| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 41
3
SEA-ICE FEEDBACKS
SUMMARY
ice anct snow in high latitudes, and in particular sea ice, contribute
importantly to climate sensitivity through ice-albedo feedback, but the
magnitude of this feedback remains uncertain. Ice-albedo feedback in polar
regions is coupled strongly to polar cloud processes and ocean heat
transport. Better monitoring of polar ice distributions and associated
atmospheric and oceanic properties is needed. Systematic global
observations of sea-ice thickness are needed, but a system to make these
measurements is unavailable. Improvements are needed in the
parameterization of sea-ice growth, associated heat and freshwater fluxes,
the variable surface albedo, and polar clouds.
Parameterizations of snow and ice processes in climate models and their
effect on climate sensitivity need to be tested against observations using an
appropriate set of metrics. Further development and distribution of satellite
and in situ datasets describing variations of polar ice and polar clouds should
be a priority.
Various positive feedbacks and other important linkages between the
atmosphere and Earth's surface occur through sea-ice processes, which
themselves are subject to conditions in the ocean's surface layer. At high
latitudes when the ocean surface temperature drops to about -1.8°C, sea ice
forms on the ocean surface. Ice has a strong impact on climate because the
associated feedbacks are positive and large. The presence of sea ice both
insulates air-sea heat exchange and increases the surface albedo, thereby
affecting climate through a reduction in oceanic sensible and latent heat loss
to the atmosphere, and reducing the amount of absorbed incoming solar
radiation, respectively. Albedo effects are also linked with cloud radiation
4
'1
OCR for page 42
42
UNDERSTANDING CLIME TE CHANGE FEEDBACKS
balances in ice-covered regions. Ice insulation has a weaker direct effect on
climate since sensitivity to ocean surface temperatures is low in high
latitudes, but indirectly the impact could be large since ice extent partially
depends on underlying ocean conditions. In addition, sea ice represents a
source of freshwater that through advection from one location to another can
affect the properties of deep and intermediate water formation in the ocean.
Sea ice is a highly responsive component of the global climate system
due to its high albedo and its participation in the hydrologic cycle. The IPCC
TAR identified the coupling between sea ice and atmosphere and between
sea ice and ocean to be of great importance in defining the sensitivity of the
global system. Important sensitivities include the feedback between surface
albedo and ice extent and properties; the ice-insulating effect; and the
relationship between the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation and sea-ice
export through Pram Strait.
Of these the albedo feedback is the greatest influence. A perturbation to
the surface energy balance of the sea ice results in a perturbation to ice area,
surface temperature, melt pond and lead fraction, snow depth, ice thickness
and other sea-ice characteristics. A positive (warming) perturbation will lead
to an increase in the amount of solar radiation that is absorbed by the planet.
Thus, increases in the temperature cause increases in the amount of solar
radiation absorbed by the surface, leading to further increases in
temperature. This association of temperature, ice cover and characteristics,
and albedo is called ice-albedo feedback. Ice albedo feedback is a positive
feedback process in that it amplifies the temperature response to climate
forcing. However, until our physical understanding of the component
processes is improved, the interdependence among these processes remains
unquantified.
The magnitude and even the sign of some of the other polar feedback
processes are also associated with significant uncertainties. Much of this
uncertainty is related to cloud radiation feedbacks and how polar cloud
characteristics will be altered in a changing climate. Because of the impact
of clouds on the surface radiation flux and thus the state of the sea-ice
surface, the cloud radiation feedback processes in the polar regions are
inextricably linked with sea ice and snow feedback processes. Our best
estimate at present is that all of the individual cloud, snow, and sea-ice
feedbacks in the polar regions are positive, with the exception of the aerosol-
dehydration feedback. It remains a major task in climate modeling to explain
the relative stability of the polar climate in the presence of these positive
feedbacks. Possibilities include unexpected negative cloud feedbacks, or
negative feedbacks between the sea ice and ocean.
OCR for page 43
SEA-ICE FEEDBACKS
43
Outlined below are some of the potentially most important polar
feedbacks. These feedbacks should not be viewed as mutually independent,
but rather as interconnected components of a complex system.
