National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$45.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Terrorism: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Improving Responses: U.S - Russian Workshop Proceedings (2004)

Citation Manager

. "Preventing Catastrophic Consequences of Bioterrorism in an Urban Setting." Terrorism: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Improving Responses: U.S - Russian Workshop Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
36
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Terrorism: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Improving Responses - U.S.-Russian Workshop Proceedings

The most vulnerable points in a large city include the subway system, shopping centers, stadiums, mass gatherings at holidays and festivals, and grocery stores. Terrorist acts could lead to massive casualties because the use of a bioagent could go unnoticed during its entire latency period (usually 7–14 days).

Example 1: Just 1 g of anthrax spores represents 10 million lethal doses. Unless antibiotics are administered before the first symptoms appear, the mortality rate from anthrax could reach 85–90 percent. The simultaneous release of anthrax in several subway stations (perhaps by throwing a packet of spores in the path of a train arriving in the station), further dispersed with the aid of air currents produced by the movement of the trains, could under conditions existing in Moscow lead to the infection of several million people. Furthermore, taking into account the flow of passengers through Moscow to other regions, infected individuals would simultaneously appear at the end of the latency period in almost all regions of Russia. The result would be a general catastrophe, panic, and great difficulty in determining the source of the infection. Given current capabilities for detecting pathogens in air samples, such a scenario is completely possible.

Example 2: Anthrax spores could be dispersed using flares or fireworks set off during crowded holiday events (at stadiums, on New Year’s Eve, at public festivals, and so forth). Such fireworks could also be set off on the roofs of tall buildings with the help of remote-control devices. To prevent such occurrences, the use of low-temperature explosive devices (fireworks and flares) by private individuals could be banned, and much tighter controls on the organization of large public events could be instituted.

Example 3: Let us reconsider the situation involving the use of anthrax spores, as this bioagent is the most accessible to potential terrorists and does not require complex technologies for acquisition and use. In this case, the scenario would involve the use of pilotless aircraft. The simplest would be helium-filled balloons, which are common at all public festivals. A floating balloon with a toy dangling from it would not attract anyone’s suspicions; meanwhile, this “toy” could be a container dispersing spores. Taking into account wind direction, such a delivery device could infect tens of thousands of people (at stadiums, squares, festivals, amusement parks, and so forth), and the individual committing this terrorist act would face no risk in doing so.

Even these very simple examples demonstrate how vulnerable the modern city is. It is clear that even if the source and transmission path of the infection are discovered, decontamination measures (cleaning of the subway or parts of the city) could paralyze the operation of the city’s infrastructure for a long time.

In addition to the creation of possible attack scenarios, systems for the early detection of the most likely dangerous bioagents will become a very important element in the system for countering bioterrorism. Critical characteristics of such systems include sensitivity, processing time, and reliability (absence of false positive signals), as well as the number of agents that can be identified. The need for widespread utilization of such devices requires that they must be capable of

Page
36
Front Matter (R1-R14)
URBAN TERRORISM Analysis of the Threats and Consequences of Terrorist Acts in Urban Settings: Outline of a Protection System (1-14)
Urban Security and September 11, 2001, in New York City: Projection of Threats onto a City as a Target and Measures to Avert Them or Minimize Their Impact (15-25)
Lessons Learned from the Nord-Ost Terrorist Attack in Moscow from the Standpoint of Russian Security and Law Enforcement Agencies (26-34)
Preventing Catastrophic Consequences of Bioterrorism in an Urban Setting (35-38)
Toxic Chemicals and Explosive Materials: Terrorism-Related Issues for the Research Community, Chemical Industry, and Government (39-46)
The Role of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs in Combating Terrorism in Urban Conditions (47-57)
The Three R’s: Lessons Learned from September 11, 2001 (58-68)
The Role of the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations and Executive Branch Agencies of the City of Moscow in Dealing with Emergency Situations Arising from Acts of Terrorism (69-74)
CYBERTERRORISM A Perspective on Cybersecurity Research in the United States (75-84)
Analysis of the Threat of Cyberattacks to Major Transportation Control Systems in Russia (85-92)
Cyberattacks as an Amplifier in Terrorist Strategy (93-96)
Cybercrime and Cyberterrorism (97-103)
Protecting Bank Networks from Acts of Computer Terrorism (104-111)
Computer Security Training for Professional Specialists and Other Personnel Associated with Preventing and Responding to Computer Attacks (112-120)
Information Assurance Education in the United States (121-124)
Technical Protection of Electronic Documents in Computer Systems (125-135)
Certain Aspects Regarding the Development of Conditions Favorable to Cyberterrorism and the Main Areas of Cooperation in the Struggle Against It (136-142)
PAPERS PRESENTED TO THE NRC AND RAS COMMITTEES Problems of Combating Terrorism and Possible Areas for Russian-American Scientific Cooperation to Resolve Them (143-148)
Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism—A Report of the U.S. National Academies (149-159)
International Aspects of Creating a State System for Countering Illegal Circulation of Radioactive Materials in the Russian Federation (160-163)
Medical Aspects of Combating Acts of Bioterrorism (164-167)
Roots of Terrorism (168-175)
The Department of Homeland Security: Background and Challenges (176-184)
A Agendas for the Workshops on Urban and Cyberterrorism and the Meeting of the RAS and NRC Committees, March 2003 (185-193)
B Annex 2 to the Agreement of Cooperation in Science, Engineering, and Medicine Between the Russian Academy of Sciences and the U.S. National Academies: Russian-American Cooperation in Counterterrorism (194-195)
C Comprehensive Training of Specialists to Counter Information Security Threats (196-205)
D Excerpts from “Bioterrorism: A National and Global Threat” (206-213)
E Biological Terrorism (214-221)
F Top-Priority Problems for Scientific Research on the Information Security of the Russian Federation (222-228)
G Proposal for a Chem-Bio Attack Response Center (CBARC) for Chicago, Illinois, U.S., 2003 (229-240)