Click for next page ( 47


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 46
References CID (Central Internet Database). 2003. A database that describes Department of Energy waste and site cleanup programs. Available at: . Cvetkovich, George, Michael Siegrist, Rachel Murray, and Sarah Tragesser. 2002. "New Information and Social Trust: Asymmetry ant! Perseverance of Attributions about Hazarc! Managers." Risk Analysis 22:359-367. DOE (Department of Energy).1993. Earning Public Trust and Confidence: Requisites for Managing Radioactive Wastes. Final Report of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Task Force on Radioactive Waste Management. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. November. DOE. 1996. Closing the Circle on the Splitting ofthe Atom: The Environmental Legacy of Nuclear Weapons Production in the United States and What the Department of Energy Is Doing About It. DOE/EM-0266. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. DOE. 1997. Integrated Data Base Report 1996: U.S. Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive Waste Inventories, Projections, and Characteristics. DOE/RW-0006, Rev. 13. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. December. DOE. 2001. Summary Data on the Radioactive Waste, Spent Nuclear Fuel, and Contaminatecl Media Managed by the U.S. Department of Energy. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. DOE. 2002. The Cost of Waste Disposal: Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Disposal of Department of Energy Low-Leve! Radioactive Waste at Federal and Commercial Facilities. Report to Congress. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. July. DOE. 2003. United States of America National Report: loins Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management ant! on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. DOE/EM-0654. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. May. DunIap, Riley E., Michael E. Kraft, ant! Eugene A. Rosa, (eds.~. 1993. Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens' Views of Repository Siting. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. GAO (General Accounting Office). 1999. Low-Level Raclioactive Wastes: States are not developing disposal facilities. GAO/RCED-99-238. Washington, D.C.: GAO. GAO. 2000. Low-Level Radioactive Wastes: Department of Energy Has Opportunities to Reduce Disposal Costs. GAO/RCED-00-64. Washington, D.C.: GAO. HPS (Health Physics Society). 2002. State and Federal Action is Needed for Better Control of Orphan Sources. A position statement of the Health Physics Society. Available at . IAEA international Atomic Energy Agency). 2001. Cocle of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources. L\EA/CODEOC/2001. Vienna, Austria: IAEA. 46

OCR for page 46
MacGregor, D.G., Flynn, J., SIovic, P. and Mertz, C.K. (2002~. Perception of Radiation Exposure, Part 1: Perception of Risk and Judgment of Harm. A report prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Low Dose Racliation Research Program. Eugene, Oregon: Decision Research. MIMS (Manifest Information Management System). 2003. A database of low-level waste shipments to commercial disposal facilities. Available at . Mohanty, Sitakanta and Bubhi Sagar. 2002. Importance of Transparency and Traceability in BuiTcling a Safety Case for High-Level Nuclear Waste Repositories. Risk Analysis 22:7-16. NCRP (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement). 2002. Risk-Based Classification of Radioactive and Hazardous Chemical Wastes. NCRP Report No. ~39. Bethesda, Maryland: NCRP. NRC (National Research Councils. 1986. Scientific Basis for Risk Assessment and Management of Uranium Mill Tailings. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. ~ 990. Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR V. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. ~ 996. Review of New York State Low-Leve] Radioactive Waste Siting Process. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. ~ 998. A Review of Decontamination and Decommissioning Technology Development Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. ~ 999a. Evaluation of Guidelines for Exposures to Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Raclioactive Materials. Washington, D.C.: National Acaclemy Press. NRC. l999b. The State of Development of Waste forms for Mixed Wastes. Washington, D.C.. National Academy Press. . NRC. 2001 a. Disposition of High-Leve! Waste ant! Spent Nuclear Fuel: The Continuing Societal and Technical Challenges. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2001b. Improving the Operations and Long-Term Safety of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Final Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2002a. The Disposition Dilemma: Controlling the Release of Solid Materials from Nuclear Regulatory Commission-Licensed Facilities. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2002b. Characterization of Remote-Hancilect Transuranic Waste for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Final Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2002c. Research Opportunities for Managing the Department of Energy's Transuranic and Mixed Wastes. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2003. One Step at a Time: The Staged Development of Geologic Repositories for High- Leve] Radioactive Waste. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Parrington, I., H.D. Knox, S.L. Breneman, E.M. Baum, and F. Feiner. 1996. NucTides and Isotopes. ~ 5th Ed. San lose, California: General Electric Co. and ~PL, Inc. Rosa, Eugene A. and Donald L. Clark, Ir. 1999. Historical Roots toTechnological Gridlock: Nuclear Technology as Prototypical Vehicle. Research in Social Problems ant! Public Policy 7:21-57. SIovic, Paul. 1993. Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy. Risk Analysis 13:675-682. St. Onge, R. 2003. Operating and Decommissioning LLRW: Power Generators' Perspective. Presented at the 18~ Annual International Radioactive Exchange LLRW Decosionmakers' forum and Technical Symposium. Park City, Utah. June 17-20. Turner, R. 2003. The Metal Industry's View on Unrestricted and/or Limited Metal Recycle/Release into the Commercial Market. Presented at the 1 8th Annual International Radioactive Exchange LLRW Decosionmakers' forum and Technical Symposium. Park City, Utah. June 17-20. USNRC (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission).2002. Radioactive Waste: Production, Storage, Disposal. NUREG/BR-0216, Rev. 2. Washington, D.C: Of floe of Public Affairs. May Interim Report 47