References

Barab, S.A., and Duffy, T.M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen and S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Barabasi, A. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.

Black, P., and Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-73.

Blanton, W.E., Mooreman, G., and Trathen, W. (1998). Telecommunications and teacher education: A social constructivist review. In P.D. Pearson and A. Iran-Nejad (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 23, 235-275.

Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B.J., Krajcik, J., and Marx, R. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3).

Boesel, D. (2001). (Ed.). Continuing professional development. Washington, DC: National Library of Education. Available: (www.ericsp.org/pages/digests/ConProfDev.pdf).

Burstein, J. (2001). Automated essay evaluation with natural language processing. Presented at the conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education, April 12, Seattle, WA.


Cattagni, A., and Farris, E. (2001, May). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2000. (Publication #NCES 2001071.) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Available: (http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2001071).

Cochran-Smith, M., and Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities . In A. Iran-Nejad and P. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 24, 251-307.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 72
References Barab, S.A., and Duffy, T.M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen and S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Barabasi, A. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus. Black, P., and Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-73. Blanton, W.E., Mooreman, G., and Trathen, W. (1998). Telecommunications and teacher education: A social constructivist review. In P.D. Pearson and A. Iran-Nejad (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 23, 235-275. Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B.J., Krajcik, J., and Marx, R. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3). Boesel, D. (2001). (Ed.). Continuing professional development. Washington, DC: National Library of Education. Available: (www.ericsp.org/pages/digests/ConProfDev.pdf). Burstein, J. (2001). Automated essay evaluation with natural language processing. Presented at the conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education, April 12, Seattle, WA. Cattagni, A., and Farris, E. (2001, May). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2000. (Publication #NCES 2001071.) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Available: (http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2001071). Cochran-Smith, M., and Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities . In A. Iran-Nejad and P. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 24, 251-307.

OCR for page 72
Confrey, J., Castro-Filho, J., and Wilhelm, J. (2000). Implementation research as a means to link systemic reform and applied psychology in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 35(3). Darling-Hammond, L., and Sykes, G. (1999). (Eds.). Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. De Ruyter, B. (2002). Challenges for end-user development in CE devices. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Philips NV Research Labs. Education Week. (2000). Quality counts 2000: Who should teach? Available: (http://www.edweek.org/sreports/qc00/). Foshay, R. (2000). Instructional models: Four ways to integrate PLATO into the classroom. (Technical Paper No. 6). Edina, MN: TRO Learning. Fuhrman, S.H. (1994). Challenges in systemic education reform. (CPRE Policy Brief.) Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Goetz, M.E., Floden, R.E., and O’Day, J. (1996, October). Systemic reform. In Studies of education reform (3 vols.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Available: (http://www.ed.gov/pubs/SER/SysReform/). Goldman, S.R. (2001). Professional development in a digital age. In D. Boesel (Ed.), Continuing professional development (pp. 117-136). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Library of Education. Haertel, G., and Means, B. (2000). Building a foundation for a decade of rigorous, systematic educational technology research. Available: (http://www.sri.com/policy/designkt/found.html). [To appear as two volumes with Teachers College Press in 2003.] Hagel, J., and Armstrong, A.G. (1997). Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Harvard Graduate School of Education. (in press). Scaling Up Success: Lessons Learned from Technology-based Educational Innovation. Proceedings from a conference, March 20-21, 2003. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass. Paper abstracts available at http://www.gse.harvard.edu/scalingup/. Hattie, J.A., Biggs, J., and Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Research in Education, 66, 99-136. Haycock, K. (1998). Good teaching matters: How well-qualified teachers can close the gap. Thinking K-16, 3(2), 1-16. Available: (http://www.edtrust.org/main/main/reports.asp). Honey, M., Culp, K.M., and Carrigg, R. (1999). Perspectives on technology and education research: Lessons from the past and present. New York: Center for Children and Technology. Hoppe, U., Minrad, M., and Kinshuk, H. (2002). (Eds.). Proceedings of the first IEEE international workshop on wireless and mobile technologies in education (WMTE’02), August 29-30. Växjö, Sweden. New York: IEEE Press. International Society for Teachers in Education. (1999). National educational technology standards for students—Connecting curriculum and technology. Eugene, OR: Author. Kaput, J., and Hegedus, S. (2002). Exploiting classroom connectivity by aggregating student constructions to create new learning opportunities. Paper presented at the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, July 21-26, Norwich, UK.

