Bibliography

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 2001. Implementing the Government Performance and Results Act for Research: A Status Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309075572/html/.

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 2000. Experiments in International Benchmarking of U.S. Research Fields. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309068983/html/.

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 1999. Evaluating Federal Research Programs: Research and the Government Performance and Results Act.” Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://books.nap.edu/books/0309064309/html/index.html.

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 1996. An Assessment of the National Science Foundation’s Science and Technology Centers Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309053240/html/.

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://books.nap.edu/books/0309050294/html/index.html.

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 1993. Science, Technology, and the Federal Government: National Goals for a New Era. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/NI000193/html/index.html.

Congressional Research Service. 2002. National Science Foundation: Major Research Equipment and Facility Construction, RS21267. Washington, D.C.


England, Merton. 2003. “Big Science, Big Trouble,” Chapter 3, draft manuscript of second volume of his history of NSF.

England, Merton. 1982. A Patron for Pure Science: The National Science Foundation’s Formative Years, 1945-57, NSF 82-24, Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 47
Setting Priorities for Large Research Facility Projects Supported by the National Science Foundation Bibliography Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 2001. Implementing the Government Performance and Results Act for Research: A Status Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309075572/html/. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 2000. Experiments in International Benchmarking of U.S. Research Fields. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309068983/html/. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 1999. Evaluating Federal Research Programs: Research and the Government Performance and Results Act.” Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://books.nap.edu/books/0309064309/html/index.html. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 1996. An Assessment of the National Science Foundation’s Science and Technology Centers Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309053240/html/. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 1994. Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://books.nap.edu/books/0309050294/html/index.html. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 1993. Science, Technology, and the Federal Government: National Goals for a New Era. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/NI000193/html/index.html. Congressional Research Service. 2002. National Science Foundation: Major Research Equipment and Facility Construction, RS21267. Washington, D.C. England, Merton. 2003. “Big Science, Big Trouble,” Chapter 3, draft manuscript of second volume of his history of NSF. England, Merton. 1982. A Patron for Pure Science: The National Science Foundation’s Formative Years, 1945-57, NSF 82-24, Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.

OCR for page 47
Setting Priorities for Large Research Facility Projects Supported by the National Science Foundation National Science Board. 2001. Guidelines for Setting Priority for Major Research Facilities. NSB-01-202. Available online at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/2002/nsb02187/nsb02191.htm. National Science Board. 1974. Criteria for the Selection of Research Projects by the National Science Foundation. NSB-74-300, as approved by the National Science Board at its 167th meeting, October 17-18. Available online at http://www.nsf.gov/nsf/nsfpubs/guide/criteria.htm. National Science Board. 1967. Criteria for the Support of Research by the National Science Foundation. NSB-67-133, approved by National Science Board at its 112th meeting, May 18-19. Available online at http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1967/annualreports/ar_1967_appendix_f.pdf. National Science Board.1965. Big Science: Policies and Procedures Statement. NSB-79-65, adopted by the National Science Board at its 203rd meeting, January 18-19. National Science Foundation. 2001. Guidelines for Planning and Managing the Major Research Equipment Account. Available online at http://www.nsf.gov/home/about/mre01.html. National Science Foundation. 1990. Changes to NSF’s Proposal Review System, Notice No. 109. Arlington, Va. National Research Council. 2003. Large-Scale Biomedical Science: Exploring Strategies for Future Research. National Cancer Policy Board and the Division on Earth and Life Studies, Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309089123/html/. National Research Council. 2002. Progress in Improving Project Management at the Department of Energy: 2002 Assessment. Board on Infrastructure and Constructed Environment, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309089093/html/. National Research Council. 2002. Progress in Improving Project Management at the Department of Energy, 2002 Interim Assessment. Letter Report. Board on Infrastructure and Constructed Environment, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/NI000408/html/. National Research Council. 2001. Astronomy and Astrophysics in the New Millennium. Board on Physics and Astronomy, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309070317/html/. National Research Council. 2001. Progress in Improving Project Management at the Department of Energy. Board on Infrastructure and Constructed Environment, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309082803/html/. National Research Council. 2001. US Astronomy and Physics: Managing an Integrated Program,” Board on Physics and Astronomy, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309076269/html/. National Research Council. 2000. The Owner’s Role in Project Management and Preproject Planning. Board on Infrastructure and Constructed Environment, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309084253/html/. National Research Council. 1999. Cooperative Stewardship: Managing the Nation’s Multidisciplinary User Facilities for Research with Synchrotron Radiation, Neutrons, and High Magnetic Fields. Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309068312/html/.

OCR for page 47
Setting Priorities for Large Research Facility Projects Supported by the National Science Foundation National Research Council. 1999. Improving Project Management in the Department of Energy. Board on Infrastructure and Constructed Environment, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309066263/html/. National Research Council. 1998. A Strategy for Research in Space Biology and Medicine into the Next Century. Space Studies Board, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://books.nap.edu/books/0309060478/html/index.html. National Research Council. 1995. Managing the Space Sciences. Space Studies Board, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/books/NX006980/html/. US Congress. 1991. Facilities Planning at the National Science Foundation. 102nd Congress, 1st session. Hearings before the Science Subcommittee. Committee on Science, Space and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. US Congress. 1991. Planning and Priority-Setting in the National Science Foundation. 102nd Congress, 1st Session. Hearings before the Science Subcommittee. Committee on Science, Space and Technology. US House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

OCR for page 47
Setting Priorities for Large Research Facility Projects Supported by the National Science Foundation This page intentionally left blank.