National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 6 Epilogue
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×

References

Anderson, J. L., R. W. Hilborn, R. T. Lackey, and D. Ludwig. 2003. Watershed restoration: Adaptive decision making in the face of uncertainty. In Wissmar, R. C., and P. A. Bisson (eds.) Strategies for Restoring River Ecosystems: Sources of Variability and Uncertainty in Natural and Managed Systems. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.


Barry, J. M. 1997. Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How it Changed America. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

Blake, N. M. 1980. Land into Water—Water into Land: A History of Water Management in Florida. Tallahassee: University Presses of Florida.

Boesch, D. F., M. J. Josselyn, A. J. Mehta, J. T. Morris, W. K. Nuttle, C. A. Simenstad, and D. J. P. Swift. 1994. Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loss, restoration and management in Louisiana. Journal of Coastal Restoration Special Issue 20: 103.1-103.

Boulding, K. 1981. Basic Evolutionary Model. Evolutionary Economics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Brewer, G. D. 1975. An analyst’s view of the uses and abuses of modeling for decision making. Rand Corporation Paper P-5395.


Carrels, P. 1999. Uphill Against Water: The Great Dakota Water War. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Clarke, J. N., and D. C. McCool. 1996. Staking Out the Terrain. 2nd Edition. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Cyert, R. M., and J. G. March. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.


De Neufville, R. 1990. Applied Systems Analysis: Engineering Planning and Technology Management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

De Neufville, R. 2000. Dynamic strategic planning for technology policy. International Journal of Technology Management 19(3/4/5): 225-245.

De Neufville, R., and A. R. Odoni. 2003. The Forecast is Always Wrong. In De Neufville, R. and A.R. Odoni (eds.) Airport Systems

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×

Planning, Design, and Management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

De Neufviille, R. 2004. Uncertainty Management for Engineering Systems Planning and Design. Faculty Monograph, MIT Engineering Systems Symposium, Cambridge, MA, March 2004.

Deschutes Resources Conservancy Website. 2003. Available online at http://www.deschutesrc.org/index.htm, accessed May 21, 2003.

Dewey, J. 1938. Experience and Education. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Doremus, H. 2001. Adaptive management, the Endangered Species Act, and the institutional challenges of “new age” environmental protection. Washburn Law Journal 41:50-89.


EDF (Environmental Defense Fund). 1995. Restoring Oregon’s Deschutes River: Developing Partnerships and Economic Incentives to Improve Water Quality and Instream Flows. New York, NY: Environmental Defense Fund.

Everett, E. A., Jr., and R. J. Ebert. 1986. Production and Operations Management: Concepts, Models, and Behavior. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.


Ferejohn, J. A. 1974. Pork Barrel Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Ferrell, J. 1996. Soundings. Omaha, NE: United States Army Corps of Engineers.

FWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 2000. Final Missouri River Biological Opinion. Washington DC: United States Fish and Wildlife Service.


GAO (United States General Accounting Office). 2003. South Florida Ecosystem Restoration: Task Force Needs to Improve Science Coordination to Increase the Likelihood for Success. GAO-03-345. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Gunderson, L. 1999. Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management—Antidotes for spurious certitude? Conservation Ecology 3(1):7. Available online at http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art7, February 13, 2003.

Gunderson, L. 2000. Resilience in theory and practice. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:425-439.


Häfele, W., and R. Bürk. 1976. An attempt of log-range macroeconomic modeling in view of structural and technological change. IASA RM-76-32.

Hays, S. P. 1999. Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×

Holling, C. S. (ed.). 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.


Jacobs, J. W. 2002. Broadening U.S. water resources project planning and evaluation. Natural Resources Journal 42(1): 21-31.

Jacobs, J. W., and J. L. Wescoat, Jr. 2002. Managing river resources: Lessons from Glen Canyon Dam. Environment 44(2): 8-19.

Johnson, B. L. 1999. The Role of Adaptive Management as an Operational Approach for Resource Management Agencies. Conservation Ecology 3(2):8. Available online at http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art8, accessed February 13, 2003.

Johnston, J. B., M. C. Watzin, J. A. Barras, and L. R. Handley. 1995. Gulf of Mexico Coastal Wetlands: Case Studies of Loss Trends. In LaRoe, E. T., G. S. Farris, C. E. Puckett, P. D. Doran, and M. J. Mac, (eds.). Our Living Resources: A Report to the Nation on the Distribution, Abundance, and Health of U.S. Plants, Animals, and Ecosystems. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service.


