National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$59.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Dietary Supplements: A Framework for Evaluating Safety (2005)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager

. "3 The Framework." Dietary Supplements: A Framework for Evaluating Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
105
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Dietary Supplements: A Framework for Evaluating Safety

TABLE 3-4 Spectrum of Relative Concerns with Clinical Studies Data

Increasing Concern

Describes a serious adverse event, but with less information than would justify moderate or strong concern, and/or the interpretation of the clinical study is hampered by the presence of prominent confounding factors (e.g., multiple concomitant substances and/or conditions) that could not be controlled by balancing

AND/OR

Prominent methodological concerns (e.g., unexplained high level of dropouts, lack of control groups)

Nonsignificant, but clinically important, trend of a higher rate of a serious adverse event

OR

Abnormalities in clinical laboratory values

OR

Other abnormalities, such as electrocardiographic findings in the dietary supplement ingredient group

A significantly higher incidence of a serious adverse event

OR

Other potentially dangerous abnormalities, such as in clinical laboratory values that are associated with risk of serious adverse events

OR

Other abnormalities, such as electrocardiographic findings in the dietary supplement ingredient group

TABLE 3-5 Spectrum of Relative Concerns with Epidemiological Data

Increasing Concern

Case-control or cohort study (including registries), with small,a but statistically significant, relative risk or odds ratio of a serious adverse event

OR

Large relative risk or odds ratio of a serious adverse event that is not statistically significant

OR

Poorly conducted studies with large or significant effects

Case-control or cohort study (including registries), with moderate, statistically significant relative risk or odds ratio of a serious adverse event

OR

Moderate relative risk or odds ratio of a serious adverse event that is not statistically significant but that implies a trend

Well-conducted case-control or cohort study (including registries), with large, statistically significant relative risk or odds ratio of a serious adverse event

a In short, 2 or less is generally considered weak association, and 3 or more is considered strong, but this is only a very general “rule of thumb” guidance, which is somewhat debatable.

Page
105
Front Matter (R1-R20)
Executive Summary (1-18)
1 Introduction and Background (19-42)
2 Approaches Used by Others and Existing Safety Frameworks (43-84)
3 The Framework (85-125)
4 Categories of Scientific Evidence--Human Information and Data (126-155)
5 Categories of Scientific Evidence--Animal Data (156-174)
6 Categories of Scientific Evidence--Information About Related Substances (175-216)
7 Categories of Scientific Evidence--In Vitro Data (217-234)
8 Interactions (235-246)
9 Vulnerable Groups and Prevalance of Use (247-252)
10 Scientific Principles for Integrating and Evaluating the Available Data (253-268)
11 Applying the Framework: Case Studies Using the Prototype Safety Monographs (269-291)
12 Factors Influencing Use of the Safety Framework (292-296)
13 Findings and Recommendations (297-306)
Appendix A: Existing Frameworks or Systems for Evaluating the Safety of Other Substances (307-315)
Appendix B: Scope of Work and Comments to Initial July 2002 Framework (316-321)
Appendix C: Plant Family Information (322-355)
Appendix D: Chaparral: Prototype Monograph Summary (356-362)
Appendix E: Glucosamine: Prototype Monograph Summary (363-366)
Appendix F: Melatonin: Prototype Monograph Summary (367-371)
Appendix G: Chromium Picolinate: Prototype Monograph Summary (372-375)
Appendix H: Saw Palmetto: Prototype Monograph Summary (376-379)
Appendix I: Shark Cartilage: Prototype Monograph Summary (380-384)
Appendix J: Prototype Focused Monograph: Review of Liver-Related Risks for Chaparral (385-449)
Appendix K: Protoype Focused Monograph: Review of Anti-Androgenic Risks of Saw Palmetto Ingestion by Women (450-477)
Appendix L: Acknowledgements (478-480)
Appendix M: Biographical Sketches of Commitee Members (481-488)
Index (489-506)