. 2001). The neurotoxicity of 1,2-diethylbenzene appears to be related to formation of protein complexes: reaction with amino acids of proteins to form pyrolated polymers that lead to protein cross links. PHYSIOLOGICALLY BASED PHARMACOKINETIC MODELS OF BENZENE, NONANE, AND C9-C12 OR C9-C17 ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PB-PK) models for some JP-8 components have been developed to understand the relationship between vapor concentrations and accumulation in tissue and blood compartments. When appropriately developed and validated, PB-PK models can provide a time course of distribution of a chemical or its metabolites in tissues and show the effect of changing physiologic characteristics on plasma and tissue concen- trations. PB-PK models have been applied to predict toxicokinetic parameters and to scale dose in different species. Kinetic studies have been done with representative compounds, including benzene, short-chain alkanes and iso-alkanes, and naphthalene. There is ki- netic information about the higher-molecular-weight compounds that become

Toxicokinetics and T oxicodynam ics of Jet-Propulsion F uel 8 33 less volatile and less water- and blood-soluble and more lipid-soluble. PK studies provide information on those components of JP-8, which might assist in biomonitoring for components that are found in JP-8 at higher percentages and in beginning to assess their metabolites. PB-PK models have been applied to evaluate the behavior of benzene and alkylbenzenes alone and in combination (Medinsky et al. 1989, 1995; Purcell et al. 1990). Some of the published models examine human populations ex- posed at concentrations found in the environment (Sherwood and Sinclair 1999) or at occupationally relevant concentrations in volunteers (Beningnus et al. 1998). The models all use flow-limited uptake of chemicals by tissues and metabolic clearance from the liver compartment. Interaction models rely on competition of the various substrates for enzymatic clearance in liver (Haddad et al. 2000). Another similarity in all the kinetic models is the repre- sentation of the relationship of circulating concentrations of those aromatic hydrocarbons to exhaled air. In the model, all compounds in venous blood are available for gas exchange in the lungs; this leads to simple relationships in which concentration in exhaled air is a straightforward function of concen- tration in blood, blood:air partition coefficient, total cardiac output, and alveo- lar ventilation. The models have proved successful for low-molecular-weight hydrocarbons; their application has not been established for the longer-chain n-alkanes. Robinson (2000) described a PB-PK model of JP-8 constituents that used nonane as a marker. Nonane has been considered a surrogate biomarker for JP-8 aliphatic hydrocarbons (e.g., C9-C12 or C9-C17 aliphatic hydrocarbons) in breath, and it distributes preferentially to brain. Nonane disposition was described in a PB-PK model that includes its distribution in blood, lungs, liver, muscle, and fat. The model was developed with “inhouse” F-344 rat inhala- tion data, including blood concentrations, and was validated with published data on Sprague-Dawley rats. The model was used to predict the body burden of nonane after known occupational JP-8 exposures. There was generally good agreement between the PB-PK model based on inhouse data and pub- lished data. Overall, blood and brain nonane concentrations were well pre- dicted over a 10-fold range of concentrations in inhaled air. Limitations of the model include the lack of empirical data on metabolic measures such as Vmax and Km; the information on metabolic rates (hydroxylation followed by me- tabolism to corresponding keto form); and the lack of data on alveolar ventila- tion rates. Given those limitations, the model overpredicted blood concentra- tions and underpredicted the slope of terminal elimination. The incorrect predictions appear related to oversimplifications of several tissue compart- ments and the use of only a small number of homogeneous compartments. Efforts were made to extrapolate the rat PB-PK model of nonane to predict

34 Toxicologic A ssessment of Jet-Propulsion F uel 8 results of exposures of fuel-tank entry workers and attendants. The rat PB- PK model overpredicted the blood concentrations of nonane determined in a JP-8 acute-exposure human study (Pleil et al. 2000), possibly because of the higher affinity of nonane to rat red blood cells than to human red blood cells and the lack of information on human metabolic measures and partition coef- ficients. Dixon et al. (2001) described a preliminary PB-PK model to predict JP-8 concentrations in Air Force fuel-cell maintenance workers. The model used data from PB-PK models of naphthalene inhalation in mice and rats and nonane inhalation in rats. In addition to inhalation, a pathway of dermal exposure and a skin compartment were included. For highly exposed people, the