Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK + PDF
your price: $131.50
add to cart

PAPERBACK
list:$112.25
Web:$101.03
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $86.00
add to cart

PDF CHAPTERS
your price: $7.40
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Gulf War and Health: Volume 2. Insecticides and Solvents (2003)
Board on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention (HPDP)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Page
570
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Gulf War and Health: Insecticides and Solvents, Volume 2

E
RELATIVE RISKS FOR LUNG CANCER

Table E.1 shows detailed results1 under certain assumptions of the prevalence of smoking in the general population and in the occupational cohort. Some of the scenarios are rather implausible, for example, assuming that 70% of the population is heavy smokers. In cases where the prevalence of smoking in the general population exceeds that of the cohort, the expected relative risks are less than unity, meaning that an observed excess relative risk in the cohort would be underestimated because of confounding by smoking. Expected relative risks greater than unity, as would occur when there are more and heavier smokers in the occupational cohort, are interpreted as meaning that some of an observed effect could be explained by smoking. In the instance where all cohort members smoke heavily, the maximum relative risk that could be observed is 3.1. In general, the table shows that one requires extreme differential smoking patterns to explain observed relative risks above 1.5.

The expected relative risks for lung cancer due solely to smoking presented below. Table E.1 was calculated assuming a relative risk for “moderate” smoking of 10 and for “heavy” smoking of 20.

TABLE E.1 Relative Risks for Lung Cancer

General Population

40% Moderate and 10% Heavy

Moderate

(RR=10)

Heavy

(RR=20)

Expected

RR

40

10

1.0

50

10

1.1

60

10

1.3

70

10

1.4

30

20

1.2

40

20

1.3

50

20

1.4

60

20

1.6

20

30

1.3

30

30

1.4

40

30

1.6

50

30

1.7

10

40

1.5

10

50

1.8

10

60

2.0

10

70

2.3

General Population

50% Moderate and 10% Heavy

Moderate

(RR=10)

Heavy

(RR=20)

Expected

RR

40

10

0.9

50

10

1.0

60

10

1.1

70

10

1.2

30

20

1.0

40

20

1.1

50

20

1.3

60

20

1.4

20

30

1.1

30

30

1.3

40

30

1.4

50

30

1.5

10

40

1.3

10

50

1.5

10

60

1.8

10

70

2.1

General Population

60% Moderate and 10% Heavy

Moderate

(RR=10)

Heavy

(RR=20)

Expected

RR

40

10

0.8

50

10

0.9

60

10

1.0

70

10

1.1

30

20

0.9

40

20

1.0

50

20

1.1

60

20

1.2

20

30

1.0

30

30

1.1

40

30

1.2

50

30

1.3

10

40

1.1

10

50

1.4

10

60

1.6

10

70

1.8

1  

Provided by Mark Goldberg, Ph.D.

Page
570

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 570
Gulf War and Health: Insecticides and Solvents, Volume 2 E RELATIVE RISKS FOR LUNG CANCER Table E.1 shows detailed results1 under certain assumptions of the prevalence of smoking in the general population and in the occupational cohort. Some of the scenarios are rather implausible, for example, assuming that 70% of the population is heavy smokers. In cases where the prevalence of smoking in the general population exceeds that of the cohort, the expected relative risks are less than unity, meaning that an observed excess relative risk in the cohort would be underestimated because of confounding by smoking. Expected relative risks greater than unity, as would occur when there are more and heavier smokers in the occupational cohort, are interpreted as meaning that some of an observed effect could be explained by smoking. In the instance where all cohort members smoke heavily, the maximum relative risk that could be observed is 3.1. In general, the table shows that one requires extreme differential smoking patterns to explain observed relative risks above 1.5. The expected relative risks for lung cancer due solely to smoking presented below. Table E.1 was calculated assuming a relative risk for “moderate” smoking of 10 and for “heavy” smoking of 20. TABLE E.1 Relative Risks for Lung Cancer General Population 40% Moderate and 10% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 1.0 50 10 1.1 60 10 1.3 70 10 1.4 30 20 1.2 40 20 1.3 50 20 1.4 60 20 1.6 20 30 1.3 30 30 1.4 40 30 1.6 50 30 1.7 10 40 1.5 10 50 1.8 10 60 2.0 10 70 2.3 General Population 50% Moderate and 10% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.9 50 10 1.0 60 10 1.1 70 10 1.2 30 20 1.0 40 20 1.1 50 20 1.3 60 20 1.4 20 30 1.1 30 30 1.3 40 30 1.4 50 30 1.5 10 40 1.3 10 50 1.5 10 60 1.8 10 70 2.1 General Population 60% Moderate and 10% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.8 50 10 0.9 60 10 1.0 70 10 1.1 30 20 0.9 40 20 1.0 50 20 1.1 60 20 1.2 20 30 1.0 30 30 1.1 40 30 1.2 50 30 1.3 10 40 1.1 10 50 1.4 10 60 1.6 10 70 1.8 1   Provided by Mark Goldberg, Ph.D.

