statistical procedures, the effect of day-to-day variation can be discounted and an estimated distribution of usual intakes can be derived. For most nutrients the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) cut-point method2 can be applied to estimate the proportion of the population with usual intakes that are insufficient to meet their nutrient requirements. A probability approach is required for iron and protein, however, because the requirement distributions of these nutrients are not symmetrical. These assessment methods are outlined in the DRI reports for these nutrients (IOM, 2001, 2002a).

As noted in the DRI assessment report (IOM, 2000a), it is not possible to estimate the population prevalence of inadequacy for a nutrient for which there is an Adequate Intake (AI) and no EAR. Since AIs have been determined using different methodologies and assumptions, consideration must first be given to how the AI was established. Only when the AI was set as the median intake of the nutrient by a healthy population (i.e., for pantothenic acid, vitamin K, chromium, manganese, and n-6 and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids) can any degree of inadequacy be determined, and then only in a very limited way. Groups with mean intakes at or above the AI can generally be assumed to have a low prevalence of inadequate intakes. When mean intakes are below the AI, assumptions about adequacy cannot be made unless intakes approach zero. For all other AIs no quantitative measure of adequacy can be made. However other evidence, such as a direct measure of inadequacy with biological tests and measures of long-term health benefits with other biomarkers, should be used to validate intake data and as the basis for assessing adequacy in the absence of other information.

Once the prevalence of inadequacy for a particular nutrient has been assessed in a nationally representative sample of individuals, further review is required to determine whether there is sufficient evidence of public health need to scientifically justify the addition of a nutrient to the food supply through discretionary fortification. There is little published research on the impact of discretionary fortification practices on nutrient intakes or on the prevalence of nutrient inadequacy or excess. Although there is a growing body of literature on the effect of mandatory fortification(enrichment) (e.g., the addition of folic acid to standardized cereal and grain products) (Bailey et al., 2003; Mills et al., 2003; Quinlivan and Gregory,


“With this method, the population prevalence of inadequate intakes is simply the proportion of the population with intakes below the median requirement (EAR)” (IOM, 2000a, p. 81).

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement