|
1. |
Introduction |
||
|
|
1.1 |
Purposes and scope |
|
|
1.2 |
Intended audience |
||
|
1.3 |
Uses |
||
|
|
1.3.1 |
Developing a new formula |
|
|
1.3.2 |
Analyzing/revising an existing formula |
||
|
1.3.3 |
Periodic evaluations |
||
|
2. |
An overview of fund allocation programs |
||
|
|
2.1 |
History and current status |
|
|
|
2.1.1 |
An early example: The Morrill Act |
|
|
2.1.2 |
General revenue sharing |
||
|
2.1.3 |
A statistical summary of current federal programs |
||
|
2.1.4 |
Formula allocations of state funds |
||
|
2.1.5 |
International perspective |
||
|
2.2 |
The parties involved |
||
|
|
2.2.1 |
Congress |
|
|
2.2.2 |
Program agencies |
||
|
2.2.3 |
First-level recipients |
||
|
2.2.4 |
Individual beneficiaries |
||
|
2.2.5 |
Advocacy groups |
||
|
2.3 |
Alternative approaches to fund allocation |
||
|
|
2.3.1 |
Amounts specified in legislation |
|
|
2.3.2 |
Specific formula in legislation |
||
|
2.3.3 |
Goals in legislation; formula developed by program agency |
||
|
2.4 |
Types of formula allocations |
||
|
|
2.4.1 |
Single-pass, mathematical expressions |
|
|
2.4.2 |
Iterative procedures |
||
|
2.4.3 |
Matching and cost-sharing provisions |
||
|
3. |
Program goals |
||
|
|
3.1 |
Desired outcomes |
|
|
|
3.1.1 |
Close the gap between need and effort |
|
|
3.1.2 |
Treat equals equally |
||
|
3.1.3 |
Encourage spending on targeted services |
||
|
3.1.4 |
Fair treatment of communities |
||
|
3.2 |
Target population |
||
|
3.3 |
Services provided |
||