References

Advisory Commission on Patent Law Reform. (1992). Report of the Advisory Commission on Patent Law Reform. U.S. Department of Commerce.

Advisory Committee on Industrial Innovation. (1978). Final Reports: Patent Policy Report. U.S. Department of Commerce.

Allison, J. and M. Lemley. (1998). “Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents.AIPLA Quarterly Journal 26:185-277.

Allison, J. and M. Lemley. (2000). “How Federal Circuit Judges Vote in Patent Validity Cases.” Florida State University Law Review 27(3):745-766.

Allison. J. and M. Lemley. (2002). “The Growing Complexity of the United States Patent System.” Boston University Law Review 82(1):77-144.

Allison, J., and E. Tiller. (2003). “Internet Business Method Patents.” In Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, W. Cohen and S. Merrill, eds. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

American Intellectual Property Law Association. (2003). AIPLA Report of Economic Survey, 2003. Washington, D.C.: Fetzer-Kraus, Inc.

Anand, B. and T. Khanna. (2000). “The Structure of Licensing Contracts.” Journal of Industrial Economics 48(1):103-135.

Arora, A., A. Fosfuri, and A. Gambardella. (2001). Markets for Technology: Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Arora, A., M. Ceccagnoli, and W. Cohen. (2002). “R&D and the Patent Premium.” Unpublished Paper (Feb.).

Arundel, A., J. Cobbenhagen, and N. Schall. (2002). The Acquisition and Protection of Competencies by Enterprises. Report for EIMS project 98/180, DG Enterprise, European Union, Luxembourg.

Association of University Technology Managers. (2003). AUTM Licensing Survey: FY 2000. Northbrook, IL: Association of University Technology Managers.


Baldwin J., P. Hanel, and D. Sabourin. (2000). “Determinants of Innovative Activity in Canadian Manufacturing Firms: The Role of Intellectual Property Rights.” Statistics Canada Working Paper No. 122 (Mar.). Available at http://www.statcan.ca/cgi-bin/downpub/listpub.cgi?catno=11F0019MIE2000122.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 130
A Patent System for the 21st Century References Advisory Commission on Patent Law Reform. (1992). Report of the Advisory Commission on Patent Law Reform. U.S. Department of Commerce. Advisory Committee on Industrial Innovation. (1978). Final Reports: Patent Policy Report. U.S. Department of Commerce. Allison, J. and M. Lemley. (1998). “Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents.” AIPLA Quarterly Journal 26:185-277. Allison, J. and M. Lemley. (2000). “How Federal Circuit Judges Vote in Patent Validity Cases.” Florida State University Law Review 27(3):745-766. Allison. J. and M. Lemley. (2002). “The Growing Complexity of the United States Patent System.” Boston University Law Review 82(1):77-144. Allison, J., and E. Tiller. (2003). “Internet Business Method Patents.” In Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, W. Cohen and S. Merrill, eds. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. American Intellectual Property Law Association. (2003). AIPLA Report of Economic Survey, 2003. Washington, D.C.: Fetzer-Kraus, Inc. Anand, B. and T. Khanna. (2000). “The Structure of Licensing Contracts.” Journal of Industrial Economics 48(1):103-135. Arora, A., A. Fosfuri, and A. Gambardella. (2001). Markets for Technology: Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Arora, A., M. Ceccagnoli, and W. Cohen. (2002). “R&D and the Patent Premium.” Unpublished Paper (Feb.). Arundel, A., J. Cobbenhagen, and N. Schall. (2002). The Acquisition and Protection of Competencies by Enterprises. Report for EIMS project 98/180, DG Enterprise, European Union, Luxembourg. Association of University Technology Managers. (2003). AUTM Licensing Survey: FY 2000. Northbrook, IL: Association of University Technology Managers. Baldwin J., P. Hanel, and D. Sabourin. (2000). “Determinants of Innovative Activity in Canadian Manufacturing Firms: The Role of Intellectual Property Rights.” Statistics Canada Working Paper No. 122 (Mar.). Available at http://www.statcan.ca/cgi-bin/downpub/listpub.cgi?catno=11F0019MIE2000122.