Keeney, R. L. 1997. A utility function for examining policy affecting salmon in the Skeena River. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada (34): 49-63.

Kenney, D. S. 2000. Arguing About Consensus. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado School of Law.


Lane, R. R., J. W. Day, Jr., and B. Thibodeaux. 1999. Water quality analysis of a freshwater diversion at Caernarvon, Louisiana. Estuaries 22: 327-336.

League, I. W. 2003. Refuge at the Crossroads: Recommendations. Available online at http://www.iwla.org/reports/ref_rcmd.html, accessed July 28, 2003.

Lee, K. N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Lee, K. N. 1999. Appraising Adaptive Management. Conservation Ecology 3(2):3. Available online at http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art3, accessed February 13, 2003.

Lewis, J. A. 1948. Soils, Geology, and Water Control in the Everglades Region. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Agricultural Experiment Station.

Lindblom, C. 1957. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review 19 (1): 79-88.

Lindblom, C. 1979. Still muddling, not through yet. Public Administration Review 39: 517-526.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×

Louisiana DNR (Department of Natural Resources). 1999. Louisiana Coast Lines: Coast 2050 Plan Approved. Available online at http://www.dnr.state.la.us/crm/coastmgt/coastlns/lcl0399.pdf, accessed February 27, 2004.

Lubinski, K., and J. Barko. 2003. Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway System Navigation Feasibility Study: Environmental Science Panel Report. Draft. Report. Rock Island, IL, St. Louis, MO, and St. Paul, MN: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.


Maass, A. 1951. Muddy Waters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

McLain, R. J., and R. G. Lee. 1996. Adaptive management: Promises and pitfalls . Environmental Management 20: 437-438.

Murray–Darling Basin Commission Website. 2003. Available online at http://www.mdbc.gov.au/, accessed May 21, 2003.


Nancarrow, B. E., and G. J. Syme. 2001. River Murray Environment Flows and Water Quality Project: Stakeholder Profiling Study. Available online at http://www.mdbc.gov.au/whatson/PDF/stakh-report.pdf, accessed May 21, 2003.

NRC (National Research Council). 1996. Upstream: Salmon and Society in the Pacific Northwest. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 1999. Downstream: Adaptive Management of Glen Canyon Dam and the Colorado River Ecosystem. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2001a. Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2001b. Assessing the TMDL Approach to Water Quality Management. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2001c. Compensating for Wetland Losses Under the Clean Water Act. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2001d. Inland Navigation System Planning: The Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2002. The Missouri River Ecosystem: Exploring the Prospects for Recovery. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2003a. Adaptive Monitoring and Assessment for the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2003b. Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities: Adaptive Site Management: Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×

NRC. 2003c. One Step at a Time: The Staged Development of Geologic Repositories for High-Level Radioactive Waste. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

National Resources Committee. 1938. Drainage Basin Problems and Programs. Prepared by the Water Resources Committee. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.


Parma, A. M., and NCEAS Working Group on Population Management. 1998. What can adaptive management do for our fish, forests, food, and biodiversity? Integrative Biology 1:16-26.

Peat, F. D. 2002. From Certainty to Uncertainty: The Story of Science and Ideas in the Twentieth Century. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

Pickett, S. T., J. Kolasa, and C. G. Jones. 1994. Ecological Understanding: The Nature of Theory and the Theory of Nature. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.


Regan, H. M., M. Colyvan, and M. A. Burgman. 2002. A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecological Applications 12: 618-628.

Repetto, R., D. Rothman, P. Faeth and D. Austin. 1996. Has Environmental Protection Really Reduced Productivity Growth? We Need Unbiased Measures. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

Rhodes, S. L., D. Ely, and J. A. Dracup. 1984. Climate and the Colorado River: The limits of management. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 65: 682-691.


Salafsky, N., R. Margoluis, and K. Redford. 2001. Adaptive Management: A Tool for Conservation Practitioners. Washington, DC: Biodiversity Support Program.

Scudder, T. 1994. Recent Experiences with River Basin Development in the Tropics and Subtropics. Natural Resources Forum, Vol. 18.

Shindler, B. and K.A. Cheek. 1999. Integrating Citizens in Adaptive Management: A Propositional Analysis. Conservation Ecology 3(1): 9. Available online at http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art9, accessed May 21, 2003.


