National Academies Press: OpenBook

The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity (2004)

Chapter: Bibliography

« Previous: Glossary and Abbreviations
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Bibliography

Abramson, F. H. (2003, September 17). Special Place/Group Quarters Enumeration. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 5. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Adams, T. S. and E. A. Krejsa (2001). ESCAP II: Results of the Person Followup and Evaluation Followup Forms Review. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 24. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Adams, T. S. and X. Liu (2001). ESCAP II: Evaluation of Lack of Balance and Geographic Errors Affecting Person Estimates. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Adlakha, A. L., J. G. Robinson, K. K. West, and A. Bruce (2003, August 18). Assessment of Consistency of Census Data with Demographic Benchmarks at the Subnational Level. Census 2000 Evaluation O.20. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Alberti, N. (2003, September 25). Data Processing in Census 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 7. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Anderson, M. J. (1988). The American Census: A Social History. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

Anderson, M. J. (2000). Advertising and the census. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 13–14. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Anderson, M. J. and S. E. Fienberg (1999). Who Counts? The Politics of Census-Taking in Contemporary America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Anderson, M. J. and S. E. Fienberg (2001). Counting and estimation: Methodology for improving the quality of censuses—the U.S. 2000 census adjustment decision. Technical report, Department of History, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, and Department of Statistics and Center for Automated Learning and Discovery, Carnegie Mellon University. Paper presented at the International Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Stockholm.

Angueira, T. (2003). 2010 census planning, development, and testing: An update on the 2003 and 2004 census tests. Presentation to the Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, September 11, 2003, Washington, DC.


Baker, G. E. (1986). Whatever happened to the reapportionment revolution in the United States? In B. Grofman and A. Lijphart (Eds.), Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, pp. 257–276. New York: Agathon Press, Inc.

Bankier, M. (1999). Experience with the new imputation methodology used in the 1996 Canadian census with extensions for future censuses. Working Paper 24, Conference of European Statisticians, Session on Statistical Data Editing, Rome, Italy, June 2–4, 1999.

Bankier, M., P. Mason, and P. Poirier (2002). Imputation of demographic variables from the 2001 Canadian census of population. Working Paper 25, Conference of European Statisticians, Session on Statistical Data Editing, Helsinki, Finland, May 27–29, 2002.

Barrett, D. F., M. Beaghen, D. Smith, and J. Burcham (2001). ESCAP II: Census 2000 Housing Unit Coverage Study. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 17. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Barrett, D. F., M. Beaghen, D. Smith, and J. Burcham (2003, February 21). Census 2000 Housing Unit Coverage Study. Census 2000 Evaluation O.3. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Bateman, D. V. (1991). Post Enumeration Survey Evaluation Project P11: Balancing Error Evaluation. 1990 Coverage Studies and Evaluation Memorandum Series M-2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Bauder, M. and D. Judson (2003). Administrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000): Household Level Analysis. Census 2000 Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Baumgardner, S. (2002, November 26). Analysis of the Primary Selection Algorithm. Census 2000 Evaluation L.3.a (Executive Summary Only). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Baumgardner, S. (2003, September 10). Resolution of Multiple Census Returns Using a Re-interview. Census 2000 Evaluation L.3.b (Executive Summary Only). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Baumgardner, S. K., D. A. Moul, R. A. Pennington, R. I. Piegari, H. F. Stackhouse, K. J. Zajac, N. S. Alberti, J. W. Reichert, and J. B. Treat (2001). Quality of 2000 Census Processes. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Beaghen, M., R. Feldpausch, and R. Byrne (2001). ESCAP II: Analysis of Non-Matches and Erroneous Enumerations Using Logistic Regression. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 19. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Beaghen, M. and R. Sands (2002, December 31). Results from the Imputation of Unresolved Enumeration, Residency, and Match Status. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-57. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Bean, S. L. (2001). ESCAP II: Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Matching Error. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 7. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Bean, S. L. (2002, June 20). Evaluation of Matching Error. Census 2000 Evaluation N.14. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Bean, S. L. and D. M. Bauder (2002, December 31). A.C.E. Revision II Report: Census and Administrative Records Duplication Study. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-44. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Bell, W. R. (1993). Using information from demographic analysis in postenumeration survey estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88(423), 1106–1118.

Bench, K. (2002, August 22). Contamination of Census 2000 Data Collected in Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Block Clusters. Census 2000 Evaluation N.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Bentley, M., T. Mattingly, C. Hough, and C. Bennett (2003, April 3). Census Quality Survey to Evaluate Responses to the Census 2000 Question on Race: An Introduction to the Data. Census 2000 Evaluation B.3. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Berkowitz, S. (2001, July 17). Puerto Rico Focus Groups on the Census 2000 Race and Ethnicity Questions. Census 2000 Evaluation B.13. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Berkowitz, S. (2002, July 17). Puerto Rico Focus Groups on Why Households Did Not Mail Back the Census 2000 Questionnaire. Census 2000 Evaluation A.8. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Berning, M. A. (2003). Administrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000): Request for Physical Address Evaluation. Census 2000 Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Berning, M. A. and R. H. Cook (2003). Administrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000): Process Evaluation. Census 2000 Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Binder, D. A. (1996). Comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91(434), 510–512.

Brinson, A. and C. Fowler (2003, February 19). Assessment Report for Data Capture of Paper Questionnaires. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Brownrigg, L. A. (2003, October 16). Ethnographic Social Network Tracing of Highly Mobile People. Census 2000 Evaluation J.2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Brudvig, L. (2003). Analysis of the Social Security Number Validation Component of the Social Security Number, Privacy Attitudes, and Notification Experiment. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Bryant, B. E. (2000). Decennial census: 1990 census. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 158–161. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Burcham, J. L. (2002, April 5). Block Canvassing Operation. Census 2000 Evaluation F.5. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Bureau of the Census (1964). Evaluation and Research Program of the U.S. Censuses of Population and Housing, 1960: Accuracy of Data on Population Characteristics as Measured by CPS-Census Match. ER 60–5. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Bureau of the Census (1970). Evaluation and Research Program of the U.S. Censuses of Population and Housing, 1960: Record Check Study of Accuracy of Income Reporting. ER 60–8. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bureau of the Census (1975a). 1970 Census of Population and Housing Evaluation and Research Program: Accuracy of Data for Selected Housing Characteristics as Measured by Reinterviews. PHC(E)-10. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bureau of the Census (1975b). 1970 Census of Population and Housing Evaluation and Research Program: Accuracy of Data for Selected Population Characteristics as Measured by the 1970 CPS-Census Match. PHC(E)-11. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bureau of the Census (1976). Language Minority, Illiteracy, and Voting Data Used in Making Determinations for the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1975 (Public Law 94-73). Current Population Reports, Population Estimates and Projections. Series P-25, Number 627. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bureau of the Census (1982a). The Meaning of Enumeration. 1990 Planning Conference Series, Number 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bureau of the Census (1982b). User’s Guide—1980 Census of Population and Housing. Part A, Text. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bureau of the Census (1983a). Census of Population and Housing 1980: Public Use Microdata Samples Technical Documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bureau of the Census (1983b). Introduction and Overview of the 1980 Census, Chapter 1. Draft. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bureau of the Census (1984). 1990 census planning. Background paper for the Census Advisory Committee on Population Statistics, Washington, DC.

