Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 46


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 45
Colloquium Ingestion of bacterially expressed clouble-stranclecl RNA inhibits gene expression in planarians Phillip A. Newmark*t, Peter W. Reddient, Francesc Cebria*, and Alejandro Sanchez Alvaradot *Department of Cell and Structural Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, B107 Chemical Life Sciences Laboratory, 601 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801; and "Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Utah School of Medicine, 401 Medical Research and Education Building, 20 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 Freshwater planarian flatworms are capable of regenerating com- plete organisms from tiny fragments of their boLlies; the basis for this regenerative prowess is an experimentally accessible stem cell population that is present in the adult planarian. The study of these organisms, classic experimental models for investigating metazoan regeneration, has been revitalized by the application of modern molecular biological approaches. The identification of thousands of unique planarian ESTs, coupled with large-scale whole-mount in situ hybridization screens, and the ability to inhibit planarian gene expression through double-stranded RNA-mediated genetic inter- ference, provide a wealth of tools for studying the molecular mechanisms that regulate tissue regeneration and stem cell biol- ogy in these organisms. Here we show that, as in Caenorhabditis elegant, ingestion of bacterially expressed double-stranded RNA can inhibit gene expression in planarians. This inhibition persists throughout the process of regeneration, allowing phenotypes with disrupted regenerative patterning to be identified. These results pave the way for large-scale screens for genes involved in regenerative processes. As young students, most of us learn about the amazing abilities of certain animals (e.g., urodele amphibians) to regenerate missing body parts. Despite the obvious biomedical ramifications of understanding how such organisms are capable of replacing lost parts, we remain largely in the dark about the mechanisms involved (1~. One of the classic models for studying animal regeneration, the freshwater planarian (2), has become the focus of recent efforts to investigate the mechanisms under- lying regenerative processes. The introduction of the powerful techniques of molecular biology has reinvigorated interest in these fascinating organisms and provided new tools for studying this fundamental problem of developmental biology (3, 44. X-irradiation and elegant transplantation experiments showed that stem cells, referred to as neoblasts, serve as the source of new tissue during planarian regeneration (2, 5~. These stem cells can be specifically labeled and followed through the process of regeneration and differentiation (64. To initiate the molecular analysis of regeneration and stem cell regulation in planarians, a collection of ~3,000 unique ESTs has been generated from a clonal line of the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea (7~. Whole- mount in situ hybridization techniques in planarians (8) have been adapted to allow large-scale screens for gene expression patterns in the whole organism, providing markers for nearly all of the differentiated cell types (74. Most importantly, double- stranded RNA (dsRNA)-mediated genetic interference (RNAi) (9) can be used to inhibit specifically gene expression in planar- ians (10), allowing gene function to be dissected in these animals (11-13~. For example, RNAi knockdowns of the gene nou- dc~rake, which encodes a fibroblast growth factor receptor- related protein, result in ectopic brain formation throughout the planarian (13), providing an initial glimpse into the mechanisms www.pnas.org/cgi/cloi/ ~ 0. ~ 073/pnas. ~ 834205 ~ 00 underlying inhibitory signals first suggested by transplantation experiments (24. With the availability of thousands of planarian ESTs, and the potential for using RNAi to identify genes involved in regener- ative processes, we sought to develop a method for delivering dsRNA that would facilitate large-scale screening efforts. Large- scale RNAi-based screens in Cacuorhabditis elegans have been expedited by a method devised by Timmons and Fire (14) for using Escherichia cold to express and