National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$59.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity (2004)
Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT)

Citation Manager

. "5 Coverage Evaluation: Methods and Background." The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
172
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity
Initial Housing Unit Match

The A.C.E. included a new operation to match P-sample and January 2000 MAF housing units prior to interviewing. The purpose of the match was to facilitate such operations as large block subsampling, telephone interviewing, and matching. Although the P-sample and census address lists were linked, independence was maintained because no changes were carried over from one list to the other as a consequence of the match.

P-Sample Interviewing Technology and Schedule

The A.C.E. used computer-assisted telephone and personal interviewing (CATI/CAPI) to facilitate the accuracy of the information collected and the speed of data capture and processing. The PES used paper-and-pencil methods throughout. The first wave of A.C.E. interviewing began in late April 2000, using the telephone to contact mail return households that provided a telephone number on their census questionnaire and for which there was a clear city-style address. Fully 29 percent of the P-sample household interviews were obtained by telephone. The second wave of interviewing was in person; it began in mid-June and was completed in August, well ahead of the timing achieved in 1990.

Matching Technology

The A.C.E. clerical matching operation, which followed a computer match, was conducted by clerks examining computerized P-sample responses and questionnaire images for census cases in the sampled block clusters. The technology was designed to be user-friendly. Because of complete computerization of the operation, all matching could be done at one location, instead of seven as in 1990.

Treatment of Movers

A major change from 1990 was the treatment of movers. The goal of the 1990 PES was to visit each P-sample address and find out where the current residents usually lived as of Census Day (PES-B). The original design for Integrated Coverage Measurement for 2000 ruled out PES-B because of the plan to use sampling for nonresponse

Page
172