Bureau of the Census (1992). Assessment of Accuracy of Adjusted Versus Unadjusted 1990 Census Base for Use in Intercensal Estimates: Recommendation. Report of the Committee on Adjustment of Postcensal Estimates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bureau of the Census (1993). 1990 Census of Population and Housing: History—Part A. 1990 CPH-R-2A. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Bureau of the Census (1994, February). Nonresponse Followup Reinterview. 1990 Census of Population and Housing Evaluation and Research Reports: Effectiveness of Quality Assurance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bureau of the Census (1995a, October). 1990 Census of Population and Housing: History—Part B. 1990 CPH-R-2B. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bureau of the Census (1995b, October). 1990 Census of Population and Housing: History—Part C. 1990 CPH-R-2C. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bureau of the Census (1997). Report to Congress—The Plan for Census 2000. Originally issued July 1997; revised and reissued August 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Burt, G. and R. Mangaroo (2003, March 28). Nonresponse Followup (NRFU) Enumerator Training. Census 2000 Evaluation H.7. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Butcher, L. and N. Dunton (1999). Uses of Small-Area Poverty Estimates, Final Report. Kansas City, Missouri: Midwest Research Institute.

Byrne, R., M. Beaghen, and M. H. Mulry (2002, December 31). Clerical Review of Census Duplicates (CRCD). DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-43. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.


Cantwell, P. J., D. McGrath, N. Nguyen, and M. F. Zelenak (2001). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Missing Data Results. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-7. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Carter, N. (2002, September 25). Be Counted Campaign for Census 2000. Census 2000 Evaluation A.3. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Carter, N. and S. Brady (2002, November 14). Date of Reference for Age and Birth Date Used by Respondents of Census 2000. Census 2000 Evaluation H.10. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Caspar, R. A. (2003). Synthesis of Results from the Response Mode and Incentive Experiment. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Chesnut, J. (2003a, September 30). Study of the U.S. Postal Service Reasons for Undeliverability of Census 2000 Mailout Questionnaires. Census 2000 Evaluation A.6.b. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Chesnut, J. (2003b, March 20). Telephone Questionnaire Assistance. Census 2000 Evaluation A.1.a. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Childers, D. (1993). The Impact of Housing Unit Coverage on Person Coverage. Housing Unit Coverage Study Results Memorandum Number 2. Distributed with cover memo from Ruth Ann Killion to Thomas C. Walsh (June 24, 1993). Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Childers, D. R. (2000, January 11). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: The Design Document. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series S-DT-1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Childers, D. R., R. L. Byrne, T. S. Adams, and R. Feldpausch (2001). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Person Matching and Follow-up Results. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-6. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Childers, D. R. and D. A. Fenstermaker (2000). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Overview of Design. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series S-DT-2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Chiu, C. W. F., R. M. Yucel, E. Zanutto, and A. M. Zaslavsky (2001). Using matched substitutes to improve imputations for geographically linked databases. Paper prepared for the August 2001 Joint Statistical Meetings, Indianapolis, IN, and printed in Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA.

Choldin, H. (1994). Looking for the Last Percent: The Controversy over Census Undercount. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.

Christenson, M. (2003, July 14). Puerto Rico Census 2000 Responses to the Race and Ethnicity Questions. Census 2000 Evaluation B.12. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Citro, C. F. (2000a). Advisory committees. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 14–18. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Citro, C. F. (2000b). Editing and imputation. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 195–197. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Citro, C. F. (2000c). Enumeration: Special populations. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 201–206. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Citro, C. F. (2000d). Long form. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 273–277. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Citro, C. F. (2000e). Population estimates and projections. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 300–303. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Assisted by Meyer Zitter.

Clark, J. R. and D. Moul (2003, September 29). Coverage Improvement in Census 2000 Enumeration. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 10. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Clark, S. L., J. Iceland, T. Palumbo, K. Posey, and M. Weismantle (2003, September). Comparing Employment, Income, and Poverty: Census 2000 and the Current Population Survey. Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Commerce Secretary’s 2000 Census Advisory Committee (1995, March). Report to Ronald Brown, U.S. Secretary of Commerce.

Commerce Secretary’s 2000 Census Advisory Committee (1999, January 22). Final Report to William Daley, U.S. Secretary of Commerce.

Conklin, J. (2003, March 12). Evaluation of the Quality of the Data Capture System and the Impact of the Data Capture Mode on the Data Quality. Census 2000 Evaluation K.1.b. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Cresce, A. (2003). Overstatement of More Than One Race in Census 2000. Memorandum dated June 10. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Crowley, M. (2003). Generation X Speaks Out on Civic Engagement and the Decennial Census: An Ethnographic Approach. Census 2000 Ethnographic Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.


Davis, M. and P. Biemer (1991a, July 11). Estimates of P-sample Clerical Matching Error from a Rematching Evaluation. 1990 Coverage Studies and Evaluation Memorandum Series H-2. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Davis, M. and P. Biemer (1991b, July 11). Measurement of the Census Erroneous Enumerations—Clerical Error Made in the Assignment of Enumeration Status. 1990 Coverage Studies and Evaluation Memorandum Series L-2. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Davis, P. P. (2001). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Dual System Estimation Results. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-9. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Dawson, J. A. and D. W. Stoudt (2003, July 15). Automation of Census 2000 Processes. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

de la Puente, M. (2004, February 5). Census 2000 Ethnographic Studies. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 15. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

de la Puente, M. and D. Stemper (2003, September 22). The Enumeration of Colonias in Census 2000: Perspectives of Ethnographers and Census Enumerators. Census 2000 Evaluation J.4. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

del Pinal, J. (2003, September 26). Race and Ethnicity in Census 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 9. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Dempster, A. P., N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39, 1–38.

Dillman, D., J. R. Clark, and M. D. Sinclair (1993). The 1992 simplified questionnaire test: Effects of questionnaire length, respondent-friendly design and request for Social Security numbers on completion rates. In Proceedings of the 1993 Bureau of the Census Annual Research Conference, pp. 8–17. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Dillman, D. A., J. R. Clark, and J. B. Treat (1994). Influence of 13 design factors on completion rates to decennial census questionnaires. Paper presented at the Annual Research Conference of the U.S. Bureau of the Census, Arlington, Va. (March).

Dimitri, C. R. (1999, June). Mail Implementation Strategy. Census 2000 Dress Rehearsal Evaluation Memorandum A1a. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Durbin, T. M. and L. P. Whitaker (1991). Congressional and State Reapportionment and Redistricting: A Legal Analysis. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. 91-292-A. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.


Edwards, W. S. and M. J. Wilson (2003, September 24). Evaluations of the Census 2000 Partnership and Marketing Program. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 6. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Ehrenhalt, A. (1983). Reapportionment and redistricting. In T. E. Mann and N. J. Ornstein (Eds.), The American Elections of 1982, pp. 44–71. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

Eltinge, J. L. (1996). Comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91(434), 513–515.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Ericksen, E. P., L. F. Estrada, J. W. Tukey, and K. M. Wolter (1991). Report on the 1990 Decennial Census and the Post-Enumeration Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy (2001a). Analysis Plan for Further ESCAP Deliberations Regarding the Adjustment of Census 2000 Data for Future Uses. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy (2001b). Report of the Executive Steering Committee for Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Policy on Adjustment for Non-Redistricting Uses. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy (2001c). Report: Recommendation Concerning the Methodology to be Used in Producing Tabulations of Population Reported to States and Localities Pursuant to 13 U.S.C. 141(c). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.


Fairchild, L. (2001). Long Form Direct Variance Estimation Specifications for Census 2000. Working Draft, DSSD Census 2000 Procedures Memorandum Series LL (unnumbered; dated December 21). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Farber, J. (2001a). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Consistency of Post-Stratification Variables. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-10. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Farber, J. (2001b). Quality Indicators of Census 2000 and the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Farley, R. (2001). Identifying with Multiple Races: A Social Movement that Succeeded but Failed? PSC Research Report 01-491. Ann Arbor: Population Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

Fay, R. E. (1992). When are inferences from multiple imputation valid? Paper prepared for the August 1992 Joint Statistical Meetings, Boston, MA, and printed in Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA.

Fay, R. E. (1996). Alternative paradigms for the analysis of imputed survey data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91(434), 490–498.

Fay, R. E. (2001, October 26). ESCAP II: Evidence of Additional Erroneous Enumerations from the Person Duplication Study. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 9. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Feindt, P. and R. Byrne (2000, September 21). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Person Interviewing Results (Prototype). DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Feldpausch, R. (2002). ESCAP II: E-Sample Erroneous Enumerations. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 5 (revised). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Fellegi, I. P. and D. Holt (1976). A systematic approach to automatic edit and imputation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 71(353), 17–35.

Fenstermaker, D. (2002, December 31). A.C.E. Revision II: Summary of Estimated Net Coverage. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-54. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Fienberg, S. E. (2000). Capture-recapture methods. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 49–55. Washington, DC: CQ Press.


Gaines, L. M., L. Gage, and J. J. Salvo (2000). State and local governments: use of census data. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 337–340. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Gerber, E. (2003). Privacy Schemas and Data Collection: An Ethnographic Account. Census 2000 Ethnographic Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Gerber, E., A. Dajani, and M. A. Scaggs (2002). An Experiment to Improve Coverage Through Revised Roster Instructions. Census 2000 Alternative Questionnaire Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Green, A., R. Watson, D. Smith, D. Barrett, R. Byrne, and S. Spratt (2003). Evaluation of Housing Unit Field Operations and Instruments for the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. Census 2000 Evaluation N.19. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Green, S. and C. Rothhaas (2002, December 10). Evaluation of the Block Splitting Operation for Tabulation Purposes. Census 2000 Evaluation F.16. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Griffin, D. H. and S. M. Obenski (2001, September 28). A Demonstration of the Operational Feasibility of the American Community Survey. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Griffin, R. (2001). Census 2000: Missing Housing Unit Status and Population Data. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-17. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Griffin, R. and D. Haines (2000). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Post-Stratification for Dual System Estimation. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series Q-21. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Griffin, R. and D. Malec (2001). ESCAP II: Sensitivity Analysis for the Assessment of the Synthetic Assumption. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 23. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Griffin, R. A. (2002, December 31). Analysis of Synthetic Assumption. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-49. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Groves, R. M. and M. P. Couper (2002). Designing surveys acknowledging nonresponse. In M. Ver Ploeg, R. A. Moffitt, and C. F. Citro (Eds.), Studies of Welfare Populations: Data Collection and Research Issues, pp. 13–54. Panel on Data and Methods for Measuring the Effects of Changes in Social Welfare Programs, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Guarino, J. (2001). Assessing the Impact of Differential Incentives and Alternative Data Collection Modes on Census Response. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Guarino, J. A., J. M. Hill, and H. F. Woltman (2001). Analysis of the Social Security Number Notification Component of the Social Security Number, Privacy Attitudes, and Notification Experiment. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.


Haines, D. (1999a, September 22). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Logistic Regression Modeling for Poststratification Variable Selection. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series Q-6. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Haines, D. (1999b, September 22). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Poststratification Research Variables and Evaluation Statistics. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series Q-9. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Haines, D. (2000). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Final Post-Stratification Plan for Dual-System Estimation. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series Q-24. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Haines, D. (2002, December 30). Computer Specifications for Person Dual System Estimation Output Files. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-29. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Harris, D. (2003). Racial classification and the 2000 census. Commissioned paper, Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Committee on National Statistics. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Hefter, S. P. (2000). Long Form Weighting Specifications for Census 2000. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures Memorandum Series LL (unnumbered; no date given, 2000 assumed). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Heimovitz, H. K. (2003). Administrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000): Outcomes Evaluation. Census 2000 Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Hill, J. M. and J. D. Machowski (2003, September 29). Master Trace Sample. Census 2000 Evaluation B.6. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Hirschman, C., R. Alba, and R. Farley (2000). The meaning and measurement of race in the U.S. census: Glimpses into the future. Demography 37(2), 381–393.

Hogan, H. (1992). The 1990 Post-Enumeration Survey: An overview. American Statistician 46, 261–269.

Hogan, H. (1993). The 1990 Post-Enumeration Survey: Operations and results. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88(423), 1047–1060.

Hogan, H. (2000a). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 3–5. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Hogan, H. (2000b). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Theory and application. Paper prepared for the Second Workshop of the Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Committee on National Statistics. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

Hogan, H. (2000c, September 27). Data and Analysis to Inform the ESCAP Recommendation. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-1 (prototype). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Hogan, H. (2001a). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Data and Analysis to Inform the ESCAP Report. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Hogan, H. (2001b). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Effect of Excluding “Late Census Adds”. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series Q-43. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Hough, C. L. and F. R. Borsa (2003, September 30). Data Collection in Census 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 13. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Hovland, I. and J. Buckley-Ess (2003, September 30). Puerto Rico. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 14. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Hunter, J., M. de la Puente, and M. Solo (2003, September 11). Comparative Ethnographic Research on Mobile Populations. Census 2000 Evaluation J.3. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.


IBM Business Consulting Services (2003, October 8). Management Evaluation of Census 2000. Census 2000 Evaluation Q.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Imel, J. D. (2003, September 30). Local Census Office Profile for Census 2000. Census 2000 Evaluation H.9. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.


Johanson, C. (2003, September 9). Effectiveness of Variables Used in the Model to Detect Discrepant Results During Reinterview and the Identification of New Variables. Census 2000 Evaluation M.2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Jonas, K. (2002, November 7). Group Quarters Enumeration. Census 2000 Evaluation E.5. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Jonas, K. (2003a, July 31). Census Unedited File Creation. Census 2000 Evaluation L.4. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Jonas, K. (2003b, August 6). Group Quarters Enumeration. Census 2000 Evaluation E.5, Revision 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Jones, J. (2003a, April 8). Housing Unit Duplication in Census 2000. Census 2000 Evaluation O.10. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Jones, J. (2003b, January 21). Person Duplication in the Search Area Measured by the 2000 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. Census 2000 Evaluation O.16. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Jones, J. and D. F. Barrett (2003, June 25). Questionnaire Assistance Centers for Census 2000. Census 2000 Evaluation H.4. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Judkins, D. R. (1996). Comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91(434), 507–510.

Judson, D. H. and B. Bye (2003, October 21). Synthesis of Results from the Administrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.


Kearney, A. T. (2002, December 31). A.C.E. Revision II: Missing Data Evaluation Final Report. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-48. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Keathley, D. (2002, December 31). Report on the Error Due to Estimating Outmovers Using Inmovers in the PES-C. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-47. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Keathley, D. (2003, September 29). Evaluation of Nonresponse Followup—Mover Probe. Census 2000 Evaluation I.3. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Keathley, D., A. Kearney, and W. Bell (2001). ESCAP II: Analysis of Missing Data Alternatives for the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 12. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Keeley, C. (1993). Could the Census Bureau Reduce the Undercount by Not Using a “Long Form?”. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Kilmer, A. (2002, November 5). Census 2000 Count Imputation—Results. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series Q-81. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Kim, J.-k. and W. A. Fuller (2002). Variance estimation for nearest neighbor imputation. Unpublished manuscript.

Kincannon, C. L. (2003, March 12). Statement of Census Bureau director C. Louis Kincannon on Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Revision II. Washington, DC: Public Information Office, U.S. Census Bureau.

Kohn, F. (2003, April 10). The United States Postal Service Undeliverable Rates for Census 2000 Mailout Questionnaires. Census 2000 Evaluation A.6.a. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Kominski, R. (1985). Final Report—Documentation of Voting Rights Act Determinations. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Kominski, R. (1992). 1992 Voting Rights Act Bilingual Ballots Determinations. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Kostanich, D. (Ed.) (2003a, March 11). A.C.E. Revision II: Design and Methodology. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-30. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Kostanich, D. (2003b, January 2). A.C.E. Revision II: Summary of Methodology. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-35. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Kostanich, D., R. Griffin, and D. Fenstermaker (1999). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation survey: Plans for Census 2000. Unpublished paper prepared for the March 19, 1999, meeting of the Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Committee on National Statistics. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.

Krejsa, E. A. (2003, March 25). Discrepant Results in the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. Census 2000 Evaluation N.10. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Krejsa, E. A. and T. S. Adams (2002, December 31). Results of the A.C.E. Revision II Measurement Coding. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-55. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Krejsa, E. A. and D. A. Raglin (2001). ESCAP II: Evaluation Results for Changes in A.C.E. Enumeration Status. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Kulka, R. A., N. A. Holt, W. Carter, and K. L. Dowd (1991). Self-reports of time pressures, concerns for privacy, and participation in the 1990 mail census. In Proceedings of the Bureau of the Census 1991 Annual Research Conference, pp. 33–54. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.


Laney, G. P. (1992). The Voting Rights Act of 1965, As Amended: Its History and Current Issues. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. 92-578-GOV. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Lestina, Frederic Allen, J. (2003, September 30). Analysis of the Linguistically Isolated Population in Census 2000. Census 2000 Evaluation A.5.a. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Little, R. J. A. and D. B. Rubin (1987). Statistical Analysis With Missing Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Liu, X. J., R. L. Byrne, and L. M. Imel (2001). ESCAP II: Analysis of Movers. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 15. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Liu, X. J., R. Feldpausch, and D. Smith (2002, October 15). Analysis of Conflicting Households. Census 2000 Evaluation O.4. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Love, S. and D. Dalzell (2001, March 27). Comparison of record substitution and 100% data allocation. Memorandum for the Record. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.


Macro International (2002, July 10). Evaluation of the Census in Schools Program: Materials and Distribution. Census 2000 Evaluation D.2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Magnuson, D. L. (2000a). Decennial censuses: 1910 census. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 135–136. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Magnuson, D. L. (2000b). Decennial censuses: 1930 census. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 139–140. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Marks, E. S. (1978). The role of dual system estimation in census, evaluation. In K. J. Krotki (Ed.), Developments in Dual Systems Estimation of Population Size and Growth, Chapter 20. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.

Martin, E. (1999). Who knows who lives here? Within-household disagreements as a source of survey coverage error. Public Opinion Quarterly 63, 220–236.