OCR for page 571
Gulf War and Health: Insecticides and Solvents, Volume 2 General Population 70% Moderate and 10% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.7 50 10 0.8 60 10 0.9 70 10 1.0 30 20 0.8 40 20 0.9 50 20 1.0 60 20 1.1 20 30 0.9 30 30 1.0 40 30 1.1 50 30 1.2 10 40 1.0 10 50 1.2 10 60 1.4 10 70 1.7 General Population 30% Moderate and 20% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.9 50 10 1.0 60 10 1.1 70 10 1.2 30 20 1.0 40 20 1.1 50 20 1.2 60 20 1.4 20 30 1.1 30 30 1.3 40 30 1.4 50 30 1.5 10 40 1.3 10 50 1.5 10 60 1.8 10 70 2.0 General Population 40% Moderate and 20% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.8 50 10 0.9 60 10 1.0 70 10 1.1 30 20 0.9 40 20 1.0 50 20 1.1 60 20 1.2 20 30 1.0 30 30 1.1 40 30 1.2 50 30 1.3 10 40 1.1 10 50 1.4 10 60 1.6 10 70 1.8 General Population 50% Moderate and 20% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.7 50 10 0.8 60 10 0.9 70 10 1.0 30 20 0.8 40 20 0.9 50 20 1.0 60 20 1.1 20 30 0.9 30 30 1.0 40 30 1.1 50 30 1.2 10 40 1.0 10 50 1.2 10 60 1.4 10 70 1.6 General Population 60% Moderate and 20% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.6 50 10 0.7 60 10 0.8 70 10 0.9 30 20 0.7 40 20 0.8 50 20 0.9 60 20 1.0 20 30 0.8 30 30 0.9 40 30 1.0 50 30 1.1 10 40 0.9 10 50 1.1 10 60 1.3 10 70 1.5 General Population 20% Moderate and 30% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.8 50 10 0.9 60 10 1.0 70 10 1.1 30 20 0.9 40 20 1.0 50 20 1.1 60 20 1.2 20 30 1.0 30 30 1.1 40 30 1.2 50 30 1.3 10 40 1.1 10 50 1.3 10 60 1.6 10 70 1.8

OCR for page 572
Gulf War and Health: Insecticides and Solvents, Volume 2 General Population 30% Moderate and 30% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.7 50 10 0.8 60 10 0.9 70 10 1.0 30 20 0.8 40 20 0.9 50 20 1.0 60 20 1.1 20 30 0.9 30 30 1.0 40 30 1.1 50 30 1.2 10 40 1.0 10 50 1.2 10 60 1.4 10 70 1.6 General Population 40% Moderate and 30% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.6 50 10 0.7 60 10 0.8 70 10 0.9 30 20 0.7 40 20 0.8 50 20 0.9 60 20 1.0 20 30 0.8 30 30 0.9 40 30 1.0 50 30 1.1 10 40 0.9 10 50 1.1 10 60 1.3 10 70 1.5 General Population 50% Moderate and 30% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.6 50 10 0.7 60 10 0.7 70 10 0.8 30 20 0.7 40 20 0.8 50 20 0.8 60 20 0.9 20 30 0.8 30 30 0.8 40 30 0.9 50 30 1.0 10 40 0.8 10 50 1.0 10 60 1.2 10 70 1.4 General Population 10% Moderate and 40% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20 Expected RR 40 10 0.7 50 10 0.8 60 10 0.9 70 10 1.0 30 20 0.8 40 20 0.9 50 20 1.0 60 20 1.1 20 30 0.9 30 30 1.0 40 30 1.1 50 30 1.2 10 40 1.0 10 50 1.2 10 60 1.4 10 70 1.6 General Population 10% Moderate and 50% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.6 50 10 0.6 60 10 0.7 70 10 0.8 30 20 0.7 40 20 0.7 50 20 0.8 60 20 0.9 20 30 0.7 30 30 0.8 40 30 0.9 50 30 1.0 10 40 0.8 10 50 1.0 10 60 1.2 10 70 1.3 General Population 10% Moderate and 60% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.5 50 10 0.6 60 10 0.6 70 10 0.7 30 20 0.6 40 20 0.6 50 20 0.7 60 20 0.8 20 30 0.6 30 30 0.7 40 30 0.8 50 30 0.8 10 40 0.7 10 50 0.9 10 60 1.0 10 70 1.1

OCR for page 573
Gulf War and Health: Insecticides and Solvents, Volume 2 General Population 10% Moderate and 70% Heavy Moderate (RR=10) Heavy (RR=20) Expected RR 40 10 0.4 50 10 0.5 60 10 0.5 70 10 0.6 30 20 0.5 40 20 0.6 50 20 0.6 60 20 0.7 20 30 0.6 30 30 0.6 40 30 0.7 50 30 0.7 10 40 0.6 10 50 0.8 10 60 0.9 10 70 1.0

Representative terms from entire chapter:

heavy moderate