OCR for page 130
A Patent System for the 21st Century Barr, R. (2002). “Statement to the Joint FTC/DOJ Hearing on Competition and Intellectual Property Law and Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy, February 28, 2002.” Available at http://www.ftc.gov/opp/intellect/index.htm. Bar-Shalom, A. and R. Cook-Deegan. (2002). “Patents and Innovation in Cancer Therapeutics: Lessons from CellPro.” Millbank Quarterly 80(4):637-676. Barton, J. (2000). “Reforming the Patent System.” Science 287(5460):1933-1934. Barton, J. (2002). “Antitrust Treatment of Oligopolies with Mutually Blocking Patent Portfolios.” Antitrust Law Journal 69(3):851-882. Barton, J. (2003). “Non-obviousness.” IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology 43:475. Bekkers, R., G. Duysters, and B. Verspagen. (2002) “IPR, strategic technology agreements and market structure: The case of GSM.” Research Policy 31:1141-1161. Berman, B. (2002). “From Tech Transfer to Joint Ventures – Part 1.” Cafezine. Available at http://www.cafezine.com/index_article.asp?deptId=5&id=555&page=1. Bernstein, M. (1955). Regulating Business by Independent Commission. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Bessen, J. and E. Maskin. (2000). “Sequential Innovation, Patents and Imitation.” MIT Department of Economics Working Paper Number 00-01. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=206189. Blanton, K. (2002). “Corporate Takeover.” Boston Globe (24 Feb. 2002): Magazine. Branstetter, L., R. Fisman, and C. Foley. (2003). “Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from U.S. Firm-Level Panel Data.” Unpublished Paper. Available at http://econ.worldbank.org/files/35589_wps3305.pdf. Burk, D. and M. Lemley. (2003a). “Policy Levers in Patent Law.” Virginia Law Review 89(7):1575-1696. Burk, D. and M. Lemley. (2003b). “Biotechnology’s Uncertainty Principle.” University of Minnesota School of Law Public Law and Theory Research Paper No. 03-5. Bush, V. (1945). Science, the Endless Frontier. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation. Chisum, D. (1997). “Best Mode Concealment and Inequitable Conduct In Patent Procurement: A Nutshell, A Review of Recent Federal Circuit Cases and A Plea for Modest Reform.” Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 13:277-319. Cho, M., S. Illangasekare, M. Weaver, D.G.B. Leonard, and J.F. Merz. (2003). “Effects of Patents and Licenses on the Provision of Clinical Genetic Testing Services.” Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 5(1):3-8. Clarke, R. (2003). “U.S. Continuity Law and Its Impact on the Comparative Patenting Rates of the US, Japan, and European Patent Offices.” Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 8(Apr.):335-349. Cockburn, I. (2004). “The Changing Structure of the Pharmaceutical Industry.” Health Affairs 23(1):10-22. Cockburn, I., S. Kortum, and S. Stern. (2003). “Are All Patent Examiners Equal? Examiners, Patent Characteristics, and Litigation Outcomes.” In Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, W. Cohen and S. Merrill, eds. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Cohen, J. and M. Lemley (2001). “Patent Scope and Innovation in the Software Industry.” California Law Review. 89:1-58. Cohen, W. (2002). “The Pro-Patent Movement in the United States: Indicators and Impacts.” Unpublished Paper. Cohen, W., A. Goto, A. Nagata, R. Nelson, and J. Walsh. (2002). “R&D Spillovers, Patents and the Incentives to Innovate in Japan and the United States.” Research Policy 31:1349-1367. Cohen, W., R. Nelson, and J. Walsh. (2000). “Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not).” NBER Working Paper 7552. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w7552.

