ences in Monitoring and Evaluating Research Output and Outcomes, T. Turpin, S. Garrett-Jones, D. Aylward, G. Speak, R. Iredale, and S. Cozzens, eds. The Centre for Research Policy, University of Wollongong, Canberra [Online]. Available: http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/respubs/value/susan cozintro.htm [accessed Jan. 22, 2003].
Cozzens, S.E. 2002. The Craft of Research Evaluation. Presentation at the Second Meeting on Review EPA’s Research Grants Program, April 25, 2002, Wash-ington, DC.
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2001. ORD Strategic Plan. EPA/600/R/01/003. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. [Online]. Available: http://www.epa. gov/ospinter/strtplan/documents/final.pdf [accessed Jan. 22, 2003].
GAO (U.S. General Accounting Office). 1997. The Government Performance and Results Act: 1997 Governmentwide Implementation Will be Uneven. GAO/GGD-97-109. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
Geisler, E. 2000. The Metrics of Science and Technology. Westport, CT: Quo-rum Books.
NRC (National Research Council). 1999. Evaluating Federal Research Programs: Research and the Government Performance and Results Act. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
OMB (Office of Management and Budget). 2002. OMB Preliminary Investment Criteria for Basic Research. OMB Discussion Draft, February 2002.
OSTP/OMB (Office of Science Technology and Policy/Office of Management and Budget). 2002. FY 2004 Interagency Research and Development Priorities. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, from John Marburger, Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Mitchell Daniels, Director, Office of Management and Budget, The White House, Washington, DC. May 30, 2002.
Preuss, P.W. 2002. National Center for Environmental Research, History, Goals, and Operation of the STAR Program. Presentation at the First Meeting on Review EPA’s Research Grants Program, March 18, 2002, Washington, DC.