UMBRA (Upper Mississippi River Basin Authority). 1995. Forging a New Framework for the Future: A Report to the Governors on State and Federal Management of the Upper Mississippi River. Available online at http://www.umrba.org/reports/rptgov.pdf, accessed May 21, 2003.

UMBRA and GLC (Upper Mississippi River Basin Authority and Governors Liaison Committee). 2003. Comments of the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association and Governors Liaison Committee on

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×

the Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway Navigation Feasibility Study Memorandum for the Record regarding Ecosystem Restoration: Discussion of Authorities and Cost Sharing Options. Draft, revised June 25, 2003.

USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers). 1994. Volume 6C: Economic Studies, Recreation Economics. In Master Manual. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Northwestern Division.

USACE. 1997. Report to Congress: An Evaluation of the Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program. Rock Island, IL: United States Army Corps of Engineers.

USACE. 1998. Volume 6A-R: Economic Studies, Navigation Economics (Revised). In: Master Water Control Manual, Missouri River Review and Update Study. Omaha, NE: USACE Northwest Division, Missouri River Region.

USACE. 1999. Central and Southern Florida Project Comprehensive Review Study, Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. Jacksonville, FL: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

USACE. 2000a. Missouri River Mainstem Reservoirs Summary of Actual 1998-1999 Operations. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Northwestern Division.

USACE. 2000b. The U.S. Waterway System—Transportation Facts United States Army Corps of Engineers, Navigation Data Center.

USACE. 2001a. Civil Works Programs. IWR Report 98-R-3. Revised June, 2001. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Water Resources.

USACE, 2001b. Summary of the Missouri River Environmental Impact Statement: Revised Draft. Master Water Control Manual, Review and Update. Omaha, NE: USACE, Northwest Division.

USACE. 2002. Programmatic Regulations for the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. 33 CFR Part 385. RIN 0710-AA49. Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 149. Available online at http://www.evergladesplan.org/pm/pm_docs/prog_regulations/proposed_rule_080202.pdf, accessed July 28, 2003.

USACE and SFWMD (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the South Florida Water Management District). 2002. The Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: Development and Study Goals. Available online at http:www.evergladesplan.org/about/rest_plan.cfm, accessed July 1, 2004.

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. 1995. Operation of Glen Canyon Dam: Final Environmental Impact Statement. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×

USGS (United States Geological Survey). 1997. Missouri River Environmental Assessment Program. Washington DC: United States Geological Survey.

USGS. 1999. Ecological Status and Trends of the Upper Mississippi River System 1998: A Report of the Long Term Resource Monitoring Program. Available online at http://www.umesc.usgs.gov/reports_publications/status_and_trends.html, accessed June 11, 2003.

USGS. 2003. CWPPRA’s Restoration Projects. Available online at http://www.lacoast.gov/projects/list.asp, accessed July 28, 2003.


Walters, C. J. 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Walters, C. J. 1997. Challenges in Adaptive Management of Riparian and Coastal Ecosystems. Conservation Ecology 1(2):1. Available online at http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss2/art1, accessed February 13, 2003.

Walters, C. J., and C. S. Holling. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71: 2060-2068.

Water Resources Council. 1983. Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

White, G. F. 1961. The choice of use in resource management. Natural Resources Journal 1(March):23-40.

White, G. F. 1988. When May a Post-Audit Teach Lessons? In The Flood Control Challenge: Past, Present, and Future. Washington, DC: Public Works Historical Society.

WCD (World Commission on Dams). 2000. Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making. London: Earthscan.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×
Page 100
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×
Page 101
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×
Page 102
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×
Page 103
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×
Page 104
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×
Page 105
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10972.
×
Page 106
Next: Acronyms »
Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $46.00 Buy Ebook | $36.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This book reviews the Corps of Engineers' experiences to date with the concept of “adaptive management” and provides advice on additional and more effective implementation of this planning approach. The adaptive management concept itself is complex and evolving, but might be summarized as “learning while doing.” The book reviews literature on adaptive management and notes that a range of adaptive management practices present themselves for Corps projects. It is noted that there is no “cookbook” approach to adaptive management, and the book encourages the Corps of Engineers to continue to work with and learn from its applications of the concept. To facilitate institutional learning and to ensure that experiences are being employed across the agency, the book recommends that a Corps Center for Adaptive Management be established. The book also notes that greater involvement from the administration and Congress will be essential to successful adaptive management applications, as the Corps' efforts in this area will benefit from clarified water resources management objectives, the authority to manage adaptively, and from resources necessary for programs such as stakeholder collaboration and post-construction evaluations.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!