OCR for page 130
A Patent System for the 21st Century Cohen, W. and S. Merrill. (2003). “Introduction.” In Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, W. Cohen and S. Merrill, eds. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Commission of the European Communities. (2000). Proposal for a Council Regulation on the Community Patent (Aug. 1). Available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/indprop/patent/412en.pdf. Cutter, T. (2004). “An Economic Analysis of Enhanced Damages and Attorneys’ Fees for Willful Infringement.” Paper presented to the Symposium on Willful Infringement sponsored by the Oracle Corporation and the George Washington University Law School, Washington, D.C., Mar. 19. Desmond, R. (1993). “Nothing Seems Obvious to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: The Federal Circuit, Unchecked by the Supreme Court, Transforms the Standard of Obviousness Under the Patent Law.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 26:455-490. Dolak, L. (2000). “As if You Didn’t Have Enough to Worry About: Current Ethics Issues for Intellectual Property Practitioners.” Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 82:235. Dreyfuss, R. (1989). “The Federal Circuit: A Case Study in Specialized Courts.” New York University Law Review 64:1. Dreyfuss, R. (2003). “Varying the Course.” In Perspectives on Properties of the Human Genome Project, F. Kieff, ed. New York, NY: Academic Press. Dreyfuss, R. (forthcoming). “The Federal Circuit: A Continuing Experiment in Specialization.” Case Western Reserve Law Journal. Dunner, D., J. Jakes, and J. Karceski. (1995). “A Statistical Look at the Federal Circuit’s Patent Decisions: 1982-1994.” Federal Circuit Bar Journal 5:151-180. Eisenberg, R. (1989). “Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use.” University of Chicago Law Review 56:1017-1086. European Patent Office. (1999). Case Law of the Boards of Appeal. Available at http://www.european-patent-office.org/legal/case_law/e/index.htm. Federal Trade Commission. (2003). To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy. Available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/10/innovationrpt.pdf. Federico, P. (1956). “Adjudicated Patent Statistics.” Journal of the Patent Office Society 38(4):233-249. Gallini, N.T. (1984). “Deterrence by Market Sharing: A Strategic Incentive for Licensing.” American Economic Review 74(5):931-941. Gallini, N. (1992). “Patent Policy and Costly Imitation.” Rand Journal of Economics 23:52-63. Gallini, N. (2001). “How Well Is the U.S. Patent System Working.” Unpublished Paper (Jul.). Gallini, N. (2002). “The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(2):131-154. Graham, S., B. Hall, D. Harhoff, and D. Mowery. (2003). “Patent Quality Control: A Comparison of U.S. Patent Re-examinations and European Patent Oppositions.” In Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, W. Cohen and S. Merrill, eds. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Graham, S. and D. Mowery. (2003). “Intellectual Property Protection in the U.S. Software Industry.” In Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, W. Cohen and S. Merrill, eds. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Green, J. and S. Scotchmer. (1995). “On the Division of Profit in Sequential Innovation.” RAND Journal of Economics 26(1):20-33. Hall, B. (2003a). “Exploring the Patent Explosion.” Unpublished paper. Available at http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/bhhall/papers/BHH%20Mannheim03.pdf. Hall, B. (2003b). “Business Method Patents, Innovation, and Policy.” Unpublished Paper. Available at http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/bhhall/papers/BHH%20on%20BMP%20May03WP.pdf. Hall, B. and R. Ziedonis. (2001). “The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry.” RAND Journal of Economics 32(1):101-128.

