National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Contents of Report
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×

REFERENCES

Applegate, J.S. and S. Dycus. 1998. Institutional controls or emperor's clothes? Long-term stewardship on the nuclear weapons complex. The Environmental Law Reporter News & Analysis 28(11):10631-10652. Available at: <http://lts.apps.em.doe.gov/center/reports/pdf/doc42.pdf>.

Applegate, J.S. 1998a. Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Priorities Projects: A Forum, Not a Formula. 25 N. Ky. L. Rev. 71.

Applegate, J.S. 1998b. Beyond the Usual Suspects: The Use of Citizens Advisory Boards in Environmental Decisionmaking. 73 Ind. L.J. 903.

ASTSWMO (Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials). 2002. Letter from Jeff Deckler, Chair, ASTSWMO Radiation Focus Group to Mr. David Geiser, Director, Office of Long-Term Stewardship, U.S. Department of Energy. May 30.


Crowley, K.D. and J.F. Ahearne. 2002. Managing the environmental legacy of U.S. nuclear-weapons production. American Scientist 90(Nov-Dec): 514-523.


DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 1996. The 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report: Volume III New Mexico—Wyoming. Office of Environmental Management. DOE/EM-0290. Available at: <http://www.em.doe.gov/bemr96/>.

DOE. 2000. Institutional Controls in RCRA & CERCLA Response Actions. Office of Environmental Policy and Guidance, RCRA/CERCLA Division EH-413. DOE/EH-413-0004. August. Available at: <http://tis.eh.doe.gov/oepa/guidance/cercla/ic_rfinal.pdf>.

DOE. 2001a. Long-term Stewardship Study, Volume I—Report. Office of Environmental Management, Office of Long-Term Stewardship. October. Available at: <http://lts.apps.em.doe.gov/center/reports/pdf/SS_VolI.pdf>.

DOE. 2001b. A Report to Congress on Long-Term Stewardship, Volume I—Summary Report. Office of Environmental Management, Office of Long-Term Stewardship. DOE/EM-0563. January. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×

DOE. 2001c. Long-Term Stewardship Case Study Report, Final Draft. Office of Environmental Management, Office of Long-Term Stewardship. June. Available at: <http://lts.apps.em.doe.gov/center/reports/pdf/doc222.pdf>.

DOE. 2002a. Long-term Stewardship Planning Guidance for Closure Sites. Office of Environmental Management. August. Available at: <http://www.fernaldcab.org/FRReport/keydocuments/DOE1.pdf>.

DOE. 2002b. Preface to the Site Transition Framework for Long-Term Stewardship. Office of Environmental Management, Office of Long-Term Stewardship. Draft, Revision 1. July 1. Available at: <http://www.fernaldcab.org/FRReport/keydocuments/DOE2.pdf>.

DOE. 2002c. Long-Term Stewardship Plan for the Weldon Spring, Missouri, Site. Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Program. GJO-2002-342-TAC, GJO-LWEL 1.1-1. August 9. Available at: <http://www.doegjpo.com/programs/ltsm/othersites/weldon/ltsp/ltsp_draft.pdf>.

DOE. 2002d. Performance Management Plan for the Accelerated Cleanup of the Hanford Site. Working Draft. August. Available at: <http://www.hanford.gov/docs/rl-2002-47/rl-2002-47.pdf >.

DOE. 2002e. Miamisburg Environmental Management Project Performance Management Plan for Accelerating Cleanup. Predecisional Draft. July 31. Available at: <http://www.ohio.doe.gov/docs/memp_pmp.pdf>.

DOE. 2002f. Mound Site Assessment of Post-Closure Data Needs. April. Available at: <http://www.fernaldcab.org/FRReport/keydocuments/OtherDOE3a.pdf>.

DOE. 2002g. Hanford Long-Term Stewardship Program: Integrating Accelerated Site Cleanup Completion with Long-range Post-Cleanup Planning. Revision A, Working Draft. HNF-12254. September. Available at: <http://www.hanford.gov/docs/hnf-12254/HNF-12254.pdf>.

ECA (Energy Communities Alliance). 2003. Letter from Seth Kirshenberg, Executive Director, ECA, to Mr. David Geiser, Director, Office of Long-Term Stewardship. February 3.

ECOS (Environmental Council of the States). 2001. ECOS Resolution on Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) at Federal Facilities . Resolution Number 01-9. August 28. Available at: <http://www.sso.org/ecos/policy/resolutions/Resolution%20019.pdf>.

ELI (Environmental Law Institute). 1995. Institutional Controls in Use. September. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Law Institute. Available at: <http://www.eli.org/pdf/rrinstcontrol95.pdf>.

