National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$45.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Terrorism: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Improving Responses: U.S - Russian Workshop Proceedings (2004)

Citation Manager

. "The Department of Homeland Security: Background and Challenges." Terrorism: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Improving Responses: U.S - Russian Workshop Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
177
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Terrorism: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Improving Responses - U.S.-Russian Workshop Proceedings

free trade, and the expansion of democratic regimes provided a relatively unregulated environment for terrorist and criminal groups worldwide.

The result was a series of U.S. commissions in the late 1990s that looked at differing aspects of U.S. national security, including the threat of weapons of mass destruction and terrorism—the Hart-Rudman Commission, the Gilmore Commission, and the National Commission on Terrorism. At the same time, individual members of Congress had expressed concern that the United States did not have a cohesive, threat-driven, counterterrorism strategy. Some in Congress also expressed concern over the difficulty of ascertaining how much money was allocated to combat terrorism and where it was going.

Many proposals for reform were announced, most recommending more centralized policy direction. Some favored keeping and strengthening existing institutions. Others proposed establishing a coordinating office within the office of the vice-president, and yet others sought to merge a few federal agencies into a larger one. Reform was debated, but before the attacks of September 11, 2001, counterterrorism was simply not the top priority of the U.S. law enforcement and intelligence communities.

After September 11, 2001, priorities changed rapidly and dramatically. There was strong pressure for Congress and the administration to act decisively, and there was strong pressure from the intelligence community to focus any dramatic organizational mergers and reassignment of responsibilities away from them. Shortly thereafter (October 2001), President Bush, arguably in an attempt to preempt action from Congress, created an Office of Homeland Security designed to coordinate domestic terrorism efforts. Some members of Congress and some experts in the field, however, recommended a new federal agency or full department to integrate and heighten antiterrorism efforts. In 2002 the Bush administration sponsored its own proposal along these lines, and on November 19, 2002, Congress passed the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (P.L. 107-296). The president named Tom Ridge, former director of the Office of Homeland Security, to be secretary of the new Department of Homeland Security created by the act. The Senate confirmed Ridge’s nomination.

The creation of the new department constitutes the most substantial reorganization of the federal government agencies since the National Security Act of 1947, which placed the different military departments under a secretary of defense and created the National Security Council (NSC) and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

When we look at the emerging Department of Homeland Security, we see that it incorporates 22 government agencies and some 179,000 people into a single organization. We also see an organization with

  • a proposed budget for FY 2004 of $36.2 billion—roughly one-tenth the size of the nation’s military defense budget ($380 billion). Note that overall these amounts constitute roughly a 7 percent jump in domestic defense spending.

Page
177
Front Matter (R1-R14)
URBAN TERRORISM Analysis of the Threats and Consequences of Terrorist Acts in Urban Settings: Outline of a Protection System (1-14)
Urban Security and September 11, 2001, in New York City: Projection of Threats onto a City as a Target and Measures to Avert Them or Minimize Their Impact (15-25)
Lessons Learned from the Nord-Ost Terrorist Attack in Moscow from the Standpoint of Russian Security and Law Enforcement Agencies (26-34)
Preventing Catastrophic Consequences of Bioterrorism in an Urban Setting (35-38)
Toxic Chemicals and Explosive Materials: Terrorism-Related Issues for the Research Community, Chemical Industry, and Government (39-46)
The Role of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs in Combating Terrorism in Urban Conditions (47-57)
The Three R’s: Lessons Learned from September 11, 2001 (58-68)
The Role of the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations and Executive Branch Agencies of the City of Moscow in Dealing with Emergency Situations Arising from Acts of Terrorism (69-74)
CYBERTERRORISM A Perspective on Cybersecurity Research in the United States (75-84)
Analysis of the Threat of Cyberattacks to Major Transportation Control Systems in Russia (85-92)
Cyberattacks as an Amplifier in Terrorist Strategy (93-96)
Cybercrime and Cyberterrorism (97-103)
Protecting Bank Networks from Acts of Computer Terrorism (104-111)
Computer Security Training for Professional Specialists and Other Personnel Associated with Preventing and Responding to Computer Attacks (112-120)
Information Assurance Education in the United States (121-124)
Technical Protection of Electronic Documents in Computer Systems (125-135)
Certain Aspects Regarding the Development of Conditions Favorable to Cyberterrorism and the Main Areas of Cooperation in the Struggle Against It (136-142)
PAPERS PRESENTED TO THE NRC AND RAS COMMITTEES Problems of Combating Terrorism and Possible Areas for Russian-American Scientific Cooperation to Resolve Them (143-148)
Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism—A Report of the U.S. National Academies (149-159)
International Aspects of Creating a State System for Countering Illegal Circulation of Radioactive Materials in the Russian Federation (160-163)
Medical Aspects of Combating Acts of Bioterrorism (164-167)
Roots of Terrorism (168-175)
The Department of Homeland Security: Background and Challenges (176-184)
A Agendas for the Workshops on Urban and Cyberterrorism and the Meeting of the RAS and NRC Committees, March 2003 (185-193)
B Annex 2 to the Agreement of Cooperation in Science, Engineering, and Medicine Between the Russian Academy of Sciences and the U.S. National Academies: Russian-American Cooperation in Counterterrorism (194-195)
C Comprehensive Training of Specialists to Counter Information Security Threats (196-205)
D Excerpts from “Bioterrorism: A National and Global Threat” (206-213)
E Biological Terrorism (214-221)
F Top-Priority Problems for Scientific Research on the Information Security of the Russian Federation (222-228)
G Proposal for a Chem-Bio Attack Response Center (CBARC) for Chicago, Illinois, U.S., 2003 (229-240)