Martin, E. (2001). Privacy concerns and the census long form: Some evidence from census 2000. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, Atlanta, GA. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

Martin, E. (2002). Questionnaire Effects on Reporting of Race and Hispanic Origin: Results of a Replication of the 1990 Mail Short Form in Census 2000. Census 2000 Alternative Questionnaire Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Martin, E., E. Gerber, and C. Redline (2003, August 28). Synthesis Report: Census 2000 Alternative Questionnaire Experiment. Census 2000 Alternative Questionnaire Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Martin, E., D. Sheppard, M. Bentley, and C. Bennett (2003). Results of 2003 National Census Test of Race and Hispanic Questions. Unpublished report, dated October 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

McMillen, D. (2000). Americans overseas. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 31–33. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

McMillen, D. B. (1998). The census under attack. CHANCE 11(2), 50–55.

McNally, T. (2002, November 6). Service-Based Enumeration. Census 2000 Evaluation E.6. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

McNally, T. (2003, May 15). Operational Analysis of Enumeration of Puerto Rico. Census 2000 Evaluation H.8. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Meng, X.-L. (1994). Multiple-imputation inferences with uncongenial sources of input. Statistical Science 9(4), 538–573.

Miskura, S. M. (1993). Definition, Clarification, and Issues: “One-Number Census”. Memorandum dated April 14 for R.D. Tortora. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Miskura, S. M. (2000a). Addresses in the Master Address File (MAF) Excluded from the April 7, 2000 MAF Extract. Census 2000 Informational Memorandum 67. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Miskura, S. M. (2000b). Results of Reinstatement Rules for the Housing Unit Duplication Operations. Census 2000 Informational Memorandum 82. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Morganstein, D., D. Marker, and D. Levine (2003, September 25). Evaluation of the Census 2000 Quality Assurance Philosophy and Approach Used in the Address List Development and Enumeration Operations. Census 2000 Evaluation M.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Moul, D. A. (2002, July 25). Nonresponse Followup for Census 2000. Census 2000 Evaluation H.5. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Moul, D. A. (2003, May 9). Coverage Improvement Followup. Census 2000 Evaluation I.4. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Mule, T. (2001). ESCAP II: Person Duplication in Census 2000. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 20. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Mule, T. (2002a, December 31). A.C.E. Revision II Results: Further Study of Person Duplication. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-51. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Mule, T. (2002b, April 4). Revised Preliminary Estimates of Net Undercounts for Seven Race/Ethnicity Groupings. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Mule, T. (2003, March 4). A.C.E. Revision II Results: Change in Estimated Net Undercount. DSSD A.C.E. Revision II Memorandum Series PP-58. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Mulry, M. H. and R. S. ZuWallack (2002, December 31). Confidence Intervals and Loss Function Analyses. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-42. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.


Nash, F. F. (2000). Overview of the Duplicate Housing Unit Operations.Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

National Conference of State Legislatures (1992). Customer feedback for the 1990 census redistricting data program—a preliminary survey. Prepared for discussion at the National Conference of State Legislatures Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, Ohio.

National Research Council (1978). Counting the People in 1980: An Appraisal of Census Plans. Panel on Decennial Census Plans, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (1985). The Bicentennial Census: New Directions for Methodology in 1990. Panel on Decennial Census Methodology, Constance F. Citro and Michael L. Cohen, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (1987). Letter from Benjamin F. King to John Keane, director, U.S. Bureau of the Census. Panel on Decennial Census Methodology, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (1988). Priorities for the 1990 Census: Research, Evaluation, and Experimentation (REX) Program. Panel on Decennial Census Methodology, Constance F. Citro and Michael L. Cohen, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

National Research Council (1994). Counting People in the Information Age. Panel to Evaluate Alternative Census Methods, Duane L. Steffey and Norman M. Bradburn, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (1995a). Measuring Poverty: A New Approach. Panel on Poverty and Family Assistance: Concepts, Information Needs, and Measurement Methods, Constance F. Citro and Robert T. Michael, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (1995b). Modernizing the U.S. Census. Panel on Census Requirements in the Year 2000 and Beyond, Barry Edmonston and Charles Schultze, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (1996). Spotlight on Heterogeneity—the Federal Standards for Racial and Ethnic Classification: Summary of a Workshop. Barry Edmonston, Joshua Goldstein, and Juanita Tamayo Lott, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (1997). Preparing for the 2000 Census: Interim Report II. Panel to Evaluate Alternative Census Methodologies, Andrew A. White and Keith F. Rust, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (1999a, May). Letter from Janet L. Norwood to Kenneth Prewitt, director, U.S. Census Bureau. Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (1999b). Measuring a Changing Nation: Modern Methods for the 2000 Census. Panel on Alternative Census Methodologies, Michael L. Cohen, Andrew A. White, and Keith F. Rust, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2000a). Designing the 2010 Census: First Interim Report. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Michael L. Cohen and Benjamin F. King, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2000b, November). Letter from Janet L. Norwood to Kenneth Prewitt, director, U.S. Census Bureau. Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

National Research Council (2001a). The 2000 Census: Interim Assessment. Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Constance F. Citro, Daniel L. Cork, and Janet L. Norwood, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2001b). Choosing the Right Formula: Interim Report. Panel on Formula Allocations, Thomas B. Jabine, Thomas A. Louis, and Allen L. Schirm, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2001c). Letter from Benjamin F. King to William G. Barron, acting director, U.S. Census Bureau. Dated February 15. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2001d, November). Letter from Janet L. Norwood to William Barron, acting director, U.S. Census Bureau. Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2001e). Proceedings, First Workshop of Panel to Review the 2000 Census (October 6, 1999). Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2001f). Proceedings, Second Workshop of Panel to Review the 2000 Census (February 2-3, 2000). Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2001g). Proceedings, Third Workshop of Panel to Review the 2000 Census (October 2, 2000). Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2003a). Planning the 2010 Census: Second Interim Report. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Daniel L. Cork, Michael L. Cohen, and Benjamin F. King, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council (2003b). Statistical Issues in Allocating Funds by Formula. Panel on Formula Allocations, Thomas A. Louis, Thomas B. Jabine, and Marisa A. Gerstein, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2004). Reengineering the 2010 Census: Risks and Challenges. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Daniel L. Cork, Michael L. Cohen, and Benjamin F. King, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Navarro, A. and D. Olson (2001). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Effect of Targeted Extended Search. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-18. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Naymark, J. and K. Hodges (2000). Uses of census data by the private sector. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 356–358. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Nguyen, N. T. and M. F. E. Zelenak (2003, June 24). Coverage Gains From Coverage Questions C1 and C2 on Enumerator-Completed Questionnaires for Census 2000. Census 2000 Evaluation I.5. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Norris, S. (2003, September 23). Analysis of Item Nonresponse Rates for the 100 Percent Housing and Population Items from Census 2000. Census 2000 Evaluation B.1.b. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.


O’Rourke, T. G. (1980). The Impact of Reapportionment. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

Owens, K. L. (2000). Census 2000 Address List Review. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Owens, K. L. (2002, May 14). Evaluation of the Local Update of Census Addresses 99 (LUCA 99). Census 2000 Evaluation F.6. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Owens, K. L. (2003, April 16). Evaluation of the Local Update of Census Addresses 98 (LUCA 98). Census 2000 Evaluation F.3. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.


Parker, F. R. (1989). Changing standards in voting rights law. In W. P. O’Hare (Ed.), Redistricting in the 1990s: A Guide for Minority Groups, pp. 55–66. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau, Inc.

Passel, J. S. (2000). Immigration. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 253–260. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Pennington, R. A. (2003, June 6). Evaluation of the Update/Leave Operation. Census 2000 Evaluation F.10. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Petroni, R. and D. R. Childers (2003, August 28). Coverage Measurement from the Perspective of March 2001 A.C.E. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 4. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Philipp, D. (2001, July 16). 2000 Decennial Census Documentation: Sample Census Edited File (SCEF). Washington, DC: Decennial Systems and Contracts Management, U.S. Census Bureau.

Prewitt, K. (2000, June). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Statement on the Feasibility of Using Statistical Methods to Improve the Accuracy of Census 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.


Raghunathan, T. E., J. M. Lepkowski, J. Van Hoewyk, and P. Solenberger (2001). A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology 27(1), 85–95.

Raglin, D. A. (2001). ESCAP II: Effect of Excluding Reinstated Census People from the A.C.E. Person Process. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 13. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Raglin, D. A. and E. A. Krejsa (2001). ESCAP II: Evaluation for Results for Changes in Mover and Residence Status in the A.C.E. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 16. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Rao, J. N. K. and J. Shao (1992). Jackknife variance estimation with survey data under hot deck imputation. Biometrika 79(4), 811–822.

Redline, C., D. Dillman, A. Dajani, and M. A. Scaggs (2002). The Effects of Altering the Design of Branching Instructions on Navigational Performance in Census 2000. Census 2000 Alternative Questionnaire Experiment Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Robinson, J. G. (2000, September 21). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Demographic Analysis Results (Prototype). DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-4. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Robinson, J. G. (2001a). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Demographic Analysis Results. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-4. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Robinson, J. G. (2001b). ESCAP II: Demographic Analysis Results. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Robinson, J. G. and A. Adlakha (2002, December 31). Comparison of A.C.E. Revision II Results with Demographic Analysis. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-41. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Robinson, J. G., B. Ahmed, P. Das Gupta, and K. A. Woodrow (1993). Estimation of population coverage in the 1990 United States census based on demographic analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88(423), 1061–1071.

Robinson, J. G. and G. S. Wolfgang (2002, December 31). Comparison of A.C.E. Revision II Population Coverage Results with HUCS Housing Unit Coverage Results. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-50. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Rochester Institute of Technology Research Corporation (2002, September 20). DCS 2000 Data Quality, v.2.1 Final. Rochester, NY: Rochester Institute of Technology Research Corporation. Prepared for the U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

Rosenthal, M. (2002a, December 10). Update/Enumerate. Census 2000 Evaluation F.12. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Rosenthal, M. (2002b, October 3). Urban Update/Leave. Census 2000 Evaluation F.11. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Rosenthal, M. (2003a, October 24). DCS 2000 Data Capture Audit Resolution Process. Census 2000 Evaluation K.1.a. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Rosenthal, M. (2003b, June 30). Operational Analysis of the Decennial Response File Linking and Setting of Housing Unit Status and Expected Household Size. Census 2000 Evaluation L.2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Rubin, D. B. (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association 91(434), 473–489.

Ruggles, S. (2000). IPUMS. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 264–267. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Ruhnke, M. C. (2002, January 30). The Address Listing Operation and Its Impact on the Master Address File. Census 2000 Evaluation F.2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Ruhnke, M. C. (2003, August 19). An Assessment of Addresses on the Master Address File “Missing” in the Census or Geocoded to the Wrong Collection Block. Census 2000 Evaluation F.15. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.


Salvo, J. J. (2000). Data capture. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 105–108. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. New York: Chapman and Hall.

Schindler, E. (2000, January 12). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Post-stratification Preliminary Research Results. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series Q-23. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Schindler, E. (2001). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.) Survey—Census Imputations by Post-stratum. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series Q-64. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Schindler, E. (2003, April 9). Adjusted Data for States, Counties, and Places. DSSD Revised A.C.E. Estimates Memorandum Series PP-60. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Schneider, P. (2003, September 29). Content and Data Quality in Census 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 12. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Schneider, P. (2004, January 22). Content and Data Quality in Census 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 12 (revised). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Schneider, S., D. Cantor, P. Segel, C. Arieira, and L. Nguyen (2002). Response Mode and Incentive Experiment for Census 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Schwede, L. (2003, August 27). Complex Households and Relationships in the Decennial Census and in Ethnographic Studies of Six Race/Ethnic Groups. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Sheppard, D. (2003, July 29). Coverage Edit Followup. Census 2000 Evaluation I.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Siegel, P. M. (1993). The Impact of Content on Census Coverage. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Singer, E. (2003, June 20). Privacy Research in Census 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Singer, E., J. Van Hoewyk, R. Tourangeau, D. Steiger, M. Montgomery, and R. Montgomery (2001). Final Report on the 1999–2000 Surveys of Privacy Attitudes. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Singer, P. and S. R. Ennis (2002, December 13). Census 2000 Content Reinterview Survey: Accuracy of Data for Selected Population and Housing Characteristics as Measured by Reinterview. Census 2000 Evaluation B.5. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Singer, P. and S. R. Ennis (2003, September 24). Census 2000 Content Reinterview Survey: Accuracy of Data for Selected Population and Housing Characteristics as Measured by Reinterview. Census 2000 Evaluation B.5 (revised and final). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Smith, D., D. F. Barrett, and M. Beaghen (2003, October 17). Analysis of Deleted and Added Housing Units in Census 2000 Measured by the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. Census 2000 Evaluation O.19. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Smith, D. and D. Whitford (2003). Census unduplication research plan for 2010. Paper prepared for the August 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings, San Francisco, CA. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

