National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$58.25
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Pan-Organizational Summit on the U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: Meeting Summary (2003)
Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable (GUIRR)

Citation Manager

Fox, Marye Anne, Ph.D.. "Foreign Scientists Seen Essential to U.S. Biotechnology." Pan-Organizational Summit on the U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: Meeting Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
35
bottomleft bottomright
Page
35
Front Matter (R1-R12)
The U.S. Science & Engineering Workforce: An Unconventional Portrait (1-7)
Position Paper on the U.S. Science & Engineering Workforce (8-17)
Position Paper on the U.S. Science & Engineering Workforce (18-22)
Statement on Workforce Issues (23-28)
The Physics Educated Workforce (29-34)
Foreign Scientists Seen Essential to U.S. Biotechnology (35-36)
Academic Prerequisites for Licensure and Professional Practice (37-39)
Engineering Education and the Science & Engineering Workforce (40-46)
Strengthening Pre-College Science, Math, Engineering and Technology Education: The Technological Literacy and Workforce Imperative (47-51)
A National Strategy to Face Vulnerability in Science Engineering and Technology (52-57)
Position Paper on the U.S. Science & Engineering Workforce (58-67)
Position Statement (68-70)
Building a Pipeline for American Scientists and Engineers (71-78)
Position on the U.S. Science & Engineering Workforce (79-83)
Increasing the Supply of Underrepresented Persons of Color in Science and Engineering Occupations (84-90)
Position Paper on the U.S. Science & Engineering Workforce (91-96)
Inititative on Precollege Science, Math and Technology, Education In Support of the U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce (97-104)
Effects of the Current Economic Downturn on the U.S. Science and Technology Workforce: Long Term Implications (105-108)
Trying Times for U.S. Engineers (109-118)
The Underrepresentation of Women in Engineering and Related Science: Pursuing Two Complementary Paths to Parity (119-126)
NACME, Enginerring, and (127-133)
Skills for a 21st Century Workforce: Can We Meet the Challenge? (134-137)
Transforming the Academic Workplace: Socializing Underrepresented Minorities into Faculty Life (138-144)
Mathematics As a Foundation for a Productive Science and Engineering Workforce (145-148)
Utilization of African American Physicists in the Science & Engineering Workforce (149-155)
Building a Federal Civil Service for the 21st Century: The Challenge of Attracting Great Talent to Government Service (156-160)
Position Statement on the U.S. Science & Engineering Workforce (161-166)
Is There a Shortage of Scientists and Engineers? How Would We Know? (167-179)
Position of the Board of Directors on the U.S. Science & Engineering Workforce (180-187)
U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: Equity and Participation (188-194)
WEPAN Position Statement (195-200)
Concluding Remarks (201-202)
Appendix A: Keynote Speaker Addresses (203-217)
Appendix B: Non-Profit Organizations Participating in the Pan-Organizational Summit on the U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce (218-219)
Appendix C: Summit Agenda (220-223)
Appendix D: National Academies Publications on the Science & Engineering Workforce, Bibliography (224-228)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 35
Stephen Dahms American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB) The scarcity of skilled technicians is seen by the biotechnology indus- try in the U.S. and Canada as one of its most serious challenges. The suc- cess of this industry is dependent on the quality of its workforce, and the skills and talents of highly trained people are recognized as one of the most vital and dynamic sources of competitive advantage. The U.S. biotechnology industry workforce has been growing 14 to 17 percent annually over the last six years and is now over 190,000 and con- servatively estimated to reach 500,000 by 2012. Despite efforts by the in- dustry to encourage U.S. institutions to increase the production of needed specialists, a continual shortfall in the needed expertise requires access to foreign workers. Foreign workers with unique skills that are scarce in the U.S. can get permission to stay in the U.S. for up to six years under the H- 1B classification, after which they can apply for permanent resident sta- tus. There are currently over 600,000 foreign workers in this category across all industries, and they are critical to the success and global com- petitiveness of this nation. Of these H-1B visa horders, 46 percent are from India and 10 percent are from China, followed in descending order by Canada, Philippines, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, U.K., Pakistan, and the Rus- sian Federation. Our annual national surveys have demonstrated that between 6 and 10 percent of the biotechnology workforce have H-1B visas. The constant short- fall in specialized technical workers that has been experienced by the bio- technology industry over the past six years has been partially alleviated by access to talented individuals from other nations. However, the industry's need is sufficient to justify a 25 percent increase in H-lBs in 2004. Ire REP

OCR for page 36
PAN-~CANIZAHONAL SUMMIT Biotechnology industry H-1B visa holders are mainly in highly sought after areas such as analytical chemistry, instrumentation specialization, organic synthesis, product safety and surveillance, clinical research/bio- statistics, bio/pharm quality, medicinal chemistry, product scale-up, bioinformatics and applied genomics, computer science, cheminformatics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Forty percent of H-1B foreign workers are at the Ph.D. level, 35 per- cent M.S., 20 percent B.S., and 5 percent M.D. In comparison, the U.S. biotechnology industry technical workforce is estimated to be 19 percent Ph.D., 17 percent M.S., 50 percent B.S., and 14 percent combined voc-ed/ community college trained. These and other survey data by industry hu- man resource groups clearly show that the H-1B worker skills match the most pressing employment needs of the biotechnology industry. The data demonstrate that maintaining a reasonably-sized H-1B cap is critical to the industry. Although the national annual H-1B visa cap was raised from 115,000 to 195,000 in the 106th Congress via S. 2045, the cap has already been exceeded. The increased cap remains in effect until 2003 and efforts are under way to ensure that it remains high. The Third Annual National Survey of H-lBs in the biotechnology in- dustry found that 80 percent are from U.S. universities, and 85 percent of those eventually get green cards. Companies now spend, on average, $10,200 in processing fees and legal expenses to obtain each green card, an estimated cost to the industry of more than $150 million over the past 5 years. In the wake of the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks, debate has been focused on more restrictions on foreign students, a development that would have a severe impact upon the competitiveness of the U.S. biotech- nology industry. Clearly, the H-1B route provides a temporary solution to shortages in the national and domestic biotechnology labor pools, short- ages mirroring the inadequate production of appropriately trained U.S. nationals by U.S. institutions of higher learning. The reality is that univer- sities have inadequate resources for expanding the training pipeline, par- ticularly in the specialized areas of the research phase of company prod- uct development. Efforts should be directed toward influencing greater congressional and federal agency attention to these important topics. The author of this article, A. Stephen Dahms, is executive director of the Califor- nia State University System Biotechnology Program (CSUPERB); chair of the Workforce Committee, Biotechnology Industry Organization; and a member of the ASBMB Education and Professional Development Committee. Statistical data are from surveys conducted by CSUPERB, as an activity of the Biotechnology Industry Organization's Workforce Committee; and for Canada, from Statistics Canada.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

stephen dahms