OVERVIEW OF SEA-ICE FEEDBACKS
Ice-Albedo Feedback
Warming of high latitudes can decrease the areal extent of sea ice,
especially in the summer, leading to a decrease in surface albedo and an
increase in the absorption of solar radiation at Earth's surface, which would
favor further warming. In model studies the magnitude of the positive ice-
albedo feedback has been seen to increase by the inclusion of melt ponds,
and to diminish by the inclusion of ice thickness distribution and ridging.
Ice Insulating Feedback
Warming of high latitudes decreases the areal extent of sea ice,
especially in the summer, providing an enhancement to the warming through
removing the insulating effect of sea ice on air-sea heat exchange (Manatee
and Stouffer, 1980~.
Meridional Overturning Circulation and SST-Sea-Ice Feedback
While the actual future path of the Atlantic meridional overturning
circulation (MOC) is not known, it is possible that in the short term the
ocean could act as a negative feedback to high-latitude warming (Bryan, et
al. 1988; Gent, 2001~. The role of deep ocean heat in the Antarctic subpolar
gyres (delivered by the MOC) plays a critical role in regulating the thickness
of the insulating Antarctic sea-ice cover (Martinson, 1990~. Consequently,
one may assume that any change in the MOC may result in a change in this
deep ocean heat content and thus the sea-ice thickness. The latter will impact
the length of the sea-ice season, insulating effectiveness, freshwater
transport by sea-ice drift, and deep and intermediate water formation
(feeding back into the MOC directly). It is difficult to predict the nature of
the sign of the net feedback, since we need a better understanding of how
changes in the MOC may impact the properties of the subpolar deepwaters.
OCR for page 44
44
UNDERSTANDING CLIMA TE CHANGE FEEDBACKS
The net change will depend upon the balance of a variety of detailed local
air-sea-ice exchange processes, and this is difficult to estimate in typical
low-resolution climate models.
Ice Cloud Feedback Processes
Because of the impact of clouds on the surface radiation flux and thus
the state of the sea-ice surface, cloud radiation feedback processes in the
Arctic are inextricably linked with albedo feedback processes. A
perturbation in the surface radiation balance of the snow or ice, which could
be produced by input of greenhouse gases and aerosols, results in a change
in snow or ice characteristics (i.e., ice thickness and areal distribution,
surface temperature, and surface albedo). These changes in surface
characteristics, particularly the surface temperature and fraction of open
water, will modify fluxes of radiation and surface sensible and latent heat,
which will modify the atmospheric temperature, humidity, and dynamics.
Modifications to the atmospheric thermodynamic and dynamic structure will
modify cloud properties (e.g., cloud fraction, cloud optical depth), which
will in turn modify the radiative fluxes.
DEVELOPING A SCIENTIFIC STRATEGY
The polar climate community is poised to make rapid progress in these
areas. In particular the United States is uniquely positioned to improve our
understanding of these feedbacks, because many of the relevant satellite
datasets are being developed in the United States, and some of the relevant
modeling activity is concentrated here as well.
Many of the assembled datasets are already in place, or field campaigns
are planned that will address deficiencies in in situ data requirements. The
one caveat to this assessment is the paucity of ice thickness data over large
space and time scales. There remain serious technological difficulties in
making extensive observations of this type. It may require further
development of upward-looking sonar (ULS) technology before reliable
collection will be possible.
Two of the other potential impediments to progress are insufficient data-
processing and archival facilities and inadequate funding for creating
detailed climate-quality satellite datasets (e.g., NRC, 2000b) over longer
time periods. Another point worth noting is that most current funding
addresses specific science questions. We view this favorably. However,
OCR for page 45
SEA-ICE FEEDBACKS
45
insufficient funding has been available for developing the necessary new
monitoring technologies, large datasets, and comprehensive models.
Specific strategies for characterizing and reducing the uncertainty in
polar feedbacks need to consider not just cloud processes and sea-ice
processes but linkages between them and the relationships between these
processes and interannual variability.
Observations
The most comprehensive source of sea-ice data of large space and time
scales is satellite-derived data, which includes sea-ice concentration, snow
extent and ice motion from passive microwave data, sea-ice concentration
from MODIS and leads from the Advanced Very High Resolution
Radiometer (AVHRR). Some ice thickness data may become available from
Icesat (Zwally et al. 2002~. Less extensive data from, for example, the Arctic
and Antarctic Drifting Buoy programs and ice draft from ULS add in situ
data.