deliver dsRNA to the nematode via feeding (154. This approach has been used to screen for phenotypes resulting from the inhibition of all ORFs encoded on C. elegans chromosome I (16) and for more recent genomewide screens (17, 184. Here we show that ingestion of bacteria that express dsRNA triggers the planarian RNAi re- sponse, leading to specific gene inhibition. This inhibition is long lasting, enabling gene expression to be inhibited throughout the process of regeneration. After amputation of animals fed ap- propriate targeting constructs, defects in the regenerative pro- cess can be observed with specific molecular markers. These results indicate that large-scale RNAi screens are possible in planarians; such screens will facilitate a systematic dissection of the mechanisms that regulate regeneration in these organisms. Materials and Methods Planarian Culture. A clonal, asexual strain (7) of S. mediterranea (19) was used for the experiments and maintained as described (64. Delivery of dsRbIA Via Bacterial Feeding. Restriction fragments (~400-700 bp) from the targeted cDNAs (central marker B2, GenBank accession no. AY068367; central marker B10, Gen- Bank accession no. AY068369; gut marker D14, GenBank accession no. AY066311; photoreceptor marker E30, GenBank accession no. AY066982 j were ligated into the double T7 vector pL4440 double T7 script II (15) and transfected into competent DH1OB cells. A Gateway (Invitrogen)-compatible L4440 vector was constructed by ligating Gateway Cassette C into SmaI- digested L4440. Clone H.108.3a (GenBank accession no. AY067513) was cloned into the resulting L4440 Gateway vector by PCR amplification and cloning into pDONR221 (Invitrogen), and subsequent transfer by using an LR cloning reaction into L4440 Gateway. The L4440 unc-22 plasmid, pLT61, was pro- vided by Andy Fire (Carnegie Institution of Washington, Balti- more). The resulting recombinant plasmids were introduced into competent (20) HT115(DE3) cells that lack RNase III and can This paper results from the Arthur M. Sackler Colloquium of the National Acaclemy of Sciences, "Regenerative Meclicine," held October 18-22, 2002, at the Arnold ancl Mabel Beckman Center of the National Acaclemies of Science ancl Engineering in Irvine, CA. Abbreviations: cisRNA, double-strancled RNA; RNAi, RNA-mediated genetic interference; MP, metalloproteinase. iTo whom corresponclence should be acidresseci. E-mail: pnewmark@life.uluc.edu. 2003 by The National Acaclemy of Sciences of the USA PNAS 1 September 30, 2003 1 vol. 100 1 suppl. 1 1 11861-11865

OCR for page 45
E cold ~cDNA (~T7~17 USA N A artificial nl~narian food / pharynx E. cold liver, agarose, food coloring Fig. 1. Method for feeding bacteria expressing dsRNA to planarians. dsRNA synthesis is induced in E. cold by using a vector developed for use in C. elegans (15) that contains two T7 RNA polymerase promoters flanking the cDNA sequence of interest. After induction of dsRNA synthesis, bacteria are mixed with homogenized liver (normal planarian food), ultra-low gelling temperature agarose, and red food coloring (for visualization of eating). This mixture solidifies, and animals that ingest this artificial food become red and are exposed to the dsRNA. be induced to express T7 polymerase in the presence of isopropyl f-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) (14, 154. For the experiments shown in Fig. 2, 2-ml cultures in LB/carbenicillin were started with a 1:10 dilution of an overnight culture (grown in LB/carbenicillin plus tetracycline) and incubated for 90 min at 37C with shaking. The cultures were induced with 0.4 mM IPTG and incubated for an additional 4 h at 37C. For the experiments using the H.108.3a construct, 4-ml cultures were induced with 1 mM IPTG for 2 h at 37C. The cultures were then centrifuged and resuspended in 50-100 Al of an artificial food mix consisting of liver homoge- nate, ultra-low gelling agarose, and food coloring (6~. Planarians commenced eating almost immediately on exposure to the food and finished eating within 15-30 min. Preliminary experiments suggested that the most consistent inhibition was observed after three feedings of the L4440 constructs. After the initial feeding, the vast majority of planarians would not eat the artificial food mixture on a daily feeding regimen. Thus, feedings were re- peated every other day for a total of three