Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 108
References Agnew, S.F. 1997. Hanford Tank Chemical and Radionuclide Inventories (HDW Model Rev. 4). Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos, New Mexico. LA-UR-96–3860. Albright, D. and K.O’Neill, eds. 1999. The Challenges of Fissile Material Control. Institute for Science and International Security. Washington, D.C. Alekseyev, B.N. 2001. Ecological situation in the Barents sea area. Coll. of Abstracts of Papers at the International seminar “Ecological Problems of nuclear-powered submarines decommissioning” July 4–9, 2001, Severodvinsk: pp.20–21. Atomic Chronicle of Russia. 2000. “Bellona—Murmansk” Printed version of the News section of the WEB-site of the “Bellona” <http://www.bellona.org>, N2 (April/May). Bellona Foundation. 2002. Minatom Shuts Down World’s First Nuclear Reactor. Charles Digges, 2002–05–02. <http://www.bellona.no/en/international/russia/npps/24072.html> Accessed August 26, 2002. Bøhmer, N., A.Nikitin, I.Kudrik, T.Nilsen, M.H.Mc.Govern, and A. Zolotkov. 2001. The Arctic Nuclear Challenge. Report of the “Bellona”, Nikolai Olsens Trykk AS. Bradley, D.J., C.W.Frank, and Y.Mikerin. 1996. Nuclear Contamination from Weapons Complexes in the Former Soviet Union and the United States. Physics Today. April: pp.40–45. Bradley, D.J. 1997. Behind the Nuclear Curtain: Radioactive Waste Management in the Former Soviet Union. D.R.Payson, ed. Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio. Bunn, M., J.P.Holdren, A.Macfarlane, S.E.Pickett, A.Suzuki, T.Suzuki, and J.Weeks. 2001. Interim Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel. Harvard University Project on Managing the Atom and the University of Tokyo Project on Sociotechnics of Nuclear Energy, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Bunn, M., J.P.Holdren, and A.Wier. 2002. Securing Nuclear Weapons And Materials: Seven Steps For Immediate Action. May 2002. Harvard University Project on Managing the Atom, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
OCR for page 109
Carter, J.E. 1977a. Presidential Directive/NSC-8, March 24, 1977. Available at <http://www.nci.org/new/pu-repro/carter77> Accessed December 9, 2002. Carter, J.E. 1977b. Nuclear Power Policy, Statement on Decisions Reached Following a Review. April 7, 1977. Available at <http://www.nci.org/new/pu-repro/carter77a> Accessed December 9, 2002. Cochran, T., R.S.Norris, and O.Bukharin. 1995. Making the Bomb: From Stalin to Yeltsin. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. Compton K.L., V.Novikov, and F.L.Parker. 2000. Deep well injection of liquid radioactive waste at Krasnoyarsk-26: Volume I. International Institute for Applied System Analysis. Laxenburg, Austria. Contact Expert Group (CEG). 2000. Contact Expert Group: Working Group on Russian Strategy on Management of Radwaste & SNF, Viewed in relation to the provision of International Assistance. Agreed Summary of Work to date prepared for the WG Chairman by: Christopher Watson, Jane Smith Briggs (AEA Technology); Hans Engelmann, Jurgen Krone (DBE); Mark Dutton, Mark Gerchikov (NNC); Xavier Gorge, Philippe Michou (SGN); with participation of Evgenii Kryukov (Minatom), Lev Chernayenko (Nuklid). SWG/R/004 Final. EUR19263 EN. <http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy/nuclear/pdf/eur19263.pdf>. Cowell, B.S. and S.E.Fisher. 1999. Survey of Worldwide Light Water Reactor Experience with Mixed Uranium-Plutonium Oxide Fuel. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. ORNL/TM-13428. Department of Energy (DOE). 1992a. Memorandum from Energy Secretary James D.Watkins. “Highly Enriched Uranium Task Force Report.” February 24, 1992. Washington, D.C. DOE. 1992b. 200 East Groundwater Aggregate Area Management Study Report. Richland, Wash.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE/RL-92–19. DOE. 1992c. 200 West Groundwater Aggregate Area Management Study Report. Richland, Wash.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE/RL-92–16. DOE. 1995. Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs Final EIS, Vol. 1, Appendix D, Part A, April 1995, DOE/EIS-0203-F: p. S-2 DOE. 1996a. Record of Decision on a Dry Storage Container System, 12/26/96: p.3 DOE. 1996b. Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington, Final Environmental Impact Statement . DOE/EIS-0189. U.S. Department of Energy and Washington State Department of Ecology, Richland, Washington. DOE. 1997a. Linking Legacies: Connecting the Cold War Nuclear Weapons Production Processes to Their Environmental Consequences. DOE/EM-0319.