PB-PK model was generally in agreement with exhaled-air naphthalene concentrations; however, predictions for the low-exposure scenarios were grossly underestimated, especially in female workers, by a factor of 10. The model did not predict blood and urinary concentrations. The major limitation of the Dixon et al. (2001) study was the lack of appropriate human data (e.g., metabolic measures, blood and tissue partition coefficients, and diffusion rates). The Dixon et al. (2001) model predicted a rapid decline in naphthalene concentrations in all compartments after exposure except liver, fat, and brain. The model predicted accumulation in liver, brain, and fat tissues for a 7-day period that included 4-hr exposures on 5 days. Competition for enzyme does not occur only from interactions of different inhaled compounds. Interac- tions can also occur between inhaled compounds and metabolites formed in the body that require similar enzymes for biotransformation. Detailed kinetic studies with both benzene and n-hexane show inhibition of later metabolic steps, phenol to hydroquinone or methyl n-butyl ketone to 2,5-hexane dione, by high concentrations of inhaled benzene or hexane, respectively (Medinsky et al. 1989; Andersen and Clewell 1984). Recent work with another highly lipophilic compound with low blood:air partitioning and high fat solubility may be instructive for developing predictive PB-PK models for higher-molecular-weight n-alkanes found in JP-8 (Andersen et al. 2001). Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) has a Pb value of about 2.0 and a fat:blood partition coefficient of 500-600. A set of detailed studies was conducted to measure behavior of D4 in blood, exhaled air, and tissues during and after 6-hr exposures in rats. The data could not be de- scribed with a conventional PB-PK model, because there were discrepancies between blood and exhaled-air concentrations. By focusing on the exhaled-air concentrations as a measure of free D4 in plasma, a PB-PK model was devel- oped that included a pool of blood D4 that was not available for exhalation and was probably sequestered in blood lipids (Andersen et al. 2001). The ability to discern deviations from conventional models and a model with

Toxicokinetics and T oxicodynam ics of Jet-Propulsion F uel 8 35 sequestered blood D4 depended on the availability of a robust, quality-con- trolled study with multiple collections of blood and exhaled-air concentrations. No such data are available on any of the long-chain alkanes found in JP-8 in laboratory animals or human volunteers. Overall, almost all recently developed PB-PK models of various JP-8 components based on nonane or naphthalene do not predict accurately the JP- 8 or component concentrations in blood, breath, or tissue. Given that most JP-8 components have a propensity to accumulate in lipid-rich tissues, there is a need for more accurate PB-PK models that can predict tissue concen- trations of important classes of JP-8 components. Such data are critical in assessing the long-term safety of JP-8 occupational exposure. TOXICOKINETICS-RELATED INTERACTIONS AMONG HYDROCARBON FUEL COMPONENTS With over 200 hydrocarbons present in JP-8, there is the possibility of toxicokinetics- and toxicodynamics-related antagonistic, additive, and synergis- tic interactions among various hydrocarbon components. The toxicokinetic parameters of individual chemicals in a complex mixture such as JP-8 are very different from the toxicokinetic profiles of individual chemicals. Chemical- chemical interactions may be related to mutual induction of competing meta- bolic and elimination pathways or mutual inhibition of absorption, distribu- tion, metabolism, and excretion. Similar CYP450 enzymes and phase II conju- gative metabolic pathways metabolize many alkane hydrocarbons (NRC 1996). Depending on the Km and Vmax for the metabolism of individual chemi- cals, competitive metabolic interactions can result in lower or higher concen- trations of chemicals and their metabolites. For example, toluene inhibits the oxidative metabolism of benzene and reduces blood and bone marrow toxicity of benzene (Purcell et al. 1990). Tardif et al. (1992) evaluated dose-dependent interactions between toluene and xylene. The combined exposure to toluene and xylene resulted in lower amounts of urinary hippuric acid (20-30%) and methylhippuric acid (4-40%) than exposure to the individual agents. The greatest reductions were observed in the group exposed to both toluene and xylene at 150 ppm. The blood and brain concentrations of both toluene and xylene were 230-500% higher than the concentrations following equivalent exposures to the individual chemicals alone. A similar interaction was ob- served after repeated exposure. Those interactions were probably related to competitive and mutual inhibition of oxidative and conjugative metabolism by both xylene and toluene inasmuch as the two compounds use similar meta- bolic pathways.