OCR for page 130
A Patent System for the 21st Century Harhoff, D. (2003). “Legal Challenges to Patent Validity in the U.S. and Europe.” Presentation to OECD Conference on IPR, Innovation, and Economic Performance (August 28, 2003). Available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/14/31/11728549.pdf. Heller, M. and R. Eisenberg. (1998). “Can Patents Deter Innovation: The Anticommons in Biomedical Research” Science 280:698-701. Heffan, I. (1997). “Willful Patent Infringement.” Federal Circuit Bar Journal 7(Summer):115. Henderson, R., L. Orsenigo, and G. Pisano. (1999). “The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Revolution in Molecular Biology: Interactions among Scientific, Institutional and Organizational Change.” In Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries, D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press. Henry, M., M. Cho, M. Weaver, and J. Merz. (2002). “DNA Patenting and Licensing.” Science 297(5585):1279. Hicks, D. (1999). “Innovation in Information Technology in the United States: A Portrait Based on Patent Analysis.” CHI Research Working Paper. Hicks, D., T. Breitzman, D. Olivastro, and K. Hamilton. (2001). “The Changing Composition of Innovative Activity in the US—A Portrait Based on Patent Analysis.” Research Policy 30(4):681-704. Hofer, R. and L. Fitzgerald. (1995). “New Rules for Old Problems: Defining the Contours of the Best Mode Requirement in Patent Law.” American University Law Review 44:2309. Horstmann, I., G. M. MacDonald, and A. Slivinski. (1985). “Patents as Information Transfer Mechanisms: To Patent or (Maybe) not to Patent.” Journal of Political Economy 93(5):837-858. Hunt, R. (1999). “Non-obviousness and the Incentive to Innovate: An Economic Analysis of Intellectual Property Reform.” Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 99-3. Available at http://www.phil.frb.org/files/wps/1999/wp99-3.pdf. Hunt, R. (2001). “You Can Patent That? Are Patents on Computer Programs and Business Methods Good for the New Economy?” Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank Business Review 2001(Q1):5-15. Institute of Medicine. (2003). Large-Scale Biomedical Science: Exploring Strategies for Future Research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine. (Forthcoming). Shortening the Timeline for New Cancer Treatments. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Intellectual Property Owners Association. (2003). “Statement of Intellectual Property Owners Association to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property (Apr. 3).” Available at http://www.ipo.org/AMTemplate.cfm?Section=IPO_Position_Statements1&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=8383. Jaffe, A. (1999). “The U.S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process.” NBER Working Paper 7280. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w7280. Jaffe, A. (2000). “The U.S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process.” Research Policy 29:531-557. Jaffe, A. and J. Lerner. (2004). Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Janis, M. (2002). “Patent Abolitionism.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 17(2):899-952. Japan Patent Office, European Patent Office, and U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2001). “Trilateral Statistical Report.” Available at http://www.european-patent-office-org/tws/tsr_2001/index.php. Jorgenson, D. and K. Stiroh. (2002) “Raising the Speed Limit: U.S. Economic Growth in the Information Age.” In Measuring and Sustaining the New Economy, D. Jorgenson and C. Wessner, eds. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Kastriner, L. (1991). “The Revival of Confidence in the Patent System.” Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 73:5-23.