times; in the case of H.108.3a, feedings were repeated every third day. In situ hybrid- ization was used as described below to monitor reduction in transcript levels after ingestion of bacterially expressed dsRNA, in both intact and regenerating animals. Microinjection of dsRNA. dsRNA was prepared from H.108.3a by using the MegaScript in vitro transcription system (Ambion, Austin, TX). Intact planarians were injected three times with 32 nl dsRNA (or H2O for negative controls) by using a Drummond Nanoject II microinjector (Broomall, PA) (104. Injections were repeated for 3 consecutive days, and the worms were amputated, allowed to regenerate, and then fixed and processed for immu- nofluorescence as described below. Whole-Mount in Situ Hybridization and Immunofluorescence. To detect differences in transcript levels after dsRNA feeding, intact and regenerating planarians were fixed and processed for whole-mount in situ hybridization as described (7~. To monitor photoreceptor axonal projections, planarians were fixed and processed for whole-mount immunostaining as described (10~. mAb VC-1 (21), a generous gift of Kiyokazu Agata (RIKEN, Kobe, Japan), was used (1:5,000-1:10,000 dilution) to label the photoreceptor axons; goat anti-mouse Alexa 488 (Molecular Probes) was used at 1:400. Results Bacterially Expressed dsRNA Inhibits Gene Expression in Planarians. Genomewide RNAi-based screens have been conducted in C. elegans by feeding nematodes E. cold that express dsRNA (17, 11862 1 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1834205100 18). To test the feasibility of using this methodology to inhibit gene expression in planarians, we designed constructs to target several abundantly expressed, cell type-specific genes: two centrally expressed metalloproteinases (MPs), B2 (a collage- nase III-like MP) and B10 (an astacin-like MP); a digestive system marker (D14.38~; and a photoreceptor-specific arrestin (E30) (7~. Unlike C. elegans, planarians do not normally ingest bacteria. Therefore, we resuspended dsRNA-expressing E. cold cells in a planarian artificial food mixture containing homog- enized liver, ultra-low gelling temperature agarose, and food coloring (Fig. 14. This artificial food was then fed to the planarians three times over the course of 5 days (see Materials and Methods). Planarians that ingested the bacteria/food mixture were viable, and we observed no perturbation of the regenerative process after feeding of a control bacterial strain containing the vector alone. However, when the bacteria expressing specific dsRNAs were fed to the flatworms, we observed inhibition of the targeted genes (Fig. 2~. The inhi- bition was quite specific: targeting of one centrally expressed MP did not affect transcript levels of the other centrally expressed MP (Fig. 2a), nor were effects observed on gene expression in other cell types, like the gut or photoreceptors. Similar specificity was observed when gut-specific or photo- receptor-specific genes were targeted (Fig. 2 b and c). Thus, the observed inhibition is not caused by a general reduction in transcript levels, but is specific to the targeted RNA. Inhibition of gene expression could be observed as early as 1-2 days after the third feeding, and the effects were relatively long lasting, with reduced levels still observed in intact animals 24 days postfeeding (data not shown). Complete regeneration takes between 1 and 2 weeks in this species, depending on the site of amputation. To test whether the inhibitory effect of the ingested bacterially expressed dsRNA would perdure throughout the regenerative process, we amputated planarians after their third feeding, allowed them to regenerate, and then processed them for whole-mount in situ hybridization. As illustrated in Fig. 2d, inhibition of expression of the astacin-like MP B10 persists after amputation and regeneration of new tissue. Similar results were obtained after targeting the other centrally expressed MP (B2) or genes expressed in other cell types (sensory neurons, gastro- dermal cells), demonstrating the feasibility of using this method to inhibit genes expressed in many cell types throughout the process of regeneration. RNAi by Feeding or Injection Can Produce Similar Phenotypes. Be- cause RNAi has been applied only recently to studies of pla- narian biology, only five RNAi-induced phenotypes have been Newmark et a/.

OCR for page 45
Fig. 2. Inhibition of gene expression in planarians by ingestion of bacterially expressed dsRNA. (a) Specific inhibition of a centrally expressed MP. Both animals were fed bacteria expressing a construct targeting an astacin-like MP (B10). One animal (Upper) was hybridized to detect the transcript encoded by another centrally expressed MP (collagenase-like B2; positive signal in 10/10), whereas another animal (Lower) was hybridized to detect B10 (no detectable expression in 32/36; significantly reduced expression in 3/36). When MP B2 was targeted, and animals were fixed and hybridized to detect B2 transcripts, no signal was detected in 39/47 samples; 8/47 showed a strong reduction of transcript (data not shown). (b) Inhibition of photoreceptor expression of arrestin E30. (Upper) The animals were fed bacteria targeting a gut-specific gene; photoreceptor expression of E30 is normal (7/7). (Lower) The animals were fed a construct targeting photoreceptor-specific arrestin (reduction observed in 17/17). (c) Inhibition of expression in the gastrovascular system. Hybridization with gastrovascular-specific probe D14.38. (Upper) The animal was fed a construct targeting a photo-receptor-specific gene (4/4 positive). (Lower) The animal was fed a construct targeting D 14.38 (no signal i n 44/44 worms). (d) Inhibition persists throughout the regenerative process. (Upper) The anima Is were fed a control bacterial stra in, containing the vector alone. (Lower) The animals were fed bacteria targeting astacin-like MP B 10. Three days after feed ing, planarians were cut into three parts and allowed to regenerate for 9 days [12 days afterthe last feeding; animals are regenerated from head fragments (Left), trunk fragments (Center), and tail fragments (Right)]. The control worms reestablished expression of B10 (positive signal in 6/6 treated worms), whereas in the experimentalworms B10 expression was inhibited below detectable levels (no detectable expression in 14/14 worms). reported to date, and all of these have used microinjection to deliver the dsRNA (10-134. To address the question of whether ingestion of bacterially expressed dsRNA could also produce phenotypes comparable to those observed after microinjection of dsRNAs, we tested the efficacy of RNAi for inhibiting a planarian gene (H.108.3a) (7) that is predicted to play a role in axon guidance based on its similarity to the netrin receptor encoded by frazzled (22~. Whole-mount in situ hybridization analysis of numerous CNS-specific genes in the planarian Dug- esia japonica showed that a planarian netrin gene is expressed in the brain in the presumptive visual center to which the photo- receptor axons project (23~. The planarian photoreceptors send axonal projections across the midline to the visual center of the brain; these cells can be visualized with mAb VC-1 (Fig. 3 a and e) (21~. Given the role of netrin in axonal guidance in other organisms (24-29), it is reasonable to predict that it plays a similar role in guiding the photoreceptor axons to their proper targets in the planarian brain. Planarians injected with H.108.3a dsRNA were amputated and allowed to regenerate; in all cases, these animals regen- erated photoreceptor axons that did not target the brain appropriately (Fig. 3 b-d). A range of phenotypes was ob- served: in approximately one-third of the fragments, the Newmark et a/. photoreceptor axons appeared to approach or cross the mid- line but did not extend posteriorly toward the visual center (Fig. 3b); in another one-third, ectopic anterior projections were observed, usually running along the midline (Fig. 3c J; in the remaining samples, the axonal projections were highly disorganized, with numerous ectopic projections (Fig. 3d). These results clearly implicate H. 108.3a in photoreceptor axonal targeting in planarians. The dramatic phenotypes observed after injection of H.108.3a dsRNA provide a useful measure by which to compare the effects of dsRNA injections and feeding. Planarians were fed bacterially expressed H.108.3a dsRNA; they were then ampu- tated and allowed to regenerate. In two-thirds of the samples, the regenerated photoreceptor axons were misrouted: the pheno- typic classes produced after RNAi by feeding were strikingly similar to those produced after RNAi by injection. Regenerated photoreceptor neurons failed to send projections posteriorly from the optic chiasmata (Fig. 3f), had abnormal optic chias- mata (Fig. 3g), or had additional projections and patterning defects (Fig. 3h). None of these phenotypes was observed in animals fed bacteria expressing control dsRNA from the C. elegans unc-22 gene, a negative control for bacteria expressing dsRNA not expected to affect any S. mediterranea gene (Fig. 3e). PNAS 1 September30, 2003 1 vol. 100 1 suppl. 1 1 11863

OCR for page 45
Thus, delivery of dsRNA by feeding is capable of generating phenotypes comparable to those observed after microinjection of dsRNA, albeit with lower penetrance. it_ ._ ._ Fig. 3. Introduction of H.108.3a dsRNA by injection (a-d) or feeding (e-h) results in similar defects in axonal guidance after regeneration. (a) Control injections; 16/18 regenerated animals display normal axonal trajectories; 2/18 show minor defects distinct from those shown below. (b-d) Phenotypes observed after injection of H.108.3a dsRNA. (b) Regenerated photoreceptor neurons failed to extend axons posteriorly from the optic chiasmata toward the visual center of the brain (8/28 animals). (c) Regenerated photoreceptor neurons had abnormal anterior projections from the optic chiasmata (1 1/28 animals). (d) Regenerated photoreceptors had ectopic projections or pattern- ing defects (9/28 animals). (e) Control RNAi by feeding; animals were fed bacteria expressing dsRNA from the C. elegans unc-22 gene. After amputation and regeneration, 0/40 animals displayed any abnormalities in axon path- finding. (f-h) Phenotypes observed after feeding of bacterially expressed H.108.3a dsRNA. (fl Regenerated photoreceptor neurons failed to extend axons posteriorly from the optic chiasmata (18/48 animals). (g) Regenerated photoreceptors had abnormal anterior projections from the optic chiasmata (10/48 animals). (h) Regenerated photoreceptors had ectopic projections or patterning defects (4/48). The remainder (16/48) had no observable defects in the pattern of axonal projections (data not shown). oc, optic chiasmata. Arrowheads, posterior axon projections from optic chiasmata to brain. The view is anteriortothetop in all frames. (Scale bars: a-d, 100,um; e-in, 125 ,um.) 1. Sanchez Alvarado, A. (2000) BioEssays 22, 578-590. ~ _ 2. Br0ndsted, H. V. (1969) Planarian Regeneration (Pergamon, London). 5049-5054. 3. A~?~ta K ~ Watanahe K. (19991 .Semin. Cell Dev. 13~1. 10. 377-~3 4. ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ 7 Newmark, P. A. & Sanchez Alvarado, A. (2002) Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 210-219. 5. Baguna, J., Salo, E. & Auladell, C. (1989) Development (Cambridge, U.K) 107, 77-86. 6. Newmark, P. & Sanchez Alvarado, A. (2000) Dev. Biol. 220, 142-153. 7. Sanchez Alvarado, A., Newmark, P. A., Robb, S. & Juste, R. (2002) Develop- ment (Cambridge, U.K) 129, 5659-5665. 8. Umesono, Y., Watanabe, K. & Agata, K. (1997) Dev. Growth Differ. 39, 723-727. 9. Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E. & Mello, C. C. ~ ~ ^ (1998) Nature 391, 806-811. 11864 1 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1834205100 Discussion The above results demonstrate that feeding bacterially expressed dsRNA is an effective method for reducing gene expression in planarians. This method is specific, affecting only the gene targeted for disruption, and can be used to target genes ex- pressed in a variety of cell types, including secretory cells, cells of the gastrovascular system, and neurons. The sensitivity of planarian neurons to microinjected dsRNA has already been demonstrated for sensory neurons (10, 11) and cells of the CNS (13~. This sensitivity to dsRNA is in marked contrast to C. elegans, in which mature neurons are largely refractory to RNAi, independent of whether the dsRNA is delivered via injection, feeding, or soaking (15~. The inhibitory effect of ingested dsRNA in planarians is relatively long lasting, with inhibition observed over a period of several weeks (up to at least 24 days; we have not yet tested later time points) after feeding. This result is consistent with the 3-week inhibition reported after dsRNA injection in the planarian Girardia tigrina (114. Crit- ically, when planarians that have ingested bacterially expressed dsRNA are amputated and allowed to regenerate, target