ELI. 1998. Institutional Controls Case Study: Mound Plant. Research Report. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Law Institute. Available at: <http://www.elistore.org/reports_detail.asp?ID=483>.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×

EMAB (Environmental Management Advisory Board). 1999. Long-Term Stewardship Committee Resolution on the Environmental Management Long-Term Stewardship Program. September 23. Available at: <http://www.em.doe.gov/emab/ltsres99923.html>.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1983. Final Environmental Impact Statement for Standards for the Control of Byproduct Materials from Uranium Ore Processing, 40 CFR 192. Volume I. EPA 520/1-83-008-1. September. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation Programs.

EPA. 2000. Use of Institutional Controls in the RCRA Corrective Action Program. Region 5, Waste, Pesticides, and Toxics Division.

EUWG (End Use Working Group). 1998a. Stakeholder Report on Stewardship. July. Available at: <http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/euwg_stwd/stwd_rep_cover.htm>.

EUWG. 1998b. Final Report of the Oak Ridge Reservation End Use Working Group. Available at: <http://www.oro.doe.gov/em/euwg/Cover.htm>.

Epstein, S.S., L.O. Brown, and C. Pope. 1982. Hazardous Waste in America. San Francisco, Calif.: Sierra Club Books.

Fluor Fernald, Inc. 2001. 2000 Integrated Site Environmental Report. 51350-RP-0015. June. Harrison, Ohio: The Fernald Environmental Management Project Public Environmental Information Center. Available at: <http://www.fernald.gov/Cleanup/Environmental_Monitoring/2000%20ISER%20PDF/2000ISER.htm>.


Geiser, D. 2002. DOE LTS Strategic Plan, Questions and Answers. Presentation at the Committee on Long-Term Institutional Management of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: Phase 2 Meeting, Washington, D.C., October 14.

Gerber, M.S. 1992. Legend and Legacy: Fifty Years of Defense Production at the Hanford Site. Revision 2. WHC-MR-0293. Richland, Wash.: Westinghouse Hanford Company.


Holling, C.S. 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. London, England: John Wiley and Sons.


INEEL (Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory). 2002. Long-Term Stewardship Science and Technology Roadmap. Office of Long-Term Stewardship. Draft for review. DOE/ID-10926. Available at: <http://lts.inel.gov/stroadmap/>.

ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council). 2002. Determining Cleanup Goals at Radioactively Contaminated Sites: Case Studies. April. Available at: <http://www.itrcweb.org/user/RAD-2.pdf>.


La Porte, T.R. 2000. Institutional Elements for Long-Term Stewardship in a Nuclear Age (Views from a "stewardee"). Final Report: UCB—LANL Institutional Stewardship

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×

Studies—1998-2000. September. University of California, Berkeley. Available at: <http://socks.berkeley.edu:4050/regexp/part2.pdf>.

La Porte, T.R. 2001. Fiabilite et legitimaite soutenable, [Reliability and Sustainable Legitimacy]. Pp. 71-106 in Mathilde Bourrier, ed, Organiser la fiabilite. Paris, France: L'Harmattan. Translation of, Highly Reliable Operations and the Rigors of Sustained Legitimacy: Matters of Public Trust and Institutional Constancy. Paper presented to Workshop on Organization Approaches to Organizational Reliability, Department Technologies et Sciences de l'Homme, Universite de Technologies de Compiegne, Compiegne, France, Oct. 7-8, 1999.

La Porte, T.R. and A. Keller. 1996. Assuring institutional constancy: Requisite for managing long-lived hazard. Public Administration Review 56(6): 535-544.

La Porte, T.R. and D. Metlay. 1996. Facing a deficit of trust: Hazards and institutional trustworthiness. Public Administration Review 56(4): 341-346.

Landy, M.K., M.J. Roberts, and S.R. Thomas. 1994. The Environmental Protection Agency: Asking the Wrong Questions From Nixon to Clinton. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

Lee, K.N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope. Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

Lee, K.N. 1999. Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology 3(2):3. Available at: <http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art3>.

Mahfood, S. 2002. Letter to Senator Jean Carnahan of Missouri from Stephen Mahfood, Director, Department of Natural Resources, State of Missouri. July 19.

MEMP (Miamisburg Environmental Management Project). 2001. Miamisburg Environmental Management Project Annual Site Environmental Report 2000. Available at: <http://www.ohio.doe.gov/oh_seb/docs/aser2000.pdf>.


NAPA (National Academy of Public Administration). 1997. Deciding for the Future: Balancing Risks, Costs, and Benefits Fairly Across Generations. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Public Administration.

NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Alternatives for Groundwater Cleanup. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 1996a. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 1996b. Improving the Environment: An Evaluation of the DOE's Environmental Management Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 1997. Innovations in Ground Water and Soil Cleanup: From Concept to Commercialization. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×

NRC. 2000a. Long-Term Institutional Management of U.S. Department of Energy Legacy Waste Sites. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2000b. Natural Attenuation for Groundwater Remediation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2002a. Remediation at the Moab Site—Now and for the Long Term. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2002b. Principles and Operational Strategies for Staged Repository Systems, Progress Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2003a. One Step at a Time: The Staged Development of Geologic Repositories for High-Level Waste. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

NRC. 2003b. Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities: Adaptive Site Management. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

Pendergrass, J. 1996. Use of institutional controls as part of a Superfund remedy: lessons from other programs. Environmental Law Reporter 26(March):10109-10123.