In addition, an unprecedented Arctic sea-ice dataset is being assembled
under the auspices of the U.S. Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean
(SHEBA) project (Uttar et al., 2002~. High-quality surface data is available
at the SHEBA ice camp in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas; aircraft
observations were made during a four-month period in a region over the
Beaufort and Chukchi seas, and several satellite remote-sensing groups are
focusing on the SHEBA field season of October 1997 to October 1998.
Several remotely sensed datasets will be made available on a basin-scale for
this project. These data should be fully utilized to advance understanding
and improve model parameterizations.
Although not directly related to ice, an understanding and correct
simulation of the cloud radiation feedback in polar regions requires
observations of (1) cloud fractional coverage and vertical distribution as the
vertical temperature and humidity profiles change, and (2) changes in cloud
water content, phase, and particle size as atmospheric temperature and
composition changes. The largest uncertainty in assessing the cloud-climate
feedback mechanism is the change in cloud cover in response to a change in
atmospheric temperature. Even the sign of the cloud-climate feedback over
the Arctic is unknown. Cloud radiation feedbacks and the required
observations are also discussed in Chapter 3.
Because of the different thermodynamic and radiative environment in
the polar regions, conclusions drawn for the globe regarding these feedback
processes may be inappropriate over the Arctic and Antarctic. Detailed
OCR for page 46
46
UNDERSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE FEEDBACKS
satellite datasets must be extended to include Antarctic products at the same
level of detail as for the Arctic. In addition, the record length of detailed
satellite datasets must be extended to account for interannual variability and
characterization of ice thickness must be extended in time and space.
To advance understanding and thereby possibly reduce uncertainty
about important cryospheric feedback processes, the committee recommends
that detailed satellite datasets must be extended to include Antarctic
products at the same level of detail as for the Arctic. In additions detailed
satellite datasets must be extended in time and space to account for
interannual variability and characterization of ice thickness.
The ability of climate models to simulate the observed annual cycle of
sea-ice extent, thickness, and concentration should be carefully tested. In
addition, the interannual variations of these quantities in free-running
climate models should be compared against observations.
Modeling
The state of the art in sea-ice modeling is fairly advanced relative to
what is currently being used in most state-of-the-art climate models. Most if
not all major coupled climate models have crude representations of sea-ice
physics. Some models still use a purely thermodynamic treatment of sea ice
and others often only incorporate crude representations of sea-ice dynamics
(e.g., cavitating fluid, free drift). Climate models show strong sensitivity to
sea-ice representations (Holland et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2003~. It is difficult
to assess the importance of sea-ice-climate feedbacks without coupling sea-
ice models to prognostic ocean and atmosphere models. It can be argued that
on large scales, the use of current, state-of-the-art parameterizations of ice
dynamics and correct atmospheric dynamical forcing will lead to reasonable
simulations of ice extent, if the ice thermodynamics is well represented.
Local thermodynamic processes (even over multiyear ice) and exchange
with the atmosphere influence surface type and hence albedo. The detailed
exchanges of heat and freshwater with the atmosphere and ocean are
processes that disciplinary modelers (ice, ocean and atmosphere) often
neglect. These interracial processes are crucial to an understanding of sea-ice
feedbacks.
Taken together the uncertainties outlined in Chapter 3 on water vapor
and cloud feedbacks highlight several areas of priority where substantial and
rapid scientific advances can be made in the areas of process
parameterization and model development, especially in light of improved
and expanded datasets.
1
OCR for page 47
SEA-ICE FEEDBACKS
47
In the area of sea-ice feedbacks our general modeling recommendations
are the following. Initiatives should be developed to improve the
parameterization of new sea-ice growth and its associated heat and
freshwater fluxes, snow over sea ice (especially the surface temperature)
and surface albedo that responds to surface ice characteristics, including
melt ponds. In addition, parameterizations are urgently needed for the
unique properties of Arctic and Antarctic clouds. We also recommend that
major U.S. modeling groups incorporate and rigorously test more
sophisticated treatments of sea ice and related parameterizations in coupled
models.
Representative terms from entire chapter:
feedback processes