gene expression in numerous different cell types remains reduced throughout the process of regeneration. As we show by targeting a putative netrin receptor homologue, this inhibition can yield spe- cific regeneration-defective phenotypes similar to those observed after injection of dsRNA. The lower penetrance with which these phenotypes are observed likely reflects the need for further opti- mization of the feeding protocol. The results reported here establish RNAi by bacterial feeding as a method for inhibiting gene function in planarians. This feeding methodology will allow much larger RNAi screens to be conducted in planarians than would have been possible by using the more technically demanding and time-consuming microin- jection. When combined with molecular markers to visualize specific cell types (7), such large-scale RNAi-based screens will expedite discovery of genes required for the formation and patterning of planarian cells, tissues, and organs and will facil- itate dissection of the molecular basis of regeneration in these fascinating organisms. We thank Lisa Timmons and Andy Fire for sharing the bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work, many helpful discussions, and once again making it respectable to feed worms with RNA; Kiyokazu Agata for providing the VC-1 mAb; Sumita Saha for help with the initial feeding experiments; and our colleagues at the Carnegie Institution of Wash- ington's Department of Embryology for their support. This work has been supported by National Institutes of Health Grants RO-1 GM57260 (to A.S.A) and RO-1 HD043403 (to P.A.N.) and National Research Service Award F32-GM19539 ito P.A.N.~. P.W.R. is a fellow of the Helen Hay Whitney Foundation; F.C. is a Visiting Fulbright Scholar of the Generalitat of Catalunya; and P.A.N. is a Damon Runyon Scholar supported by the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (Grant DRS 33-03~. lO Sanchez Alvarado. A. & Newmark, P. A. (19991 Proc. Natl. A cad. .\c'. U~?A 96. 11. Pineda, D., Gonzalez, J., Callaerts, P., Ikeo, K., Gehring, W. J. & Salo, E. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4525-4529. 12. Bueno, D., Fernandez-Rodriguez, J., Cardona, A., Hernandez-Hernandez, V. & Romero, R. (2002) Dev. Biol. 252, 188-201. 13. Cebria, F., Kobayashi, C., Umesono, Y., Nakazawa, M., Mineta, K., Ikeo, K., Gojobori, T., Itoh, M., Taira, M., Sanchez Alvarado, A. & Agata, K. (2002) Nature 419, 620-624. 14. Timmons, L. & Fire, A. (1998) Nature 395, 854. 15. Timmons, L., Court, D. L. & Fire, A. (2001) Ge~e 263, 103-112. 16. Fraser, A. G., Kamath, R. S., Zipperlen, P., Martinez-Campos, M., Sohrmann, , . . . . . M. & Ahringer, J. (2000) Nature 408, 325-330. 17. Kamath, R. S., Fraser, A. G., Dong, Y., Poulin, G., Durbin, R., Gotta, M., Newmark et al.

OCR for page 45
Kanapin, A., Le Bot, N., Moreno, S., Sohrmann, M., et al. (2003) Nature 421, 231-237. 18. Ashrafi, K., Chang, F. Y., Watts, J. L., Fraser, A. G., Kamath, R. S., Ahringer, J. & Ruvkun, G. (2003) Nature 421, 268-272. 19. Benazzi, M., 13allester, R., Bagur~a, J. & Puccinelli, I. (1972) Caryologia 25, 59-68. 20. Chung, C. T., Niemela, S. L. & Miller, R. H. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 2172-2175. 21. Agata, K., Soejima, Y., Kato, K., Kobayashi, C., Umesono, Y. & Watanabe, K. (1998) Zool. Sci. 15, 433-440. 22. Kolodziej, P. A., Timpe, L. C., Mitchell, K. J., Fried, S. R., Goodman, C. S., Jan, L. Y. & Jan, Y. N. (1996) Cc~ll 87, 197-204. Newmark et al. 23. Cebria, F., Nakazawa, M., Mineta, K., Ikeo, K., Gojobori, T. & Agata, K. (2002) Dev. Growth Differ. 44, 135-146. 24. Kennedy, T. E., Serafini, T., de la Torre, J. R. & Tessier-Lavigne, M. (1994) Cell 78, 425-435. 25. Serafini, T., Kennedy, T. E., Galko, M. J., Mirzayan, C., Jessell, T. M. & Tessier-Lavigne, M. (1994) Cell 78, 409-424. 26. Harris, R., Sabatelli, L. M. & Seeger, M. A. (1996) Neuron 17, 217-228. 27. Mitchell, K. J., Doyle, J. L., Serafini, T., Kennedy, T. E., Tessier-Lavigne, M., Goodman, C. S. & Dickson, B. J. (1996) Ner~ro~z 17, 203-215. 28. de la Torre, J. R., Hopker, V. H., Ming, G. L., Poo, M. M., Tessier-Lavigne, M., Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. & Holt, C. E. (1997) Neuron 19, 1211-1224. 29. Wadsworth, W. G. (2002) Trends Ne~,osci. 25, 423-429. PNAS 1 September 30, 2003 1 vol. 100 1 suppl. 1 1 11865