|
Reference |
Study Population |
Exposed Cases |
Estimated Relative Risk (95% CI) |
|
Benzene |
|||
|
Case-Control Studies |
|||
|
Pesch et al., 2000a |
Participants in multiple centers in Germany |
|
|
|
|
British job-exposure matrix |
|
|
|
|
Benzene (males) |
|
|
|
|
Medium |
95 |
1.1 (0.8–1.4) |
|
|
High |
70 |
0.9 (0.7–1.2) |
|
|
Substantial |
47 |
1.5 (1.0–2.1) |
|
|
Benzene (females) |
|
|
|
|
Medium |
21 |
1.2 (0.7–2.0) |
|
|
High |
18 |
1.5 (0.9–2.8) |
|
|
Substantial |
8 |
1.4 (0.6–3.3) |
|
|
German job-exposure matrix |
|
|
|
|
Benzene (males) |
|
|
|
|
Medium |
177 |
1.1 (0.9–1.3) |
|
|
High |
169 |
1.2 (1.0–1.6) |
|
|
Substantial |
68 |
1.2 (0.8–1.6) |
|
|
Benzene (females) |
|
|
|
|
Medium |
27 |
1.0 (0.7–1.7) |
|
|
High |
23 |
0.8 (0.5–1.4) |
|
|
Substantial |
5 |
0.6 (0.2–1.6) |
|
|
Job task-exposure matrix approach |
|
|
|
|
Benzene (males) |
|
|
|
|
Medium |
51 |
0.7 (0.5–1.0) |
|
|
High |
71 |
1.0 (0.7–1.3) |
|
|
Substantial |
37 |
1.4 (0.9–2.1) |
|
|
Benzene (females) |
|
|
|
|
Medium |
2 |
0.4 (0.1–1.8) |
|
|
High |
3 |
0.4 (0.1–1.2) |
|
|
Substantial |
2 |
0.8 (0.2–3.7) |
|
Gérin et al., 1998 |
Male residents of Montreal, Canada |
|
|
|
|
Low exposure |
65 |
1.0 (0.7–1.3) |
|
|
Medium exposure |
22 |
1.2 (0.7–2.0) |
|
|
High exposure |
2 |
0.2 (0.0–0.6) |
|
Toluene |
|||
|
Cohort Study—Incidence |
|||
|
Svensson et al., 1990 |
Male rotogravure printers in Sweden, employed >3 months |
|
|
|
|
Bladder and kidney cancer |
4 |
0.64 (0.18–1.65) |
|
|
≥5 yrs exoposed with >10 yrs latency |
4 |
0.85 (0.23–2.16) |
|
Cohort Study—Mortality |
|||
|
Wiebelt and Becker, 1999 |
Male German rotogravure printers, employed >1 year |
2 |
0.66 (0.08–3.27) |
|
Walker et al., 1993 |
Shoe manufacturers in two plants in Ohio, potentially exposed to toluene and other solvents |
|
|
|
|
Total |
7 |
0.99 (0.40–2.05) |
|
|
Males |
4 |
0.87 (0.24–2.25) |
|
|
Females |
3 |
1.20 (0.25–3.51) |