Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 152
Science and Technology for Army Homeland Security: Report 1 Appendix B Committee Meetings FIRST MEETING May 14-16, 2002 Warrenton, Virginia Meeting objectives: National Research Council introduction, complete administrative actions, including committee introductions and composition/balance/bias discussions for members of committee and report procedures, discuss statement of task with sponsor, discuss draft report outline, discuss project plan and report realization, discuss scenarios, review illustrative technologies, make writing assignments, and confirm objectives, location, and dates for the next two committee meetings. Presenters Potential Scenarios Dennis VanDerlaske, ASAALT Sponsor Discussion Time John Parmentola, Director of Research and Laboratory Management DoD’s Consequence Management Role in Homeland Security Kathy Condon, Special Assistant to the Secretary of the Army for Military Support, Office of the Secretary of the Army
OCR for page 153
Science and Technology for Army Homeland Security: Report 1 Army’s Role in Homeland Defense Gregory J. Bozek, Army War Plans, DAMO-SSW, Headquarters, Department of the Army Indications and Warning Technologies Robert Foresta, Branch Chief, U.S. Army CECOM, 12WD Richard Smarjewski, U.S. Army SBCCOM Indications and Warning Technologies Fenner Milton, Director, U.S. Army CECOM ARDEC Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorates Survivability and Denial Technologies Chuck Kimsey, Kay Blankenship, Richard Smarjewski, U.S. Army SBCCOM Reed Mosher, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center Attribution and Retaliation Technologies Raymond Filler, U.S. Army CECOM C2D Larry Bovino, U.S. Army CECOM 12WD, Radar Systems Branch Edward Kierman, Project Leader, U.S. Army CECOM LTC Kathy DeBolt, Commander, U.S. Army Intelligence Center Consequence Management and Recovery Technologies Richard Smarjewski, U.S. Army SBCCOM Bob Welch, U.S. Army Engineer Research & Development Center Robert Foresta, Branch Chief, U.S. Army CECOM, 12WD National Academies’ Efforts Concerning Terrorism Douglas C. Bauer, Director, Counterterrorism Coordination, National Research Council Consequence Management and Recovery Technologies LTC Harold Modrow, USAMMDA Andrzej Miziolek, Propulsion Science Branch, U.S. Army Research Lab Richard Smarjewski, U.S. Army SBCCOM SECOND MEETING June 24-26, 2002 Washington, D.C. Meeting objectives: Complete composition/balance/bias discussions for committee members, preview additional illustrative technologies, discuss scenarios, discuss project plan and report realization, discuss concept draft, make additional writing assignments, confirm objectives, location, and dates for the next two committee meetings.
OCR for page 154
Science and Technology for Army Homeland Security: Report 1 Presenters RAND Scenarios Randy Steeb, RAND Posse Comitatus and Other Legal Issues Joseph R. Barnes, Brig Gen, U.S. Army (retired), Former Assistant Judge Advocate General for Civil Law and Litigation Preliminary Army Doctrine for Homeland Defense Larry Heystek, USA Training and Doctrine Command Role of the Army National Guard in Homeland Defense Colonel Jeff W. Mathis, III, National Guard Bureau Technology Briefing—Technology in Support of Recovered Chemical Warfare Materiel David Hoffman, Office of the Program Manager for the Demilitarization of Chemical Weapons THIRD MEETING July 24-25, 2002 Washington, D.C. Meeting objectives: Complete composition/balance/bias discussions for committee members, preview additional illustrative technologies, discuss project plan and report realization, discuss first full message draft, make additional writing assignments, confirm objectives, location, and dates for the next committee meeting. Presenters Cybersecurity Herbert S. Lin, Senior Scientist, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board FOURTH MEETING August 27-28, 2002 Washington, D.C. Meeting objectives: Discuss project plan and report realization, discuss concurrence draft, and discuss review process. Presenters None
Representative terms from entire chapter: