National Academies Press: OpenBook

Survey Automation: Report and Workshop Proceedings (2003)

Chapter: II Proceedings - Opening Remarks

« Previous: Reducing Insularity
Suggested Citation:"II Proceedings - Opening Remarks." National Research Council. 2003. Survey Automation: Report and Workshop Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10695.
×

Part II
Proceedings

Suggested Citation:"II Proceedings - Opening Remarks." National Research Council. 2003. Survey Automation: Report and Workshop Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10695.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"II Proceedings - Opening Remarks." National Research Council. 2003. Survey Automation: Report and Workshop Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10695.
×

OPENING REMARKS

CORK: Let me introduce myself. My name is Daniel Cork, and I am the study director for this, the [National Research Council (NRC)] Workshop on Survey Automation. This workshop is being conducted by the Committee on National Statistics of the NRC, with sponsorship from the U.S. Census Bureau. The agenda in the agenda books identifies Chet Bowie, who was going to give opening remarks on behalf of the Census Bureau; he is unable to make it, so actually we are going to have our first speaker—Pat Doyle, also of the Census Bureau—give those remarks in Chet Bowie’s stead.

DOYLE: Welcome; I’m really thrilled that you all could come today and share with us your expertise on what we believe to be a very pressing set of issues. Basically, our task for the two days is to address our rather overzealous entry into computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI).1 Automation is a wonderful thing; it allows us to basically take instruments to the point beyond which we can comprehend them. And we have certainly taken up that challenge.

We have instruments that provide a great deal of precision in measurement, and that’s excellent for the quality and the statistics we can produce from our surveys.2 It’s also allowed us—when we try—to reduce the burden by targeting our questions precisely to the individuals [to] whom the questions would be relevant.

But all of this comes at the cost of complexity, and that complexity complicates our comprehension of the instrument. It complicates the testing of the instrument. It increases the time and the resources needed up front to get started. It prohibits an interpretable image of the instrument that’s being fielded, i.e., the questionnaire. And basically it did away with the free good of instrument documentation. When we were in paper, we had a free good; we had documentation.

Now, we don’t really believe [that] the testing challenges we face are new; we think they have been faced in other disciplines. And what

1  

Computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) involves the administration of a computerized survey questionnaire by an interviewer to a respondent. The transition from traditional pen (or pencil)-and-paper interviewing (PAPI)—where the instrument is a paper document—to CAPI is the primary focus of the workshop. This focus differs slightly from related practices such as computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI); there, the questionnaire is also computerized, but CATI questionnaires tend to be shorter than CAPI questionnaires. Moreover, CATI interviewers are typically under direct supervisory control and operate from centralized call centers, whereas CAPI interviewers are deployed directly into the field to collect information and operate with somewhat greater autonomy. Generally, survey techniques involving electronic questionnaires are known as computer-assisted interviewing (CAI).

2  

In survey terminology, the questionnaire that is administered to the survey respondents is called an “instrument.”

Suggested Citation:"II Proceedings - Opening Remarks." National Research Council. 2003. Survey Automation: Report and Workshop Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10695.
×
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"II Proceedings - Opening Remarks." National Research Council. 2003. Survey Automation: Report and Workshop Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10695.
×
Page 34
Suggested Citation:"II Proceedings - Opening Remarks." National Research Council. 2003. Survey Automation: Report and Workshop Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10695.
×
Page 35
Next: What Makes the CAI Testing and Documentation Problems So Hard to Solve? »
Survey Automation: Report and Workshop Proceedings Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $80.00 Buy Ebook | $64.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

For over 100 years, the evolution of modern survey methodology—using the theory of representative sampling to make interferences from a part of the population to the whole—has been paralleled by a drive toward automation, harnessing technology and computerization to make parts of the survey process easier, faster, and better. The availability of portable computers in the late 1980s ushered in computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI), in which interviewers administer a survey instrument to respondents using a computerized version of the questionnaire on a portable laptop computer. Computer assisted interviewing (CAI) methods have proven to be extremely useful and beneficial in survey administration. However, the practical problems encountered in documentation and testing CAI instruments suggest that this is an opportune time to reexamine not only the process of developing CAI instruments but also the future directions of survey automation writ large.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!