OCR for page 110
DOE. 1997b. Second ROD on a Dry Storage Container System, 4/16/97: p. 2. DOE. 1999a. Plutonium & Uranium Recovery from Spent Fuel Reprocessing by Nuclear Fuel Services at West Valley, New York from 1966 to 1972. Revised November 1999. Office of Defense Programs. DOE. 1999b. A Roadmap for Developing Accelerator Transmutation of Waste (ATW) Technology. A Report to Congress. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, DOE/RW-0519. DOE. 2000a. A Strategic Approach to Integrating the Long-Term Management of Nuclear Materials, The Department of Energy’s Integrated Nuclear Materials Management Plan, A Report to Congress, June 2000. DOE. 2000b. U.S. Department of Energy “Current Locations of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-level Radioactive Waste Destined for Geologic Disposal” Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. Locations Table 0100 hqcc.fh7. DOE. 2000c. Hanford’s Spent Nuclear Fuel Project: Pioneering Cleanup Progress Today for a Safer World Tomorrow. Richland Operations Office. Compact Disk. DOE. 2000d. U.S. Department of Energy, Press Release. “Energy Department Releases Environmental Impact Statement on Sodium Bonded Spent Nuclear Fuel” July 28, 2000. DOE. 2001a. DOE Manual 435.1–1. Radioactive Waste Management Manual. DOE. 2001b. U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management’s “Summary Data on the Radioactive Waste, Spent Nuclear Fuel, and Contaminated Media Managed by the U.S. Department of Energy” (April, 2001). DOE. 2002a. U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Spent Fuel Management, “Spent Fuel Database (SFD)” Version 4.2.0, March 25, 2002. DOE. 2002b. Office of Spent Nuclear Fuels. http://www.hanford.gov/doe/snf/ last accessed August 27, 2002. Diakov, A.S. 1996. Disposition of Russian Plutonium: an Overview of Russian Program. In: S.Slate, R.Baker, and G.Benda, eds. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation, 3–9 Sept. 1995 in Berlin, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Drozko E.G., I.A.Ivanov, et al. 1996. Radiation Safety Problems. 1/11. (in Russian). Egorov, N.N., V.M.Novikov, F.L.Parker, and V.K.Popov eds. 2000. The Radiation Legacy of the Soviet Nuclear Complex. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Earthscan Publications, London. Note: there is also a site on the world wide web, posted in 1996. International Science and Technology Center Project #245 Radleg. Kurchatov Institute Web Site , <http://www.kiae.ru/radleg/> Accessed August 26, 2002.
OCR for page 111
Energy Information Administration (EIA). 1999a. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Detailed United States Spent Nuclear Fuel Data as of December 31, 1998. <http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/spent_fuel/table7.html>. EIA. 1999b. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Detailed United States Spent Nuclear Fuel Data as of December 31, 1998 <http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/spent_fuel/ussnfdata.html>. EIA. 2002. Nuclear Power Generates Third Straight Annual Record. National Energy Information Center, Press release EIA-2002–06, April 18, 2002. <http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/press/press191.html>. Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA). 1975. Final Environmental Statement, Waste Management Operations, Hanford Reservation (2 vols.). Richland, Washington. ERDA-1538. Feidberg, J. and M.Kazimi, eds. 1998. Nuclear Engineering in Transition, A Vision for the 21st Century. G.Emmert, W.Kastenberg, J.Poston, V.Ransome, J.Tulenko, G.Was, and D.Woodall contrib. Nuclear Engineering Department Heads Organization. December 1, 1998. Georgievsky V.B. 2001. “Cost-Benefit Analysis of the remedial actions for the contaminated floodplain due releases of Radioactive Materials at Krasnoyarsk-26 into Enisey River”, ICEM’01, 8th International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation, September 30–October 4, Bruges, Belgium, M-5. Gephart, R.E. 1999. A short history of plutonium production and nuclear waste generation, storage, and release at the Hanford Site. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Richland, Washington. PNNL-SA-32152. Gephart R.E., and R.E.Lundgren. 1998. Hanford Tank Cleanup: A Guide to Understanding the Technical Issues. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press. PNL-10773. Gerber, M. 2001. Removing the K-Basins Fuel: Down Payment on Protecting the Columbia River. Radwaste Solutions, March/April. Hanlon, B.M. 2000. Waste tank summary report for month ending July 31, 2000: Richland, Wash.: Hanford, Inc. HNF-EP-0182–148. Heeb, C.M. 1994. Radionuclide Releases to the Atmosphere from Hanford Operations, 1944–1972, PNWD-2222-HEDR, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Richland, Washington. Heeb, C.M., D.J.Bates. 1994. Radionuclide Releases to the Columbia River from Hanford Operations, 1944–1971. PNWD-2223-HEDR. Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories. Richland, Washington Hoffman, D.C. 1994. Work on Heaviest Atom Chemistry Provides Excellent Training for Students. Chemical and Engineering News, 72 (10):p.31.