36 Toxicologic A ssessment of Jet-Propulsion F uel 8 Morata et al. (1995) reported metabolic and toxic interactions between toluene and several components of jet fuels. In rats exposed to toluene and hexane for 18 hr/day for 61 days, a synergistic reduction in auditory sensitivity occurred in the toluene-plus-hexane group that persisted for 365 days. Pryor and Rebert (1992) evaluated possible interactions between toluene and n- hexane exposures (individual vs. mixture protocols). Generally, the addition of toluene to the n-hexane exposure reduced n-hexane-induced neuropathy. Perbellini et al. (1992) showed that inhibition of n-hexane-induced neuropathy by toluene was related to inhibition of n-hexane metabolism to its neurotoxic metabolite, 2,5-hexanedione. n-Hexane and toluene use similar oxidative path- ways for their primary metabolism. Although most chemical-chemical interactions related to JP-8 tend to result from competitive inhibition of oxidative metabolism, induction of metabolism can result in increased toxicity of some components of JP-8, such as benzene, hexane, and naphthalene. Dosing et al. (1985, 1988) reported increased oxidative metabolism (antipyrene clearance) in personnel exposed to the jet fuel by vapor inhalation. The effect of metabolic induction by JP-8 hydrocarbons on the toxicity of chemicals that produce toxicity through me- tabolite(s) has not been evaluated. Ethanol is an inducer of hepatic CYP2E, which also metabolizes benzene. Ethanol ingestion might lead to increased metabolic activation of benzene, which might lead to bone marrow toxicity, hematotoxicity, and possibly leukemia (ACGIH 1996). The metabolic and toxicologic interactions between ethanol consumption and the various hydro- carbon components in JP-8 have not been carefully studied. Coupling of validated PB-PK models with a better grasp of the constitu- ents or metabolites associated with target organ toxicity makes it possible to assess the effects of phenotypic variants and other forms of variation on tissue doses of inhaled compounds and their metabolites. Such assessments are becoming routine, but in the absence of a model for calculating the conse- quences of the variants in relation to tissue dose, the presence of the phenotypic variations is impossible to assess quantitatively in a rigorous man- ner. TOXICOKINETIC-RELATED INDIVIDUAL SUSCEPTIBILITY FACTORS Toxicokinetic-related individual susceptibility factors may include individ- ual differences in rates of absorption, concentration at target sites, metabolic activation, and detoxification of individual chemicals. In addition, people can differ in the induction of adaptive protective responses. Genetics, pregnancy, lifestyle factors (such as smoking, alcohol-drinking, and recreational drug

Toxicokinetics and T oxicodynam ics of Jet-Propulsion F uel 8 37 abuse), age, health status, ethnicity, and prior and concurrent occupational exposures to multiple chemicals contribute to a person’s susceptibility to chemical toxicity. Genetic polymorphism in drug-metabolizing enzymes has been shown to be a major contributing factor of individual susceptibility to chemical toxicity (Wiencke et al. 1997; Snyder and Hedli 1996). Of particular interest is a re- cent, preliminary study (Butler et al. 2001; Frame and Dickerson 2001) that evaluated allelic variants in three polymorphic genes: CYP2E1 (for activation of benzene), GST M1 (for inactivation of bioactivated metabolites), and NAD(P)H quinone reductase (NQO1, involved in inactivation of benzo- quinones). A minor DraI allele C in the CYP2E1 gene contributing to high activity is present in about 10-14% of the population and was correlated with formation of DNA adducts after low-level exposure (Kato et al. 1995). The C-to-T transition at base pair 609 of exon 6 in the NQO1 gene leads to about a 3-fold decrease in activity and is present in about 50% of the population (Rothman et al. 1997; Wiencke et al. 1997). Because of a homozygous deletion of GST T1 gene, about 30% of the population does not express an active GST T1 enzyme (Ketterer et al. 1992). Overall, this preliminary study did not identify any important influence of genetic polymorphism in the above three genes on individual toxicokinetics (body burden of JP-8) or on adverse effects following brief exposure to JP-8 (Butler et al. 2001; Frame and Dickerson 