Pendergrass, J.A. 1999. Institutional Controls: Grand Junction. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Law Institute.

Pendergrass, J.A. 2000. Protecting Public Health at Superfund Sites: Can Institutional Controls Meet the Challenge. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Law Institute. Available at: <http://www.fernaldcab.org/FRReport/keydocuments/OtherLTS4.pdf>.

Pendergrass, J.A. and S. Kirshenberg. 2001. The Role of Local Government in Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Facilities. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Law Institute and the Energy Communities Alliance. Available at: <http://www.energyca.org/LTS.html>.

Perrow, C. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.

Portney, P.R. and J.P. Weyant, eds. 1999. Discounting and Intergenerational Equity. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

Probst, K.N. and M.H. McGovern. 1998. Long-Term Stewardship and the Nuclear Weapons Complex: The Challenge Ahead. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future. Available at: <http://www.rff.org/reports/PDF_files/stewardship.pdf>.

Probst, K.N. and A.I. Lowe. 2000. Cleaning up the Nuclear Weapons Complex: Does Anybody Care? Center for Risk Management. January. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future. Available at: <http://www.rff.org/reports/PDF_files/probst_cleaningnuclear.pdf>.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×

Reed, L. 2001. Superfund Post Construction Completion: Ensuring Protective Remedies for Future Generations. Presentation at the Board on Radioactive Waste Management Meeting, Washington, D.C., April 3.

RFSWG (Rocky Flats Stewardship Working Group). 2001. Hand-in-Hand: Stewardship and Cleanup. Report from Rocky Flats Stewardship Working Group to the Rocky Flats Coalition of Local Governments and the Rocky Flats Citizens Advisory Board. March. Available at: <http://www.rfcab.org/SWGReport.pdf>.

Rodgers, W.H. 1994. Environmental Law. 2nd Edition. Eagan, Minn.: West Wadsworth.

Russell, M. 1995. Testimony before a subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. 104th Congress, 1st Session.

Russell, M. 1998. Towards a productive divorce: Separating DOE cleanups from transition assistance. Annual Review of Energy and Environment 23:439-63.

Russell, M. 2000. Reducing the Nuclear Legacy Burden: DOE Environmental Management Strategy and Implementation. JIEE Report No. 00-01. Knoxville, Tenn.: Joint Institute for Energy and Environment.

Russell, M. 2002. DOE Legacy Waste Cleanup and Stewardship: Beyond the Top-To-Bottom Review. JIEE Report No. 2002-06. August. Knoxville, Tenn.: Joint Institute for Energy and Environment.


Sandman, P.M. 1994. Risk Communication. Pp. 620-623 in Encyclopedia of the Environment, R.A. Eblen and W.R. Eblen, eds. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.

Sandman, P.M., P.M. Miller, B.B. Johnson, and N.D. Weinstein. 1993. Agency Communication, Community Outrage, and Perception of Risk: Three Simulation Experiments. Risk Analysis 13(6):585-598.

SEAB (Secretary of Energy Advisory Board). 1993. Earning Public Trust and Confidence Requisite for Managing Radioactive Wastes. Final Report. Task Force on Radioactive Waste Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.

Slovic, P. 1993. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis 13(6):675-682.

Stewardship Working Group. 1999. Stakeholder Report on Stewardship. Volume 2. December

. 174 pp. Available at: <http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab/pubs.htm>.

STGWG (State and Tribal Working Group Stewardship Committee). 1999. Closure for the Seventh Generation. February. Washington, D.C.: National Council of State Legislatures.

Susskind, L. and P. Field. 1996. Dealing With an Angry Public: The Mutual Gains Approach to Resolving Disputes. New York, N.Y.: Free Press.


Walters, C.l. 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. New York, N.Y.: Macmillan Publishing.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×

Walters, C.J. and C.S. Holling. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060-2068.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×
Page 39
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×
Page 40
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2003. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10703.
×
Page 42
Next: Appendix A: Statement of Task »
Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report Get This Book
×
 Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Waste Sites: A Status Report
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Department of Energy (DOE) has over 100 sites at which human access will be restricted even after scheduled cleanups because of the radioactive and chemical contamination and waste that will remain. This report reviews long-term plans for protecting human health and the environment at these sites--a mission DOE calls "long-term stewardship." The committee finds that there is a compartmentalization of cleanup planning and planning for long-term stewardship at the sites. The committee recommends that DOE explicitly plan for long-term stewardship responsibilities as part of its cleanup decisions, and that it taking into account capabilities and limitations of long-term stewardship when making cleanup decisions.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!