OCR for page 112
Holt, M. 2002. Civilian Nuclear Waste Disposal, Issue Brief for Congress. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. September 9, 2002. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1999a. Report on the Preliminary Fact Finding Mission Following the Accident at the Nuclear Fuel Processing Facility In Tokaimura, Japan. IAEA. 1999b. IAEA Research Reactor Database. International Atomic Energy Agency Web Site, <http://www.iaea.org/worldatom/rrdb>, updated 1999, last accessed February 20, 2003. IAEA. 2001. Nuclear Power Reactors in the World. IAEA Reference Data Series No. 2, April 2001. Ivanov B., N.N.Egorov, V.A.Lebedev et al. 1999. On basic aspects of the Russian strategy for radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel treatment—Moscow—St. Petersburg. Jardine, L.J. and G.B.Borisov, eds. 2002. Review of Excess Weapons Plutonium Disposition LLNL Contract Work in Russia. UCRL-ID-149341, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. July 11, 2002. Joint Norwegian-Russian Expert Group for Investigation of Radioactive Contamination in the Northern Areas. 1997. Sources contributing to radioactive contamination of the Techa River and areas surrounding the “Mayak” production association, Urals, Russia. Programme for investigations of possible impacts of the “Mayak” PA activities on radioactive contamination of the Barents and Kara Seas. Østerås, Norway. Kozlov, Y., Y.Kosarev, N.S.Tikhonov, and S.D.Khromeev. 2002. Management of Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel and Economic Aspects of its Shipment. 5th International Conference Radiation Safety: Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management, September 24–27, 2002: pp. 144–152. Lowenthal, M.D. 2002. Transmutation in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Approaches and Impacts. Nuclear Technology. 138 (June): pp. 284– 299. Malkovsky, V., A.Pek, V.Velichkin, and F.Parker. 1999. Prediction of contaminant plume movement from the deep-well injection of liquid radioactive waste (LRW) at the Krasnoyarsk disposal site. Hydrological Science and Technology Journal. 15 (1–4): pp.145– 171. Matyunin, Y.I. 2002. Development of Matrix Compositions and Process of Immobilization for Hard-to-Process Pu-containing Sludges of “Mayak.” In Review of Excess Weapons Plutonium Disposition LLNL Contract Work in Russia, L.J.Jardine and G.B.Borisov, eds. UCRL-ID-149341, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. July 11, 2002. Ministry of Atomic Energy of the Russian Federation (Minatom). 2000. Strategy of the Russian Federation Atomic Power Engineering Development in the First Half of the 21st Century. Moscow. Minatom. 2002. Natural environment state at the Minatom RF enterprises in 2001. Moscow. Mokrov, Yu.G. 1996. Radiation Safety Problems. 3/19 (in Russian).
OCR for page 113
Moltz, J.C. 2000. Russian Nuclear Submarine Dismantlement and the Naval Fuel Cycle. The Nonproliferation Review. Spring 2000. Napier, B.A. 1992. Determination of Radionuclides and Pathways Contributing to Cumulative Dose; Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project Dose Code Recovery Activities—Calculation 004. Batelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington. BN-SA-3673 HEDR. National Academy of Sciences (NAS).1990. Trip Report of the Visit of the National Academy of Sciences Delegation on Radioactive Waste Management to the USSR, February 12–23, 1990. Washington, D.C. NAS. 1994. Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. National Energy Policy Development Group. 2001. National Energy Policy: Reliable, Affordable, and Environmentally Sound Energy for America’s Future, Report of the National Energy Policy Development Group. Washington, D.C. National Research Council (NRC). 1957. The Disposal of Radioactive Waste on Land. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. NRC. 1990. Rethinking High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal: A Position Statement of the Board on Radioactive Waste Management 1990. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. NRC. 1996a. Nuclear Wastes: Technologies for Separations and Transmutation. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. NRC. 1996b. Understanding Risk, Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. NRC. 1996c. The Hanford Tanks, Environmental Impacts and Policy Choices. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. NRC. 1997. Proliferation Concerns: Assessing U.S. Efforts to Help Contain Nuclear and Other Dangerous Materials and Technologies in the Former Soviet Union. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. NRC. 1999a. Protecting Nuclear Weapons Material in Russia. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. NRC. 1999b. Alternative High-Level Waste Treatments at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. NRC. 1999c. An End State Methodology for Identifying Technology Needs for Environmental Management, with an Example from the Hanford Site Tanks. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. NRC. 2001a. Disposition of High-Level Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: The Continuing Societal and Technical Challenges. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. NRC. 2001b. Science and Technology for Environmental Cleanup at Hanford. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C.
