Click for next page ( 84


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 83
References AGI (American Geological Institute). 2001. Report on the Status of Academic Geoscience Departments. Alexandria, VA: AGI, 9 pp. Ahlbrandt, T.S., R.R. Charpentier, T.R. Klett, J.W. Schmoker, and C.J. Schenk. 2000. Analysis of assessment results. Chapter AR in USGS World Petroleum Assessment 2000: De- scription and Results, DDS-60. Denver, CO: U.S. Geological Society, 323 pp. Ahlbrandt, T.S. 2002. Future petroleum energy resources of the world. International Geol- ogy Review, 44:1092-1104. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. 2003. Gas Market Overview, February. Houston, TX: Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. Ausubel, J. 1996. Can technology save the planet? Scientific American, 84:166-178. Canadian Gas Potential Committee. 1997. Natural Gas Potential in Canada, 1997. Calgary, Alberta: Canadian Gas Potential Committee, 111 pp. + figures. Canadian Gas Potential Committee. 2001. Natural Gas Potential in Canada, 2001. Calgary, Alberta: Canadian Gas Potential Committee, 526 pp. Canadian National Energy Board. 1999. Canadian Energy: Supply and Demand to 2025. Calgary, Alberta: Canadian National Energy Board, 100 pp. Canadian National Energy Board. 2002. Short-Term Natural Gas Deliverability from the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin 2002-2004. Calgary, Alberta: Canadian National Energy Board, 25 pp. Canadian National Energy Board. 2003. Canada's Energy Future: Scenarios for Supply and Demand to 2025. Calgary, Alberta: Canadian National Energy Board, 98 pp. Cedigaz. 2002. Natural Gas Statistics for 2001, Initial Estimates, March 28. Rueil-Malmaison, France: Cedigaz. EIA (Energy Information Administration). 2000a. Annual Energy Outlook with Projections to 2020. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Energy, 262 pp. EIA. 2000b. Annual Energy Review 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 411 PP EIA. 2001a. EIA's Annual Energy Review 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of En- ergy, 430 pp. 83

OCR for page 83
84 U.S. NATURAL GAS DEMAND, SUPPLY, AND TECHNOLOGY EIA. 2001b. International Energy Annual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 251 PP EIA.2002a. Annual Energy Outlook 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 262 PP EIA. 2002b. Oil and Gas Supply Module (OGSM) of the National Energy Modeling System Model Documentation 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 84 pp. EIA.2003a. Annual Energy Outlook with Projections to 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Depart- ment of Energy, 262 pp. EIA. 2003b. Natural Gas Weekly Update, May 22, 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 6 pp. EIA. 2003c. Short Term Energy Outlook, May 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 1 pp. EIA. 2003d. EIA's Monthly Energy Review of June, 2003 as Augmented by EIA's Natural Gas Weekly Update of July 10,2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 206 PP EIA. 2003e. Monthly Energy Review, April 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of En- ergy, 202 pp. EIA. 2003f. International Energy Outlook 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of En- ergy, 272 pp. Fisher, W.2002. Domestic natural gas: The coming methane economy. Geotimes, November: 20-22. Heath and Associates. 2001. The Potential for Coalbed Methane (CBM) Development in Alberta. Prepared for the Alberta Department of Energy by Heath and Associates. Lou- isville, KY: Heath and Associates, 77 pp. Henry, M.E., and R.R. Charpentier.2001. Comparison of recent natural gas estimates for the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (abs). American Association of Petroleum Geolo- gists Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, June 3-6, pp. A85. Hill, S.T. 1997. Science and Engineering Doctorate Awards: 1996. NSF 97-329. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 10 pp. Hill, S.T.2000. Division of Science Resources Studies, Science and Engineering Degrees: 1966- 97. NSF 00-310. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 87 pp. Hill, S.T. 2002a. Science and Engineering Doctorate Awards: 2001. NSF 03-300. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 124 pp. Hill, S.T. 2002b. Science and Engineering Awards: 2000. NSF 02-305. Arlington, VA: Na- tional Science Foundation, 108 pp. IHS Energy. 2002. Energy Data CD (November 2002~. Englewood, CO: IHS Energy. CD- ROM. IHS Energy. 2003. Production Data Base. Englewood, CO: IHS Energy. CD-ROM. Kumar, N. 2001. Reserves and Resources, Supply and Demand: Why We Need Credible Resource Assessments. Testimony Presented to the U.S. House of Representatives, Sub- committee on Energy and Mineral Resources, March 22. Available at www.aupg.org/ divisions/dpa/testimonies/2001/010322_house_nk_emd.html. Kuuskraa, V.A., 2003. Perspectives and Issues in Assessing Unconventional Resources. Soci- ety of Petroleum Engineers Unconventional Resource Assessment Symposium, USGS, Reston, VA, May 20. Lore, G.L., D.A. Marin, E.C. Batchelder, W.C. Courtwright, R.P. Desseles, Jr., and R.J. Klazynski. 2001. 2000 Assessment of Conventionally Recoverable Hydrocarbon Re- sources of the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf as of January 1, 1999. OCS Report MMS 2001-087. New Orleans, LA: Minerals Management Service, 652 pp.

