National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$31.25
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Adaptive Monitoring and Assessment for the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (2003)
Water Science and Technology Board (WSTB)
Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST)

Citation Manager

. "1. Introduction." Adaptive Monitoring and Assessment for the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
14
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Lord, 1993). The project then partitioned the remaining northern sawgrass and wet prairie (Figure 1-1) into conservation areas (Figure 1-2), separated by levees, designed primarily for water supply and flood control, with some provision for wildlife habitat and recreation. The Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) was created just south of Lake Okeechobee (Figure 1-2), facilitated by the construction of a dike spanning the entire circumference of the lake.

These and other projects were undertaken primarily for flood control, to support agriculture, and to provide dry land for development, and they have led to severe ecological consequences. Currently, by comparison with the earliest available estimates of the ecosystem and its components, populations of wading birds have declined by 85-95 percent; 68 plant and animal species are threatened or endangered; over 1.5 million acres are infested with invasive,

FIGURE 1-1. Historic and current Everglades vegetation. Source: Galloway et al., 1999.

Page
14