OCR for page 114
NRC. 2002a. Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. NRC. 2002b. Principles and Operational Strategies for Staged Repository Systems Progress Report. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. Nigmatulin, B.I. 2001. Prospects of development of atomics in Russia and effective use of nuclear engineering complex. The report of the deputy minister of the Russian Federation on atomic energy. November 14, 2001. Nilsen, T. and N.Bøhmer. 1994. Contamination sources in the Murmansk and Arkhangelsk regions. Report of the “Bellona”, Version 1. Publ.H. a.s. Joh. Nordahl trykken. Oslo, Norway. Nilsen, T., I.Kudrik, and A.Nikitin. 1996. The Russian Northern Fleet, Sources of Radioactive Contamination. Bellona Report Volume 2:1996. The Bellona Foundation, Oslo, Norway. Nuclear News. 2002. World List of Nuclear Power Plants. 45 (3): pp. 39– 65. NWPA. 1982. Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982. Public Law 97–425. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 1999a. Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation: Status and Assessment Report. OECD Publications, Paris. NEA. 1999b. Confidence in the Long-Term Safety of Deep Geological Repositories. OECD Publications. Paris. Parker, F.L., A.I.Rybalchenko, V.I.Velichkin, K.L.Compton, V.M.Novikov, A.A.Pek, V.I.Malkovsky, and B.P.Sigaev. 1999. Analysis of long-term consequences of deep-well injection disposal of liquid radioactive waste at the Mining and Chemical Combine, Krasnoyarskii Krai: I. Normal Evolution Scenario. Geology of Ore Deposits. 41 (6): pp.467–484 (English Translation). Parker, F.L., A.I.Rybalchenko, V.I.Velichkin, K.L.Compton, V.M.Novikov, A.A.Pek, V.I.Malkovsky, E.E.Asadulin, and B.P.Sigaev. 2000. Analysis of long-term consequences of deep-well injection disposal of liquid radioactive waste at the Mining and Chemical Combine, Krasnoyarskii Krai: II. Hypothetical Scenarios. Geology of Ore Deposits. 42 (2): pp.122–140 (English Translation). Petrov, V.A., V.V.Poluektov, and A.V.Zharikov. 1998. Peculiarities of fluid transport in the metavolcanic strata at the territory of PA Mayak, Russia. In High-level radioactive waste management. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, May 11–14. American Nuclear Society Inc.: pp.68–70. Rosenergoatom. 2002. Reactor VVER-1000. <http://www.rosatom.ru/english/stations/document/vver_1000/glossary_reactor_vver-1000(eng).html>, last accessed July 2, 2002. Rovny, S.I. and V.I.Guzhavin. 2002. The Technology of Alpha-active Materials Incorporation in Glassy and Mineral Matrixes. In Review of Excess Weapons Plutonium Disposition LLNL Contract Work in Russia, L.J.Jardine and G.B.Borisov, eds. Lawrence
OCR for page 115
Livermore National Laboratory. July 11, 2002. Livermore, California. UCRL-ID-149341. Ruzankin, A.D. and S.G.Makeyenko. 2000. Organizational-and-economical problems of radioactive waste management in the European North of Russia. Kola Science Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences. Apatity, Murmansk. Rybal’chenko, A.I., M.K.Pimenov, P.P.Kostin, V.D.Balukova, A.V. Nosukhin, E.I.Mikerin, N.N.Egorov, E.P.Kaimin, I.M.Kosareva, and V.M.Kurochkin. 1994. Underground Disposal of Liquid Radioactive Wastes. Izdat. Moscow. Rybal’chenko, A.I., M.K.Pimenov, P.P.Kostin, V.D.Balukova, A.V.Nosukhin, E.I.Mikerin, N.N.Egorov, E.P.Kaimin, I.M.Kosareva, and V.M.Kurochkin. 1998. Deep Injection Disposal of Liquid Radioactive Waste in Russia. M.G.Foley and L.M.G.Ballou, eds. Battelle Press. Columbus, Ohio. Safutin, V.D., V.M.Simonovsky, A.A.Shvedov et al. 1999. A concept of SNF and RW radioactive waste management in the Northern area of the RF. Report at the International Murmansk forum. Security Council of the Russian Federation. 