Smith, D. R. and J. Jones (2003, September 22). Use of Non-English Questionnaires and Guides in the Census 2000 Language Program. Census 2000 Evaluation A.4. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Spar, E. J. (2000). Private sector. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 309–311. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Stackhouse, H. F. and S. Brady (2003a, January 30). Census 2000 Mail Response Rates. Census 2000 Evaluation A.7.a. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Stackhouse, H. F. and S. Brady (2003b, January 30). Census 2000 Mail Return Rates. Census 2000 Evaluation A.7.b. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Stapleton, C. and J. Irwin (2002, April 15). Census 2000 Internet Web Site and Questionnaire Customer Satisfaction Surveys. Census 2000 Evaluation A.2.c. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Starsinic, M. D., C. D. Stissel, and M. E. Asiala (2001). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Variance Estimates by Size of Geographic Area. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-11. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Steel, P. and L. Zayatz (2003, April 15). The Effects of the Disclosure Limitation Procedure on Census 2000 Tabular Data Products. Census 2000 Evaluation C.1. (Abridged). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Stevens, N. (2002, January 30). Telephone Questionnaire Assistance Customer Satisfaction Survey. Census 2000 Evaluation A.1.b. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Stevens, N. (2003, May 27). Evaluation of the Facility Questionnaire (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing and Personal Visit). Census 2000 Evaluation E.1.b. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Stiers, G. (2000, September 26). Demographic Full Count Report. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series B-16. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Stiller, J. and D. R. Dalzell (2003). Hot-deck imputation with SAS™ arrays and macros for large surveys. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, San Francisco, CA. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.


Tenebaum, M. (2001, July 24). Assessment of Field Verification. Census 2000 Evaluation H.2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Thernstrom, A. M. (1979). The odd evolution of the Voting Rights Act. The Public Interest 55(Spring), 49–76.

Thibaudeau, Y. (1998). Model Explicit Item Imputation for Demographic Categories for Census 2000. Statistical Research Division Research Report RR-99-02. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Thompson, J. H. (1992). CAPE Processing Results. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Thompson, J. H. (2000). Organization and administration of the census. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 295–299. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Thompson, J. H., P. J. Waite, and R. E. Fay (2001). Basis of “Revised Early Approximation” of Undercounts Released Oct. 17, 2001. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 9a. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Titan Corporation (2003, July 22). Census 2000 Data Capture. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Titan Systems Corporation (2001a, December 28). Coverage Edit Followup System Requirements Study. Census 2000 Evaluation R.1.b. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Titan Systems Corporation (2001b, December 28). Internet Data Collection System Requirements Study. Census 2000 Evaluation R.1.d. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Titan Systems Corporation (2001c, December 28). Internet Questionnaire Assistance System Requirements Study. Census 2000 Evaluation R.1.c. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Titan Systems Corporation (2001d, December 28). Telephone Questionnaire Assistance System Requirements Study. Census 2000 Evaluation R.1.a. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Titan Systems Corporation (2002a, May 10). Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation 2000 System Requirements Study. Census 2000 Evaluation R.2.c. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Titan Systems Corporation (2002b, June 6). American FactFinder System Requirements Study. Census 2000 Evaluation R.3.b. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Titan Systems Corporation (2002c, August 23). Census 2000 Data Capture System Requirements Study. Census 2000 Evaluation R.3.d. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Titan Systems Corporation (2002d, June 6). Laptop Computers for Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation System Requirements Study. Census 2000 Evaluation R.2.b. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Titan Systems Corporation (2002e, July 22). Management Information System 2000 System Requirements Study. Census 2000 Evaluation R.3.c. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Titan Systems Corporation (2002f, April 17). Matching Review and Coding System for Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (Housing Unit, Person and Final Housing Unit) System Requirements Study. Census 2000 Evaluation R.2.d. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Titan Systems Corporation (2002g, February 28). Operations Control System 2000 System Requirements Study. Census 2000 Evaluation R.2.a. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Titan Systems Corporation (2002h, June 6). Pre-Appointment Management System/Automated Decennial Administrative Management System System Requirements Study. Census 2000 Evaluation R.3.a. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Titan Systems Corporation (2003, January 14). Operational Requirements Study: The Beta Site Systems Testing & Management Facility. Census 2000 Evaluation L.5. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Treat, J. B. (1993). 1993 National Census Test Appeals and Long-Form Experiment, Long-Form Component, Final Report. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Treat, J. B. (2003, September 30). Response Rates and Behavior Analysis. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 11. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Trentham, S. and L. Larwood (2003). Synthesis of Results from the Social Security Number, Privacy Attitudes, and Notification Experiment. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Tucker, C. and B. Kojetin (1996, September). Testing racial and ethnic origin questions in the CPS supplement. Monthly Labor Review, 3–7.


U.S. Census Bureau (1998, November). Census 2000 Operational Plan. Revised. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

U.S. Census Bureau (1999a, December). 1990 Data for Census 2000 Planning [Data CD]. U.S. Department of Commerce.

U.S. Census Bureau (1999b, January). Census 2000 Operational Plan Using Traditional Census-Taking Methods. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

U.S. Census Bureau (2001a). 2000 Census Household Education Edit. Unnumbered specifications document shared with panel (dated May). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

U.S. Census Bureau (2001b, February 16). P-Sample and E-Sample Dual-System Estimation Output Files. DSSD Census 2000 Procedures and Operations Memorandum Series Q-38. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

U.S. Census Bureau (2002a). Specifications for Edit and Allocation of Housing Tenure. Unnumbered specifications document shared with panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

U.S. Census Bureau (2002b). Specifications for Joint Economic Edit, 2000 Census Long Forms. Unnumbered specifications document shared with panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

U.S. Census Bureau (2003a, February). Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Summary Documentation: Program Modifications Since May 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

U.S. Census Bureau (2003b, March 12). Decision on Intercensal Population Estimates. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

U.S. Census Bureau (2003c, March 12). Technical Assessment of A.C.E. Revision II. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

U.S. Census Bureau (2003d). Technical Documentation, Summary File 3, 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

U.S. Census Monitoring Board Congressional Members (1999, September 30). Unkept Promise: Statistical Adjustment Fails to Eliminate Undercounts, as Revealed by Evaluation of Severely Undercounted Blocks from the 1990 Census Plan. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Monitoring Board.

U.S. Census Monitoring Board Congressional Members (2001, May 23). A Guide to Statistical Adjustment: How It Really Works. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Monitoring Board.