2001). In a study by Soderkvist et al. (1996), a significant correlation was found with the GST M1 null genotype and the risk of chronic toxic encephalopathy in patients with a history of long-term exposure to industrial hydrocarbon solvents. GST M1 is a polymorphic enzyme; about 50% of the population expresses a null GST M1 genotype. Frame and Dickerson (2001) found a significant increase in GST M1 null phenotype distribution in naphthalene-exposed people (60.6% GST 1 null phenotype) compared with unexposed people (45.4% GST null phenotype). Despite that trend, there was no relationship between GST M1 null distribution and high or low expo- sure to naphthalene on the basis of exhaled-air concentration. That suggests that environmental and lifestyle factors contributed to an increase in GST M1 null genotype independently of JP-8 exposure. The presence of GST M1 null genotype after low or moderate exposure may predispose people to adverse health effects compared to people with normal GST M1 activities. REFERENCES AC GIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists). 1996. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Bio-

38 Toxicologic A ssessment of Jet-Propulsion F uel 8 logical Exposure Indices. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH. Andersen, M.E., and H .J. Clewell III. 1984. Pharm acokinetic interactions of mixtures. Pp. 226-238 in Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Environmental Toxicology, 15-17 Nov. 1983, Dayton, OH . AFAMRL -TR-83-099. AD-A146 400. Air Force Aerospace Medical Division, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH. Au- gust. Andersen, M.E., R. Sarangapani, R.H . Reitz, R.H . Gallav an, I.D. Dobrev, and K.P. Plotzke. 2001. Physiological modeling reveals novel pharmacokinetic behavior of inhaled octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in rats. Toxicol. Sci. 60(2):214-231. Benignu s, V.A., K.E. Mueller, C.N. Barton, and J.A. Bittikoffer. 1981. Toluen e levels in blood and b rain of rats during and after respiratory ex posu re. Toxicol. Ap pl. Pharmacol. 61(3):326-334. Benignus, V.A. 19 82. Neurobehavioral effects of toluene: A review. Neurobehav. Toxicol. Teratol. 3(4):407-416. Benignu s, V.A ., W.K . Boy es, and P.J. Bushne ll. 1998. A d osim etric analysis of behav- ioral effects of acute tolu ene exposu re in rats and hu mans. T oxicol. Sci. 43(2):186-195. Boor, J.W., and H .I. Hurtig. 1977. Persistent cerebellar ataxia after exposure to tolu- ene. Ann. Neurol. 2(5):440-442. Butler, M.A., C.A. Flugel, E.F. Krieg, J.E. Snawder, and J.S. Kesner. 2001. Gene- environment interactions and expo sure to JP8 jet fuel. Pp. 76-80 in JP8 Final Risk Assessment. The Institute of Environmental and Human Health (TIEH H), Lubbock, TX. August 2001. Dixon, K.R, E.P. Albers, and C. Chappell. 2001. A model for predicting health risk to exposure to JP8 jet fuel. Pp. 140-151 in JP8 Final Risk Assessment. The Institute of Environmental and Hum an Health (TIEH H), Lubbock, TX . August 2001. Dosing, M., S. Loft, and E. Sc hroeder. 1985. Jet fuel and liver function. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health. 11(6):433-437. Dosing, M., S. Loft, J. Sonne, and E. Schroeder. 198 8. An tipyrene and me tronidazole metabolism during occupa tional exposure to gasoline . Int. Arch. O ccu p. En vi- ron. Health. 60(2):115-118. Evans, H.L., A.M. Dempster, and C.A. Snyder. 1981. Behavioral changes in mice following benzene inhalation. Neurobehav. Toxicol. Teratol. 3(4):481-485. Frame, L.T., and R.L. Dickerson. 2001. The human glutathione-S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) polymo rphism as a risk factor for acute toxicity from jet fuel exposure. Pp. 87-9 0 in JP8 Final Risk Assessment. The Institute of Environmental and Hum an Health (TIEHH), Lubbock, TX. August 2001. Gagnaire, F., B. Marignac, and J. de C eau rriz. 1990. Diethylbenzene-ind uce d sensori- motor neuropathy in rats. J. Appl. Toxicol. 10(2):105-112. Gamberale, F., and M . Hu ltengren. 1972. Toluen e exposu re. II. Psychophysiological functions. Work Environ. Health 9(3):131-139. Haddad, S., G. Charest-Ta rdif, and K. K rishnan. 2000. Physiologically based m odel- ing of the m axim al effect of metabolic interaction s on the kinetics of com ponents of complex chemical mixtures. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 61(3):209-223.