OCR for page 130
A Patent System for the 21st Century King, J. (2003). “Patent Examination Procedures and Patent Quality.” In Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, W. Cohen and S. Merrill, eds. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Koenig, G. (1980). Patent Invalidity: A Statistical and Substantive Analysis. New York: Clark Boardman. Korn, D and S. J. Heinig, eds. (2002). “Public versus Private Ownership of Scientific Discovery: Legal and Economic Analyses of the Implications of Human Gene Patents.” Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 77(Dec.):1301-1308. Kortum, S. and J. Lerner. (1998). “Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 48:247-304. Lanjouw, J. and I. Cockburn. (2000). “Do Patents Matter? Empirical Evidence After GATT.” NBER Working Paper No. 7495. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=214635. Lanjouw, J. and J. Lerner. (1997). “The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: A Survey of the Empirical Literature.” NBER Working Paper No. W6296. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=226053. Lanjouw, J. and M. Schankerman. (2003). “Enforcement of Patent Rights in the United States.” In Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, W. Cohen and S. Merrill, eds. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Laurie, R. and R. Beyers. (2001). “The Patentability of Internet Business Methods: A Systematic Approach to Evaluating Obviousness.” Journal of Internet Law 4(11). Lemley, M. (2001). “Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office.” Northwestern University Law Review 95(4):1495-1532. Lemley, M. (2002). “An Empirical Study of the 20-Year Patent Term.” In The Economics of Intellectual Property, R. Towse and R. W. Holzhauer, eds. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar Publishing. Lemley, M. and C. Chien. (2003). “Are the U.S. Patent Priority Rules Necessary?” Boalt Working Papers in Public Law, no. 32. Available at http://repositories.cdlib.org/boaltwp/32. Lemley, M. and K. Moore. (2004). “Abolishing Patent Continuations.” Boston University Law Review 84(Feb.):101. Lemley, M. and R. Tangri. (2003). “Ending Patent Law’s Willfulness Game.” UC Berkeley Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, no. 142. Lerner, J. (1995). “Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors.” Journal of Law and Economics. 38(Oct.):463-495. Lerner, J. (2002). “150 Years of Patent Protection.” American Economic Review 92(2):221-225. Levin, J. and R. Levin. (2003). “Benefits and Costs of an Opposition Process.” In Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, W. Cohen and S. Merrill, eds. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Levin, R. (1982). “The Semiconductor Industry.” In Government and Technical Progress: A Cross-Industry Analysis, R. R. Nelson, ed. New York: Pergamon Press. Levin, R., A. Klevorick, R. Nelson, and S. Winter. (1987). “Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3:783-820. Lunney, G. (2001). “E-Obviousness.” Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 7(363):363-421. Available at http://www.mttlr.org/volseven/LunneytypeRE-PDF.pdf. Mansfield, E. (1986). “Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study.” Management Science 32:173-181. Merges, R. (1994). “Intellectual Property Rights and Bargaining Breakdown: The Case of Blocking Patents.” Tennessee Law Review 62(1):74-106. Merges, R. (1999). “As Many as Six Impossible Patents Before Breakfast: Property Rights for Business Concepts and Patent System Reform.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 14:578-615.

OCR for page 130
A Patent System for the 21st Century Merges, R. and J. Duffy. (2002). Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials. 3rd Edition, New York: Matthew Bender. Merges, R. and R. Nelson. (1990). “On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope.” Columbia Law Review 90(4):839-916. Merton, R. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Meurer, M. (1989). “The Settlement of Patent Litigation.” RAND Journal of Economics 20:77-91. Merz, J. F, D. G. Kriss, D. D. G. Leonard, and M. K. Cho. (2002). “Diagnostic Testing Fails the Test.” Nature 415(7 Feb.):577-579. Moser, P. (2003). “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth Century World Fairs.” NBER Working Paper No. w9909. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w9909. Mossinghoff, G. (2002). “The First-to-Invent System Has Provided No Advantage to Small Entities.” Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 84(6):1. Mossinghoff, G. and V. Kuo. (1998). “World Patent System Circa 20XX, A.D.” IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology 38:529-575. Mossinghoff, G. J. and V. Kuo. (2002). “Post-Grant Review of Patents: Enhancing the Quality of the Fuel of Interest.” IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology 43(1):83-110. Nard, C. (2002). “Toward a Cautious Approach to Obeisance: The Role of Scholarship in Patent Law Jurisprudence.” Houston Law Review 39(3):667-692. National Institutes of Health. (1998). “Report of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Working Group on Research Tools. Presented to the Advisory Committee to the Director, June 4, 1998.” Available at http://www.nih.gov/news/researchtools/index.htm. National Research Council. (1919). Report of the Patent Committee of the National Research Council. Reprint and Circular Series, Number 1. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council. National Research Council. (1936). “Report of the Committee on the Relation of the Patent System to the Stimulation of New Industries.” Journal of the Patent Office Society 18(2):94-107. National Research Council. (1997) Intellectual Property Rights and Research Tools in Molecular Biology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (1999a). