National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$59.95
add to cart

HARDBACK
price:$79.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate (2005)
Food and Nutrition Board (FNB)

Citation Manager

. "3 A Model for the Development of Tolerable Upper Intake Levels." Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
66
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate

tween intake and the extent of the toxic response known to be most relevant to humans. Data on bioavailability are considered and adjustments in expressions of dose-response are made to determine whether any apparent differences in response can be explained.

  • The critical data set documents the route of exposure and the magnitude and duration of the intake. Furthermore, the critical data set documents the NOAEL (or LOAEL).

Identification of NOAEL (or LOAEL)

A nutrient can produce more than one toxic effect (or endpoint), even within the same species or in studies using the same or different exposure durations. The NOAELs and LOAELs for these effects will ordinarily differ. The critical endpoint used to establish a UL is the adverse biological effect exhibiting the lowest NOAEL (e.g., the most sensitive indicator of a nutrient’s toxicity). Because the selection of uncertainty factors (UFs) depends in part on the seriousness of the adverse effect, it is possible that lower ULs may result from the use of the most serious (rather than most sensitive) endpoint. Thus, it is often necessary to evaluate several endpoints independently to determine which one leads to the lowest UL.

For some nutrients, there may be inadequate data on which to develop a UL. The lack of reports of adverse effects following excess intake of a nutrient does not mean that adverse effects do not occur. As the intake of any nutrient increases, a point (see Figure 3-2) is reached at which intake begins to pose a risk. Above this point, increased intake increases the risk of adverse effects. For some nutrients and for various reasons, there are inadequate data to identify this point or even to estimate its location.

Because adverse effects are almost certain to occur for any nutrient at some level of intake, it should be assumed that such effects may occur for nutrients for which a scientifically documentable UL cannot now be derived. Until a UL is set or an alternative approach to identifying protective limits is developed, intakes greater than the Recommended Dietary Allowance or Adequate Intake should be viewed with caution.

The absence of sufficient data to establish a UL points to the need for studies suitable for developing them.

Uncertainty Assessment

Several judgments must be made regarding the uncertainties and thus the uncertainty factor (UF) associated with extrapolating from

Page
66
Front Matter (R1-R20)
Summary (1-20)
1 Introduction to Dietary Reference Intakes (21-36)
2 Overview and Methods (37-49)
3 A Model for the Development of Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (50-72)
4 Water (73-185)
5 Potassium (186-268)
6 Sodium and Chloride (269-423)
7 Sulfate (424-448)
8 Applications of Dietary Reference Intakes for Electrolytes and Water (449-464)
9 A Research Agenda (465-470)
Appendix A: Glossary and Acronyms (471-476)
Appendix B: Origin and Framework of the Development of Dietary Reference Intakes (477-484)
Appendix C: Predictions of Daily Water and Sodium Requirements (485-493)
Appendix D: U.S. Dietary Intake Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994 (494-517)
Appendix E: U.S. Dietary Intake Data for Water and Weaning Foods from the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals, 1994–1996, 1998 (518-526)
Appendix F: Canadian Dietary Intake Data for Adults from Ten Provinces, 1990–1997 (527-533)
Appendix G: U.S. Water Intake and Serum Osmolality Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994 (534-536)
Appendix H: U.S. Total Water Intake Data by Frequency of Leisure Time Activity from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994 (537-545)
Appendix I: Dose-Response Effects of Sodium Intake on Blood Pressure (546-557)
Appendix J: Serum Electrolyte Concentrations NHANES III, 1988-94 (558-563)
Appendix K: Options for Dealing with Uncertainties (564-568)
Appendix L: Acknowledgments (569-571)
Appendix M: Biographical Sketches of Panel Members (572-576)
Index (577-618)