OCR for page 72
Kaput, J., Noss, R., and Hoyles, C. (2001). Developing new notations for a learnable mathematics in the computational era. In L.D. English (Ed.), The handbook of international research in mathematics (pp. 51-73). London: Kluwer. Kim, A. J. (2000). Community building on the Web: Secret strategies for successful online communities. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press. Kintsch, E., Steinhart, D., Stahl, G., LSA Research Group, Matthews, C., and Lamb, R. (2000). Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-based feedback. Interactive Learning Environments, 8(2), 87-109. Knapp, M.S. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(2). Kostoff, R.N., and Schaller, R.R. (2001). Science and technology roadmaps. IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management, 48(2), 132-143. Linn, M., Davis, E., and Bell, P. (in press). (Eds.). Internet environments for science education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Mann, D., Shakeshaft, C., Becker, J., and Kottkamp, R. (1998). West Virginia story: Achievement gains from a statewide comprehensive instructional technology program. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Educational Technology. Means, B., Blando, J., Olson, K., Middleton, T., Morocco, C., Remz, A., and Zorfass, J. (1993). Using technology to support education reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Available: (http://www.ed.gov/pubs/EdReformStudies/TechReforms/). Means, B., and Penuel, B. (in press). In Harvard Graduate School of Education, scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational innovation. Proceedings from a conference, March 20-21, 2003. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass. Milken Family Foundation. (1999, September). Survey of technology in the schools; Preliminary tables. Santa Monica, CA. Available: (http://www.mff.org/edtech/). Minstrell, J. (2000). Student thinking and related assessment: Creating a fact-based learning environment. In National Research Council, Grading the nation’s report card: Research from the evaluation of NAEP (pp. 44-73). Committee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress. N.S. Raju, J.W. Pellegrino, M.W. Bertenthal, K.J. Mitchell, and L.R. Jones (Eds.). Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L.S., and Almond, R.G. (2003). Integrating substantive and statistical arguments in educational assessment. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1(1). Murphy, R.F., Penuel, W.R., Means, B., Korbak, C., Whaley, A., and Allen, J.E. (2002, February). E-DESK: A review of recent evidence on the effectiveness of discrete educational software. (SRI Project 11063). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. National Association of State Boards of Education. (2001). Any time, any place, any path, any pace: Taking the lead on e-learning policy. Available: (http://www.nasbe.org/e_learning.html). National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. (2000). Before it’s too late: A report to the nation from the National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: U.S.

OCR for page 72
Department of Education. Available: (http://www.ed.gov/americacounts/glenn/toc.html). National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York: Author. Available: (http://www.nctaf.org/publications/index.html). National Research Council. (1997). Developing a digital national library for undergraduate science, mathematics, engineering and technology education: Report of a workshop. Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: (http://books.nap.edu/books/0309059771/html/index.html). National Research Council. (1998). Fostering research on the economic and social impacts of information technology: Report of a workshop. Steering Committee on Research Opportunities Relating to Economic and Social Impacts of Computing and Communications, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: (http://books.nap.edu/books/030906032X/html/index.html). National Research Council. (1999a). Being fluent with information technology. Committee on Information Technology Literacy, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: (http://books.nap.edu/books/030906399X/html/index.html). National Research Council. (1999b). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. M.S. Donovan, J.D. Bransford, and J.W. Pellegrino (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: (http://books.nap.edu/books/0309065364/html/index.html). National Research Council. (1999c). Improving student learning: A strategic plan for education research and its utilization. Committee on a Feasibility Study for a Strategic Research Program, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: (http://books.nap.edu/books/0309064899/html/index.html). National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school, Expanded edition. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning and Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. J.D. Bransford, A. Brown, and R. Cocking, (Eds.). Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: (http://books.nap.edu/books/0309070368/html/index.html). National Research Council. (2001a). Building a workforce for the information economy. Committee on Workforce Needs in Information Technology. Board on Testing and Assessment; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy; Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel. Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: (http://books.nap.edu/books/0309069939/html/index.html). National Research Council. (2001b). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment. J. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, and R. Glaser (Eds). Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences

OCR for page 72
and Education. Washington , DC: National Academy Press. Available: (http://books.nap.edu/books/0309072727/html/index.html). National Research Council. (2002a). Enhancing undergraduate learning with information technology: A workshop summary. M. Hilton (Ed.), Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: (http://books.nap.edu/books/0309082781/html/index.html). National Research Council. (2002b). Improving learning with information technology: Report of a workshop. Steering Committee on Improving Learning with Information Technology. G.E. Pritchard (Ed.). Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: (http://books.nap.edu/books/030908413X/html/index.html). National Research Council. (2002c). Preparing for the revolution: Information technology and the future of the research university. Panel on the Impact of Information Technology on the Future of the Research University, Policy and Global Affairs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: (http://books.nap.edu/books/030908640X/html/index.html). National Research Council. (2003). Strategic education research partnership. Committee on a Strategic Education Research Partnership. M.S. Donovan, A.K. Wigdor, and C.E. Snow (Eds.). Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: (http://www.nap.edu/books/0309088798/html/). National Science Foundation. (2002). Research and development in industry: 1999. (NSF 02-312, Project Officer and Principal Author, R.M. Wolfe). Arlington, VA: Division of Science Resources Statistics. Available: (http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf02312/pdfstart.htm). National Science Foundation. (2003). Revolutionary science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Arlington, VA: Author. O’Neil, H.R. Jr. (2003). Technology applications in education: A learning view. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pea, R.D. (2002). Learning science through collaborative visualization over the Internet. In N. Ringertz (Ed.), Nobel Symposium: Virtual museums and public understanding of science and culture. Stockholm, Sweden: Nobel Academy Press. Pea, R.D., Tinker, R., Linn, M., Means, B., Bransford, J., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Brophy, S., and Songer, N. (1999). Toward a learning technologies knowledge network. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 19-38. Perry, G., and Talley, S. (2001). Online video case studies and teacher education: A new tool for pre-service teacher education. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(4), 6-31. Phaal, R., Farrukh, C., and Probert, D. (2001, November 14). Technology roadmapping: Linking technology resources to business objectives. Cambridge, UK: Center for Technology Management, University of Cambridge.

OCR for page 72
President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), Panel on Educational Technology. (1997, March). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Available: (http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/NSTC/PCAST/k-12ed.html). President’s Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC). (1999, February). Information technology research: Investing in our future. Available: (http://www.hpcc.gov/ac/report/). President’s Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC). (2001, February). Using information technology to change the way we learn. S.L. Graham and A.J. Viterbi (Chairs). Panel on Transforming the Way We Learn. Available: (http://www.hpcc.gov/pubs/pitac/index.html). Reeves, B., and Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press. Roschelle, J., and Pea, R.D. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning. The International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1(1), 145-168. Roschelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., and Means, B. (2001). Changing how and what children learn in school with collaborative cognitive technologies. In M. Shields (Ed.), The future of children (Special Issue, Children and Computer Technology, published by the David and Lucille Packard Foundation, Los Altos, CA), 10(2), 76-101. Salvucci, D.D., and Anderson, J.R. (2000, April). Intelligent gaze-added interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, (273-280), The Hague, The Netherlands. Sandholtz, J., Ringstaff, C., and Dwyer, D. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press. Schaller, R. (1999, March). Technology roadmaps: Implications for innovation, strategy, and policy. (Ph.D. dissertation proposal.) Fairfax, VA: George Mason University. Available: (http://mason.gmu.edu/~rschalle/rdmprop.html). Schlager, M.S., Fusco, J., and Schank, P. (2002). Evolution of an on-line education community of practice. In A. Renninger and W. Shumar (Eds.). Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 129-159). New York: Cambridge University Press. Seely Brown, J., and Duguid, P. (2002). The social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Shields, P.M., March, J., and Adelman, N. (1997). Evaluation of the National Science Foundation’s Statewide Systemic Initiatives (SSI) Program: The SSI’s impacts on classroom practice. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Shulman, J.H. (1992). (Ed.). Case methods in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press. Smith, M.S., and O’Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S.H. Fuhrman and B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing: 1990 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 233-267). London and Washington, DC: Falmer Press.

OCR for page 72
Snyder, T. (2000). Outside evaluation of LemonLINK technology innovation challenge grant, evaluation year 2000. U.S. Department of Education Grant R303A97009801A, Edward Snyder and Associates. Stokes, D.E. (1999). Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. U.S. Department of Energy. (2000, July). Applying science and technology roadmapping in environmental management. Washington, DC: Office of Environmental Management. Available: (http://emi-web.inel.gov/roadmap/guide.pdf). Waxman, H.C., Connell, M.L., and Gray, J. (2002). A quantitative synthesis of recent research on the effects of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Web-Based Education Commission. (2000). The power of the Internet for learning: Final report of the Web-Based Education Commission. Available: (http://www.ed.gov/offices/AC/WBEC/FinalReport/).