1994. Statement of the working group of the Security Council of Russian Federation on the results of inspection of radiation and ecological safety at the Siberian Chemical Combine and adjacent territories. Shatalov, V.V. 2002. Analysis of the quantitative composition and qualitative state of RW accumulated over the period of nuclear industry operation. Presented at the joint conference of Minatom RF and RAS, May 25, 2002. Sinisoo M. 1995 Paldiski—Radioactive Waste and its Disposal. Proceedings of the International Conference “Ecological security of the Baltic states, Nordic countries and North-West Russia”, 30 March –1 April, 1995, Lohusalu, Estonia. Tallinn: pp.81–88. Stepanova, T.N. 1996. Report of the Krasnoyarsk UGMS on control over contamination of the environment at the MCC region for 1995. Krasnoyarsk, (in Russian). U.S. Code, title 42, section 10101 (42 U.S.C. § 10101). U.S. Code, title 42, section 2014 (42 U.S.C. § 2014). U.S. Code, title 42, section 2021 (42 U.S.C. § 2021). U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 10, section 51.23 (10 CFR § 51.23). Temporary storage of spent fuel after cessation of reactor operation—generic determination of no significant environmental impact. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 61 (10 C.F.R. 61). U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 63 (10 C.F.R. 63). Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Subpart A—General Provisions, Sec. 63.2 Definitions.
OCR for page 116
U.S. Naval Reactors (USNR). 2001. The United States Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program, August 2001, Over 122 Million Miles Safely Steamed on Nuclear Power. U.S. Navy. 1996. Final EIS for a Container System for the Management of Naval Spent Nuclear Fuel, November. DOE/EIS-0251: p.S-1. U.S. Navy. 1999. U.S. Naval Nuclear Powered Ship Inactivation, Disposal, and Recycling: p.S-1, S-2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U.S. NRC). 1999. Draft Safety Evaluation Report—Fort St. Vrain. January 11, 1999. U.S. NRC. 2001. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. “Fact Sheet: Dry Cask Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel” June 2001. U.S. NRC. 2002. Research and Test Reactors Fact Sheet found at <http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/factsheets/research-reactors.html> and the list of non-power reactors <http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/list-nonpower-reactors.html>, accessed August 14, 2002 (the latter site reports a University of Virginia reactor as operating, when it is in decommissioning). U.S. NRC. 2003. License Renewal Generic Environmental Impact Statement. NUREG-1437. Velichkin, V.I., V.A.Petrov, and N.N.Tarasov. 2002. Problems of Underground Disposal of High-level Radioactive Waste and Long-Term Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Russia: Status Assessment and Position of the IGEM RAS. In Review of Excess Weapons Plutonium Disposition LLNL Contract Work in Russia, L.J. Jardine and G.B.Borisov, eds. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. July 11, 2002. Livermore, California. UCRL-ID-149341 Waite, J.L. 1991. Tank Wastes Discharged Directly to the Soil at the Hanford Site: Richland, Wash.: U.S. Department of Energy. Office of Environmental Restoration. WHC-MR-0227 Was, G.S. and W.R.Martin, eds. 2000. Manpower Supply and Demand in the Nuclear Industry. Nuclear Engineering Department Heads Organization. February. Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC). 2001. News from the Savannah River Site “SRS Defense Waste Processing Facility Leads World by Producing Four Million Pounds of Classified Radioactive Waste” WSRC-01–01. January 3. Wodrich, D. 1991. Historical Perspective of Radioactivity Contaminated Liquid and Solid Wastes Discharged or Buried in the Ground at Hanford: Richland, Wash.: Westinghouse Hanford Company. TRAC-0151-VA. Zotov, A.V., K.A.Levin, L.O.Magazina, A.P.Mukhamet-Galeev, B.I. Omel’yanenko, N.D.Samotoin, and Yu.B.Shapovalov. 1996. Interaction of Aluminophosphate Glass with Water at Elevated Temperatures. Geochemistry International. 34 (9).
Representative terms from entire chapter: