Click for next page (


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 11
-1 HI - Attach~nent C List of RCYIOWeFS This interim letter report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise' if accordance with procedures approved by the RC's Repoh Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical continents that wit! assist the institution in :making the published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the -following individuals for their participation in the review of this report. Adi} 13ushnak7 Bushman Group, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Robed Carnahan, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL Menachetn Eli~nelech3 Yale University, New Haven, CT Virginia Grebbien, Orange County Water District, Fountain Valley, CA Thomas Seacord' Carollo Engineers' Boise7 ID R. Rhodes Trussed, Tmssell Technologies, Inc., Pasadena, CA Ian Watson, RosTek Associates, Inc.7 Tampa, :FL Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were nof asked to endorse the concIusions or reco~n~nendations' nor did they see the final draft of the accost before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Philip Singer' University of Noah Carolina' Chapel Hill, NTC. Appointed by the ARC, he was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with NRC procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this repot rests entirely with the authoring committee and the NRC.