National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 6 Epilogue
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Planning: A New Opportunity for Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10975.
×

References

Adler, R.W. 2003. The two lost books in the water quality trilogy: the elusive objectives of physical and biological integrity. Environmental Law 33:29-77.

Anderson, J. L., R. W. Hillborn, R. T. Lackey, and D. Ludwig. 2003. Watershed restoration: Adaptive decision making in the face of uncertainty. P. 203 in R. C. Wissmar and P. A. Bisson (eds.) Strategies for Restoring River Ecosystems: Sources of Variability and Uncertainty in Natural and Managed Systems. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Societies.

Anfinson, J. O. 1993. Commerce and Conservation on the Upper Mississippi River. The Annals of Iowa 52(4): 385-417.


Barry, J. M. 1997. Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How It Changed America. New York: Simon and Schuster.


DOI (Department of the Interior). 2002. Preventing Crises and Conflict in the West. Available on-line at http://www.doi.gov/water2025 (accessed February 4, 2004).


Ellet, C. Jr. 1853. The Mississippi and Ohio Rivers: Containing Plans for the Protection of the Delta. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Grambo, and Company.


Fastabend, D. A. 2002. Opening Statement of BG. David A. Fastabend, Division Engineer, Northwest Division. Testimony on Water Resources Mangement Issues on the Missouri River before the Water and Power Sub-committee of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate 10, July, 2002. Available on-line at: http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/functions/cw/hot_topics/openstate_10jul02.htm (accessed February 9, 2004).


Gunderson, L. 1999. Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management—Antidotes for spurious certitude? Conservation Ecology 3(1):7. Available on-line at http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art7 (accessed February 13, 2003).


Hays, S. P. 1959. Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Holliday, W. 2002. Report of Revitalization of the Corps of Engineers Projects. IWR Report 03-PS-1. Available on-line at http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/iwr/pdf/project_strat_report.pdf (accessed February 9, 2004).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Planning: A New Opportunity for Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10975.
×

Holmes, B. H. 1979. History of Federal Water Resources Programs and Policies, 1961- 1970. Department of Agriculture Misc. Pub. 1379. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.


Kneese, A., and S. Smith (eds.). 1966. Water Research. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Koel, T. M., and R. E. Sparks. 2002. Historical patterns of river stage and fish communities as criteria for operations of dams on the Illinois River. River Research and Applications 18:3-19.


Lackey, R. T. 2001. Values, Policy, and Ecosystem Health. Bioscience 51(6):437-443.

Lee, K. N. 1999. Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology 3(2):3.

Lord, W. B. 1979. Conflict in federal water resource planning. Water Resources Bulletin 15(5):1226-1235


Maass, A. 1951. Muddy Waters: The Army Engineers and the Nation’s Rivers. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Maass, A., M. M. Hufschmidt, R. Dorfman, H. A. Thomas, Jr., St. A. Marglin, and G. M. Fair. 1962. Design of Water Resource Systems. New Techniques for Relating Economic Objectives, Engineering Analysis, and Governmental Planning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Martin, L. 2002. Regional Sediment Management: Background and Overview of Initial Implementation. IWR Report 02-PS-2. Belvoir, VA: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources. Available on-line at http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/iwr/pdf/02ps2sed_man.pdf (accessed on July 1, 2004).

Mazmanian, D. A., and J. Neinaber. 1979. Can Organization Change: Environmental Protection, Citizen Participation, and the Corps of Engineers. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institute.


Nature Conservancy. Undated. Sustainable Rivers Projects. Available on-line at http://nature.org/success/dams.html (accessed on July 12, 2004).

NCPS (National Commission on the Public Service). 2003. Urgent Business for America: Revitalizing the Federal Government for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute for Public Service.

NCWQ (National Commission on Water Quality). 1976. Final Report of the National Commission on Water Quality. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

NRC (National Research Council). 1991. Opportunities in Hydrologic Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 1995. Flood Risk Management and the American River Basin. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2001. Assessing the TMDL Approach to Water Quality Management. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Planning: A New Opportunity for Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10975.
×

NRC. 2002a. The Missouri River Ecosystem: Exploring the Prospects for Recovery. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2002b. Review Procedures for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2004. Managing the Columbia River: Instream Flows, Water Withdrawals, and Salmon Survival. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

NRLC (Natural Resources Law Center). 2000. The Watershed Source Book: Watershed-Based Solutions to Natural Resource Problems. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Law School.

NWC (National Water Commission). 1973. Water Policies for the Future: Final Report to the President and Congress of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.


Pisani, D. J. 2002. Water and American Government: The Reclamation Bureau, National Water Policy, and the West, 1902-1935. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Porter, T. M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.


Reisner, M. 1986. Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water. New York: Penguin Books.

Richter, B. D., R. Mathews, D. L. Harrison, and R. Wigington. 2003. Ecologically sustainable water management: Managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecological App. 13 (1):206-224.


Schneiders, R. K. 1999. Unruly River: Two Centuries of Change Along the Missouri . Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

Scott, M. 1971. American City Planning Since 1980. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Shabman, L. 1993. Environmental Activities in Corps of Engineers Water Resources Programs: Charting a New Direction. IWR Report 93-PS-1. Fort Belvoir, VA: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources.

Shabman, L., and G. E. Dickey. Federal financial responsibility for coastal port development: A study of the process of policy redefinition. Policy Studies Review 6.2 (November 1986): 358-365.

Shallat, T. 2000. Structures in the Stream: Water, Science, & the Rise of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Stakhiv, E. Z. 2003. Disintegrated water resources management in the U.S.: Union of Sisyphus and Pandora. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 129(3):151-154.

Strand, M. 1997. Wetlands Deskbook. 2nd Edition. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Law Institute.


USACE. 1995. Ecosystem Restoration in the Civil Works Program. ER-1105-2-210. Washington, D.C.: USACE.

USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2000. Planning Guidance Notebook. ER 1105-2-100. Available on-line at: http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/usace-docs/eng-regs/er1105-2-100/toc.htm (accessed February 9, 2004).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Planning: A New Opportunity for Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10975.
×

USACE. 2001. Civil Works Programs. IWR Report 98-R-3. Fort Belvoir, VA: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources.

USACE. 2002. Planning and Engineering Competency. EC 1110-1-104. Available on-line at http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/usace-docs/engcirculars/ec1110-1-104/toc.htm (accessed February 9, 2004).

USACE. 2003a. Planning Civil Works Projects Under the Environmental Operating Principles. EC 1105-2-404. Washington, D.C.: USACE.

USACE. 2003b. USACE 2012: Aligning the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for Success in the 21st Century. Available on-line at http://www.hq.usace.army.mil/stakeholders/Final.htm (accessed on February 9, 2004).

USACE. 2003c. Shared Vision Planning. Available on-line at http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/iwr/svp/svppage.htm (accessed February 9, 2004).

USACE. Undated. Reservoir Operating Plan Evaluation (ROPE) Study for Mississippi Headwaters. Available on-line at http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/fl_damage_reduct/default.asp?pageid=143 (accessed July 12, 2004).

USACE. 2004a. Alternative Formulation Briefing Pre-Conference Report for the UMR-IWW System Navigation Feasibility Study. Available on-line at http://www2.mvr.usace.army.mil/umr-iwwsns/documents/AFB%20PreConference%20Report%20(2-9-04).pdf (accessed July 12, 2004).

USACE. 2004b. Summary: Missouri River Final Environmental Impact Statement (Master Water Control Manual Review and Update). Omaha, NE: USACE.

USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2002. Report to Congress: Concepts for National Assessment of Water Availability and Use. USGS Circular 1223. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.


White, G. F. 1957. Geography, Resources, and Environment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Wengert, N. 1980. A critical review of the river basin as a focus for resources planning, development, and management. Pp. 12-30 In Unified River Basin Management. Minneapolis, MN: American Water Resources Association.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Planning: A New Opportunity for Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10975.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Planning: A New Opportunity for Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10975.
×
Page 86
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Planning: A New Opportunity for Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10975.
×
Page 87
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Planning: A New Opportunity for Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10975.
×
Page 88
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Planning: A New Opportunity for Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10975.
×
Page 89
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Planning: A New Opportunity for Service. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10975.
×
Page 90
Next: Appendix A: Water Resources Development Act 2000 »
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Water Resources Planning: A New Opportunity for Service Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $43.00 Buy Ebook | $34.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

From the Executive Summary:

There are some concerns that the current Corps planning and construction budget has not kept pace with expanding national water management needs for flood hazard management, water transportation, and other purposes. At the same time, others question the wisdom of and budgetary prospects for the continuation of a traditional water project construction program. Debates about water use and funding priorities now extend to intense scrutiny of Corps of Engineers planning, investment, and project operations programs.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!