U.S. Census Monitoring Board Presidential Members (2001a, September). Final Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Monitoring Board.

U.S. Census Monitoring Board Presidential Members (2001b, April). Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Monitoring Board.

U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Inspector General (1997). Bureau of the Census: Headquarters Information Processing Systems for the 2000 Decennial Census Require Technical and Management Plans and Procedures. OSE-10034-8-0001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

U.S. General Accounting Office (1992). Decennial Census: 1990 Results Show Need for Fundamental Reform.GAO/GGD-92-94. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office (1997, February). High Risk Series: Quick Reference Guide.GAO/HR-97-2. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office (1999a, September). 2000 Census: Analysis of Fiscal Year 2000 Amended Budget Request. Report GAO/AIMD/GGD-99-291. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

U.S. General Accounting Office (1999b). Formula Grants: Effects of the Adjusted Population Counts on Federal Funding to States.GAO/HEHS-99-69. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office (2000a, October). 2000 Census: Headquarters Processing System Status and Risks. GAO-01-1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office (2000b, February). 2000 Census: New Data Capture System Progress and Risks.GAO/AIMD-00-61. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office (2000c, May). 2000 Census: Status of Nonresponse Follow-up and Key Operations.GAO/T-GGD/AIMD-00-164. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office (2000d, September). 2000 Census: Update on Data Capture Operations and System.GAO/AIMD-00-324R. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office (2001a, August). 2000 Census: Review of Partnership Program Highlights Best Practices for Future Operations. Report GAO-01-579. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office (2001b, December). 2000 Census: Significant Increase in Cost Per Housing Unit Compared to 1990 Census. Report GAO-02-31. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office (2002a, February). 2000 Census: Best Practices and Lessons Learned for More Cost-Effective Nonresponse Follow-up. GAO-02-196. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office (2002b). 2000 Census: Complete Costs of Coverage Evaluation Programs Are Not Available. GAO-03-41. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office (2002c). 2000 Census: Lessons Learned for Planning a More Cost-Effective 2010 Census. GAO-03-40. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office (2003a). 2000 Census: Coverage Measurement Programs’ Results, Costs, and Lessons Learned. GAO-03-287. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office (2003b). Decennial Census: Methods for Collecting and Reporting Data on the Homeless and Others without Conventional Housing Need Refinement. GAO-03-227. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Viator, M. A. and N. Alberti (2003, February 20). Evaluation of Nonresponse Followup—Whole Household Usual Home Elsewhere Probe. Census 2000 Evaluation I.2. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Vitrano, F., J. Treat, and R. Pennington (2003a, November 4). Address List Development in Census 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 8 (revised). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Vitrano, F., J. Treat, and R. Pennington (2003b, September 26). Address List Development in Census 2000. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program, Topic Report 8. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.


Waite, P. J., S. M. Obenski, and L. E. Buckley (2001, August). 2010 census planning: The strategy. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, Atlanta, GA. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

Waters, M. C. (1990). Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

West, K. (1991, July). 1990 Post-Enumeration Survey Evaluation Project P9a: Accurate Measurement of Census Erroneous Enumerations—Evaluation Followup. 1990 Coverage Studies and Evaluation Memorandum Series K-2. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

West, K. K. and J. G. Robinson (2001, May). The Use of Demographic Benchmarks to Ensure Census Data Quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Westat (2002a, June 7). Census 2000 Staffing Programs, Pay Component. Census 2000 Evaluation G.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Westat (2002b, June 7). Census 2000 Staffing Programs, Recruiting Component. Census 2000 Evaluation G.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Westat (2002c, May 21). Report of Survey of Partners. Census 2000 Evaluation D.3. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Whitworth, E. (2002, August 14). Internet Data Collection. Census 2000 Evaluation A.2.b. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Wolfgang, G., T. S. Adams, P. Davis, X. Liu, and P. Stallone (2001). ESCAP II: P-Sample Nonmatch Analysis. Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II Supporting Report 18 (revised). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

Wolfgang, G., R. Byrne, and S. Spratt (2003, March 19). Analysis of Proxy Data in the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. Census 2000 Evaluation O.5. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Wolfgang, G., P. Stallone, and T. S. Adams (2002, September 5). Targeted Extended Search Analysis. Census 2000 Evaluation N.17. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Wolter, K., B. Calder, E. Malthouse, S. Murphy, S. Pedlow, and J. Porras (2002, July 17). Partnership and Marketing Program Evaluation. Census 2000 Evaluation D.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Working Group on LUCA (2001). Assessment of the 2000 Census LUCA Program. Washington, DC: Committee on National Statistics.

Wright, T. (2000). Sampling for follow-up of nonresponding households. In M. J. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census, pp. 325–327. Washington, DC: CQ Press.


Zajac, K. J. (2002, May 23). List/Enumerate. Census 2000 Evaluation F.13. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Zajac, K. J. (2003, September 25). Analysis of Item Imputation Rates for the 100 Percent Person and Housing Unit Data Items from Census 2000. Census 2000 Evaluation B.1.a. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Zhao, Z. (2003). Analysis of the Dual System Estimate in the 2000 Census. Ph. D. thesis, Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 533
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 534
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 535
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 536
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 537
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 538
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 539
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 540
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 541
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 542
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 543
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 544
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 545
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 546
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 547
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 548
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 549
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 550
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 551
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 552
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 553
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 554
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 555
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 556
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 557
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 558
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 559
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 560
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 561
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 562
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 563
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 564
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 565
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Research Council. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10907.
×
Page 566
Next: Biographical Sketches of Panel Members and Staff »
The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity Get This Book
×
Buy Hardback | $80.00 Buy Ebook | $64.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The decennial census was the federal government’s largest and most complex peacetime operation. This report of a panel of the National Research Council’s Committee on National Statistics comprehensively reviews the conduct of the 2000 census and the quality of the resulting data. The panel’s findings cover the planning process for 2000, which was marked by an atmosphere of intense controversy about the proposed role of statistical techniques in the census enumeration and possible adjustment for errors in counting the population. The report addresses the success and problems of major innovations in census operations, the completeness of population coverage in 2000, and the quality of both the basic demographic data collected from all census respondents and the detailed socioeconomic data collected from the census long-form sample (about one-sixth of the population). The panel draws comparisons with the 1990 experience and recommends improvements in the planning process and design for 2010. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity will be an invaluable resource for users of the 2000 data and for policymakers and census planners. It provides a trove of information about the issues that have fueled debate about the census process and about the operations and quality of the nation’s twenty-second decennial enumeration.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!