Toxicokinetics and T oxicodynam ics of Jet-Propulsion F uel 8 39 Hipolito, R.N. 1980. Xylene poison ing in laboratory workers: Case reports and discussion. Lab. Med. 11:593-595. Kato, S., E.D . Bow man, A .M. H arrington, B. Blomeke, and P.G. Shields. 1995. Hum an lung carcinogen-DN A adduct levels mediated by genetic polymo rphism in vivo. J. Nat. Can. Inst. 87(12):902-907. Ketterer, B., J.M. Harris, G. Talaska, D.J. Meyer, S.E. Pemble, J.B. Taylor, N.P. Lang, and F.F. Kadulbar. 1992. The human glutathione S-transferase supergene family, its polym orphism, and its effect on susceptibility to lung cancer. Environ. Health. Perspect. 98:87-94. Kim, M.S. , M.I. Sabri, V.H. Miller, R.J. Kayton, D.A. Dixon, and P.S. Spencer. 2001. 1,2-diacetylbenzene, the neurotoxic metabolite of a chromogenic arom atic sol- vent, indu ces p roxima l axonopathy. Toxicol. A ppl. T oxicol. 177(2):121-131. Klaucke, D.N ., M. Johansen, and R.L. Vogt. 1982. An outbreak of xylene intoxication in a hospital. Am. J. Ind. Med. 3(2):173-178. Langman, J.M. 1994. Xylene: Its toxicity, measurement of exposure levels, absorp- tion, metabolism and clearance. Pathology 26(3):301-309. Low, L.K ., J.R. M eeks, and C.R . Mackerer. 1989. Health effects of the alkylbenzenes. II. Xylenes. Toxicol. Ind. Health 5(1):85-105. McConnell, E.E. 1993. Benzene. Environmental Health Criteria 150. Geneva: World Health Organization. Medinsky, M.A., E.M . Kenyon, and P.M. Schlosser. 1995. Be nzene: A case study in parent chemical and metabolite interactions. Toxicology 105(2-3):225-233. Medinsky, M.A., P.J. Sabourin, G. Lu cier, L.S. Birnbaum, and R.F. Henderson. 1989. A physiological model for simulation of benzene metabolism by rats and mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 99(2):193-206. Morata, T.C., P. Nylen, A.C. Johnson, and D.E. Dunn. 1995. Auditory and vestibular functions after single or combined exposure to toluene: A review . Arc h. To xicol. 69(7):431-443. NRC (Na tional Research C oun cil). 1996. Permissible Exp osure Levels for Selected Military Fuel V apors. Washington , DC: N ational Acade my P ress. Paustenbach, D.J. 2000. The practice of exposure assessment: A state-of-the-art review. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev. 3(3):179-291. Paustenbach, D.J., R.D. Bass, and P. Price. 1993. Benzene toxicity and risk assess- ment, 1972-1992: Implications for future regu lation. Env iron H ealth Perspect. 101(Suppl.6):177-200. Perbellini, L., R. Leone, M.E. Fracasso, F. Brugnone, and M.S. Venturini. 1992. Metabolic interactions between n-hexane and toluene in vivo an d in vitro. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 50(4):351-358. Pleil, J.D., L.B. Sm ith, and S.D. Z elnick. 2000. Perso nal exposure to JP-8 jet fuel vapors and exhaust at air force bases. Environ. Health Perspect. 108(3):183-192. Pryor, G.T ., and C.S. Rebert. 1992. Interactive effects of toluene and hexane on behavior and neurophysiologic responses in Fischer-344 rats. Neurotoxicology 13(1):225-234. Purcell, K.J., G .H. C arson, M .L. G argas, M.E. Andersen, and C .C. Travis. 1990. In vivo metabolic interactions of benzene and toluene. Toxicol. Lett. 52(2):141-152. Robertson, M.L., D.A . Eastmond , and M.T. Sm ith. 1991. Two benzene m etabolites,

40 Toxicologic A ssessment of Jet-Propulsion F uel 8 catechol and hyd roquino ne, produce a synergistic induction of micronuclei and toxicity in cultured human lymphocytes. Mutat. Res. 249(1):201-209. Robinson, P.J. 2000. Pharmacokinetic Modeling of JP-8 Jet Fuel Components. I. Nonane and C9-C12 Aliphatic Components. AFRL-H E-WP-TR-2000-0046. U.S. Air F orce Resea rch Laboratory, W right P atterson A FB OH. Rothman, N., M.T. Smith, R.B. Hayes, R.D. Traver, B. Hoener, S. Campleman, G.L. Li, M. Dosemeci, M. Linet, L. Zhang, L. Xi, S. Wacholder, W. Lu, K.B. Meyer, N. Titenko-Holland, J.T. Stewart, S. Yin, and D. Ross. 1997. Benzene poisoning, a risk factor for hematological malignancy, is associated with the NQO1609C->T mutation and rapid fra ctional ex cretion of chlorzoxazone. Cancer. Res. 57(14):2839-2842. Sandm eyer, E.E. 1981. Aliphatic hydrocarbons. Pp. 3175-3220 in Patty’s Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol. IIB, 3rd Rev. Ed., G.D. Clayton, and F.E. Clayton, eds. New York: John Wiley & Sohn. She rwo od, R.J., and G.C. Sinclair. 1999. New PBPK m odel applied to old occupa- tional exposure to benzene. Am . Ind. H yg. A ssoc. J. 60(2)259 -265. Snyde r, R., and C.C. Hedli. 1996. An overview of benzene metabolism. Environ Health Perspect. 104(Suppl.6):1165-1171. Soderkvist, P., A. Ahmadi, A. Akerback, O. Axelson, and U. F lodin . 1996. Glu tathi- one S-transferase M1 nu ll genotype as a risk m odifier for solvent-in duced chronic toxic encephalopathy. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 22(5):360-363. Tardif, R., G.L. Plaa, and J. Brodeur. 1992. Influence of various mixtures of inhaled toluene and xylene on biological mon itoring of exposure to these solvents in rats. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 70(3):385-393. Wiencke, J.K., M .R. Sp itz, A. McMillan, and K.T . Kelsey. 1997. Lung cancer in Mexican-Americans and African-Americans is associated with the wild-type geno- type of the NA D(P)H : Quinone oxidoreductase polymorohism. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 6(2):87-92. Zahlsen, K., I. Eide, A.M. Nilsen, and O .G. Nilsen. 1993. Inhalation kinetics of C-8 to C-10 1-alkenes and iso-alkanes in the rat after repeated ex posu res. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 73(3):163-168.

Next: 4 Effects of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8 on the Respiratory Tract »
Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8 Get This Book
×
 Toxicologic Assessment of Jet-Propulsion Fuel 8
Buy Paperback | $55.00 Buy Ebook | $43.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This report provides a critical review of toxicologic, epidemiologic, and other relevant data on jet-propulsion fuel 8, a type of fuel in wide use by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), and an evaluation of the scientific basis of DOD's interim permissible exposure level of 350 mg/m3

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!