National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$59.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Dietary Supplements: A Framework for Evaluating Safety (2005)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager

. "4 Categories of Scientific Evidence--Human Information and Data." Dietary Supplements: A Framework for Evaluating Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
154
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Dietary Supplements: A Framework for Evaluating Safety

FDA. 2003b. FDA News. FDA Proposes Labeling and Manufacturing Standards for All Dietary Supplements. Online. Available at http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2003/NEW00876.html. Accessed July 2, 2003.

FDA. 2003c. Safety reporting requirements for human drug and biological products. Proposed rule. Fed Regis 68:12406–12497.

Finney DJ. 1971. Statistical aspects of monitoring for dangers in drug therapy. Methods Inf Med 10:1–8.

Fletcher AP. 1991. Spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting vs event monitoring: A comparison. J R Soc Med 84:341–344.


GAO (General Accounting Office). 1992. Cross Design Synthesis: A New Strategy for Medical Effectiveness Research. GAO/PEMD-92-18. Washington, DC: GAO.

Gardner MJ, Machin D, Campbell MJ. 1986. Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies. Br Med J 292:810–812.

Goldman SA. 1996. The Clinical Impact of Adverse Event Reporting. A MedWatch Continuing Education Article. Food and Drug Administration. Available at http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/articles.htm. Accessed February 25, 2003.

Goldman SA. 1998. Limitations and strengths of spontaneous reports data. Clin Ther 20:C40–C44.

Goldman SA, Kennedy DL, Lieberman R, eds. 1995. Clinical Therapeutics and the Recognition of Drug-Induced Disease. A MedWatch Continuing Education Article. Food and Drug Administration. Available at http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/articles.htm. Accessed June 4, 2003.

Griggs B. 1997. Green Pharmacy. The History and Evolution of Western Herbal Medicine. 2nd ed. Rochester, VT: Healing Arts Press.


Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Mayrent SL. 1987. Epidemiology in Medicine. Boston: Little, Brown.

Hill AB. 1971. Principles of Medical Statistics. 9th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.


ICH (International Conference on Harmonisation). 1995. Guidance for Industry. E3. Structure and Content of Clinical Study Reports. Rockville, MD: Drug Information Branch, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA.

Ioannidis JP, Lau J. 2001. Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: An evaluation of 7 medical areas. J Am Med Assoc 285:437–443.

Ioannidis JPA, Chew P, Lau J. 2002. Standardized retrieval of side effects data for metaanalysis of safety outcomes: A feasibility study in acute sinusitis. J Clin Epidemiol 55:619–626.


Karch FE, Smith CL, Kerzner B, Mazzullo JM, Weintraub M, Lasagna L. 1976. Adverse drug reactions—A matter of opinion. Clin Pharmacol Ther 19:489–492.

Kessler DA. 1993. Introducing MEDWatch: A new approach to reporting medication and device adverse effects and product problems. J Clin Res Drug Dev 7:183–190.

Koch-Weser J, Sellers EM, Zacest R. 1977. The ambiguity of adverse drug reactions. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 11:75–78.


Lewis JA. 1981. Post-marketing surveillance: How many patients? Trends Pharmacol Sci 2:93–94.


Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. 2001. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 1:2–8.


OIG (Office of Inspector General). 2001. Adverse Event Reporting for Dietary Supplements. An Inadequate Safety Valve. Online. Food and Drug Administration. Available at http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01-00-00180.pdf. Accessed February 26, 2003.


Prance GT, Chadwick DJ, Marsh J, eds. 1994. Ethnobotany and the Search for New Drugs. Ciba Foundation Symposium 185. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Page
154
Front Matter (R1-R20)
Executive Summary (1-18)
1 Introduction and Background (19-42)
2 Approaches Used by Others and Existing Safety Frameworks (43-84)
3 The Framework (85-125)
4 Categories of Scientific Evidence--Human Information and Data (126-155)
5 Categories of Scientific Evidence--Animal Data (156-174)
6 Categories of Scientific Evidence--Information About Related Substances (175-216)
7 Categories of Scientific Evidence--In Vitro Data (217-234)
8 Interactions (235-246)
9 Vulnerable Groups and Prevalance of Use (247-252)
10 Scientific Principles for Integrating and Evaluating the Available Data (253-268)
11 Applying the Framework: Case Studies Using the Prototype Safety Monographs (269-291)
12 Factors Influencing Use of the Safety Framework (292-296)
13 Findings and Recommendations (297-306)
Appendix A: Existing Frameworks or Systems for Evaluating the Safety of Other Substances (307-315)
Appendix B: Scope of Work and Comments to Initial July 2002 Framework (316-321)
Appendix C: Plant Family Information (322-355)
Appendix D: Chaparral: Prototype Monograph Summary (356-362)
Appendix E: Glucosamine: Prototype Monograph Summary (363-366)
Appendix F: Melatonin: Prototype Monograph Summary (367-371)
Appendix G: Chromium Picolinate: Prototype Monograph Summary (372-375)
Appendix H: Saw Palmetto: Prototype Monograph Summary (376-379)
Appendix I: Shark Cartilage: Prototype Monograph Summary (380-384)
Appendix J: Prototype Focused Monograph: Review of Liver-Related Risks for Chaparral (385-449)
Appendix K: Protoype Focused Monograph: Review of Anti-Androgenic Risks of Saw Palmetto Ingestion by Women (450-477)
Appendix L: Acknowledgements (478-480)
Appendix M: Biographical Sketches of Commitee Members (481-488)
Index (489-506)