National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$59.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Dietary Supplements: A Framework for Evaluating Safety (2005)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager

. "11 Applying the Framework: Case Studies Using the Prototype Safety Monographs." Dietary Supplements: A Framework for Evaluating Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
280
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Dietary Supplements: A Framework for Evaluating Safety

European countries. The finasteride example illustrates how functional relatedness can signal concern, as discussed below.

Initial Review: Considering the Nature of the Evidence

The cardiac events reported to FDA were placed in perspective by reviewing whether a pattern of cardiac events existed in clinical trials or published case reports. There was no consistent pattern of serious adverse events reported, and they were largely nonserious or their relevance to saw palmetto was unconvincing. The concern level from the original signal was thus lower and would be unlikely to prompt an integrative evaluation according to the Framework process.

If saw palmetto’s drug status and possible mechanistic similarity to the regulated drug finasteride was the original signal, the initial review may have prompted an integrative evaluation. Investigation of this signal would have revealed in vitro evidence and animal evidence suggesting antiandrogenic effects, such as 5-α-reductase inhibition. Male human reproductive developmental anomalies are a feature of the congenital deficiency of 5-α-reductase, and the prescription 5-α-reductase inhibitor, finasteride, has been found to cause similar anomalies in male rats. Consequently, labeling of finasteride notes that it is contraindicated in women and children. In summary, the information about saw palmetto’s similarity to finasteride and similar drugs should raise concern, consistent with the following guiding principle (see “Constituents Functionally Related to Known Classes of Toxic Compounds” in Chapter 6): “When data (i.e., in vitro or animal data) suggest that a dietary supplement constituent targets a receptor, enzyme, or other biological target in a manner similar to a compound known to be toxic, concern is warranted, especially if the dietary supplement constituent is known to reach the biological target in a relevant concentration.”

Finally, the high prevalence of saw palmetto use is a modifying factor, suggesting an evaluation of the safety of this dietary supplement ingredient might be of value even if initial review did not result in higher concern if resources are available for such a proactive integrative evaluation. Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a very common condition among older men, and the prevalence of saw palmetto use among individuals with this disease is relatively high, suggesting that if saw palmetto were unsafe, the public health impact might be substantial. On the other hand, available evidence does not suggest this dietary supplement ingredient is frequently used in women or male children, the individuals to which the concerns apply.

Page
280
Front Matter (R1-R20)
Executive Summary (1-18)
1 Introduction and Background (19-42)
2 Approaches Used by Others and Existing Safety Frameworks (43-84)
3 The Framework (85-125)
4 Categories of Scientific Evidence--Human Information and Data (126-155)
5 Categories of Scientific Evidence--Animal Data (156-174)
6 Categories of Scientific Evidence--Information About Related Substances (175-216)
7 Categories of Scientific Evidence--In Vitro Data (217-234)
8 Interactions (235-246)
9 Vulnerable Groups and Prevalance of Use (247-252)
10 Scientific Principles for Integrating and Evaluating the Available Data (253-268)
11 Applying the Framework: Case Studies Using the Prototype Safety Monographs (269-291)
12 Factors Influencing Use of the Safety Framework (292-296)
13 Findings and Recommendations (297-306)
Appendix A: Existing Frameworks or Systems for Evaluating the Safety of Other Substances (307-315)
Appendix B: Scope of Work and Comments to Initial July 2002 Framework (316-321)
Appendix C: Plant Family Information (322-355)
Appendix D: Chaparral: Prototype Monograph Summary (356-362)
Appendix E: Glucosamine: Prototype Monograph Summary (363-366)
Appendix F: Melatonin: Prototype Monograph Summary (367-371)
Appendix G: Chromium Picolinate: Prototype Monograph Summary (372-375)
Appendix H: Saw Palmetto: Prototype Monograph Summary (376-379)
Appendix I: Shark Cartilage: Prototype Monograph Summary (380-384)
Appendix J: Prototype Focused Monograph: Review of Liver-Related Risks for Chaparral (385-449)
Appendix K: Protoype Focused Monograph: Review of Anti-Androgenic Risks of Saw Palmetto Ingestion by Women (450-477)
Appendix L: Acknowledgements (478-480)
Appendix M: Biographical Sketches of Commitee Members (481-488)
Index (489-506)