. "References." Improving Undergraduate Instruction in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
White, B.Y., and Fredericksen, J.R. (2000). Metacognitive facilitation: An approach to making scientific inquiry accessible to all. In J. Minstrell and E.H. Van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 331–370). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice-Hall.
Wilkerson, L., and Lewis, K.G. (2002). Classroom observation: The observer as collaborator. In E.C. Wadsworth, L.R. Hilsen, and K.H. Gillespie (Eds.), A guide to faculty development: Practical advice, examples, and resources (pp. 74–81). Bolton, MA: Anker.
Wright, D.L. (2002). Program types and prototypes. In E.C. Wadsworth, L.R. Hilsen, and K.H. Gillespie (Eds.), A guide to faculty development: Practical advice, examples, and resources (pp. 24–34). Bolton, MA: Anker.
Wright, J.C., Millar, S.B., Kosciuk, S.A., Penberthy, D.L., Williams, P.H., and Wampold, B.E. (1998). A novel strategy for assessing the effects of curriculum reform on student competence. Journal of Chemical Education,75(8), 986–992.
Zumeta, W., and Raveling, J.S. (2003). Attracting the best and the brightest.Issues in Science and Technology, 19(2), 36–40.