OCR for page 83
REFERENCES 85 Luyties, W. 2003. NaKika: Use of Technology in a Record Water Depth Development. Soci- ety of Petroleum Engineers Gulf Coast Section Luncheon for Facilities and Construc- tion, Houston, TX, March 18. Marchetti, C., and N. Nakicenovic. 1974. The Dynamics of Energy Systems and the Logistic Substitution Model. Research Report-79-013. Laxenburg, Austria: International Insti- tute for Applied Systems Analysis, 73 pp. National Energy Technology Laboratory. 2002. All about hydrates: Natural methane hy- drates. Available at www.netl.doe.gov/scng/hydrate/index.html. National Petroleum Council. 1992. The Potential for Natural Gas in the United States: De- mand and Distribution. Washington, DC: National Petroleum Council, 2012 pp. National Petroleum Council. 1999. Meeting Challenges of the Nation's Growing Natural Gas Demand. Washington, DC: National Petroleum Council, 267 pp. National Petroleum Council. 2001. Securing Oil and Natural Gas Infrastructures in the New Economy. Washington, DC: National Petroleum Council, 100 pp. National Science Board. 2002. Science and Engineering Indicators 2002. Arlington, VA: Na- tional Science Foundation. Potential Gas Committee. 2002. Report of the Potential Gas Committee. Golden, CO: Colo- rado School of Mines, 316 pp. with companion CD-ROM. Ross, C.E.H., and M. Trewhella. 2001. The resurgence of technology strategy in the oil and gas industry. World Energy 4~2~:88-93. Sen, C.T. 2003. Frontier gas resources II: Trends and developments in the LNG industry. Pp. 89-98 in Potential Gas Agency, Report of the Potential Gas Committee, Golden, CO: Colorado School of Mines. Shanley, K.W., R.M Cluff, L.T. Shannon, and J.W. Robinson. In press. Factors controlling prolific gas production from low-permeability sandstone reservoirs: Implications for resource assessment, prospect development, and risk analysis. AAPG Bulletin. Sherwood, K.W., and J.D. Craig. 2001. Prospects for Development of Alaska Natural Gas: A Review. Anchorage, AK: Minerals Management Service, 135 pp. Available at http:// www. mms.gov/alaska/re/reports/rereport. him. Sorensen, S.B., H.E. Syms, and V. Armen, 2000. Estimated Oil and Gas Reserves Pacific Outer Continental Shelf (as of December 31, 1998~. OCS Report MMS Report 2000-063. Camarillo, CA: Minerals Management Service, 34 pp. U.S. Department of Energy. 2002. Office of Natural Gas and Petroleum Import and Export Activities Quarterly Report for Fourth Quarter, 2001. Washington, DC: Department of Energy, 138 pp. Available at http://www.fe.doe.gov/oil_gas/im_ex/analyses/selectqrsections. html. U.S. Departments of Interior, Agriculture, and Energy. 2003. Scientific Inventory of Onshore Federal Lands' Oil and Gas Resources and Reserves and the Extent and Nature of Re- strictions or Impediments to Their Development, BLM/WO/GI-03/002+3100, Wash- ington, DC. 161 pp. Available at http://www.doi.gov/eyca/. USGS. 1998. The Oil and Gas Resource Potential of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 1002 Area, Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 98-34. USGS. 2000. U.S. Geological Survey World Petroleum Assessment 2000: Description and Results. Denver, CO: USGS. Available at http://www.geology.cr.usgs.gov/energy/ WorldEnergy/DDS-60. White, D.A. 1992. Selecting and assessing plays: The business of petroleum exploration. Pp. 87-93 in R. Steinmetz (ed.), The Business of Petroleum Exploration, Treatise of Petro- leum Geology, Handbook of Petroleum Geology, Tulsa, OK: American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Wolfe, R.M. 2000. Research and Development in Industry: 1998, NSF 01-305. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 221 pp.

OCR for page 83