Cover Image


View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 41

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 40
David Wormley, Dean of Engineering Pennsylvania State University Chair, Engineering Deans Council American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND THE NATIONAL INTEREST A vibrant engineering education enterprise benefits civic, economic, and intellectual activity in this country. Engineering graduates learn to integrate scientific and engineering principles to develop products and processes that contribute to economic growth, advances in medical care, enhanced national security systems, ecologically sound resource manage- ment, and many other beneficial areas. As a result, students who graduate with engineering degrees bring highly prized skills into a wide spectrum of sectors in the American workforce. Some conduct research that results in socially or economically valuable technological applications. Others produce and manage the technological innovations said to account for one third to one half of growth in the American economy. Still more bring advanced analytical abilities and knowledge of high technology to fields as diverse as health care, financial services, law, and government. Within all of these groups, the diversity of engineering graduates' backgrounds and viewpoints contributes to their ability to achieve the advances in in- novation, productivity, and effectiveness that make them valuable con- tributors to the American workplace. THE IMPORTANCE OF TECHNICAL COMPETENCIES At a time when technological innovations are intrinsically coupled with virtually every aspect of society, it is imperative to develop a scien- tific and technically literate society. However, broad indicators of short- comings in developing technical competencies within the U.S. population ~8

OCR for page 40
N SOCILTY EOR FNGINEERING FDUCAHON at large indicate the scale of the challenge at hand. In 2001, companies spent over $57 billion on training, much of which paid for workers' train- ing in basic skills that should have been learned in school. Meanwhile, the United States' poor performance in teaching math and science shown in results from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study and the National Assessment of Educational Progress eliminates many of the best and brightest schoolchildren from the ranks of future scientists and engineers. With little chance to learn in school how science and math skills might translate into professionally useful knowledge, students are unable to make informed choices about further education and work op- tions. As a result, some unprepared students undertake science and engi- neering studies in college, only to drop out; other, potentially capable, students never consider these subjects in the first place. In both cases, precious human and institutional resources are squandered. An increasingly large share of the workforce consists of women and minorities. The 2000 report of the Commission on the Advancement of Women & Minorities in Science, Engineering, and Technology notes that, although African-Americans and Hispanics represent 3 percent each of the technical workforce, they are each 15 percent of the school-age popu- lation. Demographic projections only reinforce this point: by 2035, these students will rise from about 30 percent to nearly 50 percent of the nation's schoolchildren.2 Twenty years of improvements in math and science achievement have brought girls near parity with boys on National As- sessment of Educational Progress tests. However, as they move through middle and high school, girls' interest in math and science wanes, as teacher, parent, peer, and media influences work in complex, often un- conscious, ways to discourage their pursuit of these subjects. As a result, women represent only 19 percent of the technical workforce, although they represent 46 percent of all American workers. Success in encourag- ing and retaining women and underrepresented minorities throughout their pre-college, college, and postgraduate years must be a core compo- nent of enhancing the U.S. science and engineering workforce. A curriculum framework based on connecting science and mathemat- ics to the world around them can also impart habits of mind to students that yield benefits beyond workplace productivity and career advance- ment. At the simplest level, the imperatives of good citizenship increas- ingly require acquaintance with fundamental principles of scientific knowledge. Taking a problem-based approach to learning, engineering iTraining Magazine, "Industry Report 2001," Minneapolis: Bit Communications. 2Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering and Technology Development (2000~. Land of Plenty: Diversity as America's Competitive Edge in Science and Technology.

OCR for page 40
PAN-~CANIZAHONAL SUMMIT education asks students to integrate knowledge and practices from the sciences, economics, language, and creative arts. Thus, elements of sci- ence and engineering education are important contributors to developing fully literate citizens. ENGINEERING EDUCATION DEMOGRAPHICS3 In 2001, just over 65,000 students earned engineering bachelor's de- grees. While this is almost 3,000 more than in 1999, the total represents a decrease from the mid-1980s, when about 85,000 students a year gradu- ated with engineering degrees. Nearly 386,000 students were enrolled in undergraduate engineering programs last year; however, the national at- trition rate is high, and at least 40 percent of students who start engineer- ing programs do not finish them. Graduate enrollments increased approximately 5 percent in 2001, with approximately 79,000 master's degree students and 41,500 doctoral stu- dents. Within these groups, 43 percent of master's degrees and 54 percent of doctorates were awarded to foreign-born students, and these trends have been increasing. Meanwhile, U.S. engineering graduates incur near-term financial penalties for choosing grad school with its modest stipends and delayed rewards over immediate employment at some of the highest sal- ary levels among college graduates. Foreign-born students bring a wealth of diversity and energy to U.S. campuses, but they also have an increasing inclination to return to their home countries after graduating, taking with them expertise and potential achievement that would otherwise enhance the strength of the U. S. science and engineering workforce. In 2001, 19.9 percent of bachelor's degrees in engineering were awarded to women, 5.3 percent to African-Americans and 6.4 percent to Hispanics. For women and African-Americans, these percentages repre- sent slight but perceptible decreases from recent years. And indeed, when understood in the context of recent increases in overall under- graduate enrollments, these dwindling percentages indicate even more clearly that engineering is failing to attract the diversity of students needed to draw on the full extent of abilities available in an increasingly diverse American society. Engineering programs' faculties have comparably low representations of women and underserved minorities. Women make up about 9 percent of tenured and tenure-track faculty members, although they account for 17.5 percent of assistant professors. African-Americans and Hispanics make up less than 3 percent of tenured and tenure-track faculties, although they also 3American Society for Engineering Education (2001~. Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Colleges. Washington, DC.

OCR for page 40
~MERICAN SOCILTY FOR FNGINEERING FDUCAHON represent a higher percentage of the entry faculty levels. If women and mi- nority faculty continue to increase at the entry levels, their presence could increase in the future. In light of the trends in undergraduate enrollments, however, such increases might not be sustainable because the pool of fu- ture women and minority faculty members is currently decreasing. These statistics suggest that efforts to expand the reach of engineering education to the entire spectrum of American society have not succeeded. In spite of the growing importance of technology-related activities to American life in the 21st century, the number of U.S. students pursuing studies and work in technical fields is not increasing proportionally, par- ticularly at the graduate level. For the United States to retain a position of global leadership in these fields, these trends must be reversed. LESSONS LEARNED In formulating responses to the challenges described here, engineering educators have taken as a guiding principle the need to attract better-prepared students into engineering programs and to provide them with an education that increasingly helps them meet their personal and professional goals. The Need to Partner with K-12 The failure to prepare K-12 students with the knowledge they need to make an informed choice about pursuing a career in a scientific or techni- cal area requires significantly increased cooperation between science and engineering professionals and K-12 teachers and students. We need to engage vigorously and collectively to help teachers develop new curricula and to help students understand the ways in which careers in science and engineering help society. The Need to Reform Engineering Education Recent changes in the practice of engineering education span the con- tent of the curriculum, the organizational and operational principles of engineering education programs, and the opportunities for learning avail- able in the field. This reform in engineering education has been dramatic- perhaps matched only by the development of science-based engineering education in the 1950s and continues to occur not only in higher educa- tion but also in the K-12 arena. Codified in the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Criteria 2000, new ap- proaches to engineering accreditation require engineering programs to incorporate critical professional skills and content into their curricula and to strive for adaptability and accountability to their constituencies in their

OCR for page 40
PAN-~CANIZAHONAL SUMMIT operations and principles. In line with this trend, engineering educators have significantly revised the ways in which they assess the effectiveness of their own programs. Previously, engineering education assessment con- sisted largely in monitoring schools' adherence to a fairly uniform cur- riculum. Reform in engineering education assessment now holds schools to a standard of continuous self-improvement, encouraging schools to develop rigorous practices for defining educational missions and demon- strating results that show fulfillment of these missions. In addition to the fundamental science and engineering content, in- creasingly important elements in the engineering curriculum are effective communications, working in teams, and organizational management. Rec- ognizing that new technologies drive so much economic growth, more and more engineering educators are teaching entrepreneurship to stu- dents, many of whom will provide the technical know-how for new com- panies and innovative products to come. And in an effort to stem the tide of attrition among engineering students, colleges increasin~lv Provide 1 ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 - ~J J 1 ~ 1 substantive, hands-on design and engineering content In freshman courses emphasizing the creative aspects of engineering. This marks a change from the traditional engineering curriculum that puts students through rigorous training in mathematics and science before providing a context for the engineering process. Engineering programs are evolving to make available opportunities to pursue diverse areas of study that match the rapid pace of discovery and innovation in science and engineering, many of which are interdisci- plinary. Advances in understanding and manipulating the mechanics of molecular and atomic activity have created new realms for engineering education and research. Significant new programs in bioengineering and nanotechnology have been initiated at many schools, drawing rapidly growing numbers of students. RECOMMENDATIONS Many engineering educators have devoted significant effort to chang- ing the way we recruit and support our students so that as many students as possible from as many different American neighborhoods as possible have a chance to pursue a scientific or engineering career. Some general recommendations, based on this experience, follow. K-12 Engineering Education Starting at least in middle school, and preferably earlier, schoolchil- dren need exposure to engineering concepts and applications. Existing

OCR for page 40
MERICAN SOCILTY FOR FNGINEERING FDUCAHON pre-college mathematics and science curricula can, in most cases, accom- modate content related to engineering without departing from standards- driven educational imperatives. The significant number of highly success- ful engineering education outreach programs to K-12 classrooms across the country show that this is possible. Pre-college engineering education offers a vehicle for applying mathematics and science to students' real- world experiences, for developing a sense of the creative aspects of engi- neering, and for showing how working in teams contributes to achieving goals. Equipped with both a sense of how mathematics and science re- lates to their lives and an understanding of the creative aspects of engi- neering, high school graduates will be better able to make informed choices about studying engineering and other technical fields. Reducing Attrition in Higher Education Attrition among students who start out in engineering education pro- grams results from various factors. One force behind the high attrition rates in the study of engineering is the lack of preparation in technical fields that high school graduates have when entering college. Students enter engineering programs without either sufficient preparation in math and science or a comprehensive grasp of what a career in engineering entails. As a result, they face stark academic challenges in their first year of college, which they must bear without a clear sense of how their stud- ies relate to their future profession. The task of attracting and retaining a diverse student body is influ- enced by the climate that students encounter in engineering programs. For women and minorities, the presence of role models and mentors on the faculty often increases these students' abilities to imagine themselves continuing and succeeding in the field. In addition, active peer support networks provide a community of fellow students with whom they can share their trials and successes. Increased effort is needed to create envi- ronments that combine intellectual stimulation with opportunities for so- cial and personal growth to help the broadest range of students become successful in and committed to engineering. Engineering education needs to accelerate the pace of reform and re- newal and to consider both undergraduate and graduate programs from a holistic view. Further efforts are needed to integrate the important inter- disciplinary elements of science and engineering and, equally important, the context of the practice and role of engineering in a technology-driven society in the curriculum. These measures will help reduce currently high attrition rates and make the educational experience more rewarding and efficient for students and professors alike.

OCR for page 40
PAN-~CANIZAHONAL SUMMIT Government's Role Government at the local, state, and federal levels can help in develop- ing the science and engineering workforce needed for the future. Govern- ment support is vital to encourage all high school graduates to take four years of math- ematics and science; provide opportunities and support for in-service teacher profes- sional development in K-12 science, technology, engineering, and math- ematics and for enhancements to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics content in teacher-training programs; support partnerships between K-12 and higher education; provide graduate student support in science and engineering; and provide support for faculty starting their careers in science and en- . . gmeermg. CONCLUSION A final suggestion pertains more generally to how we frame studying and working in engineering, science, and technology fields within a broader social context. Aligning these fields with the services they render to society as a whole will do much to attract the best students for the best reasons the chance to engineer, if you will, a world free from pain through bioengineering, a world free from fear through technology-sup- ported counter-terrorism measures, and a world free from environmental degradation through appropriate uses of our natural resources and the development of renewable energy supplies. Such a message that com- bines the promise of personal rewards with the opportunity to make meaningful contributions to the world we all share would provide a pow- erful foundation for the work we are contemplating here today.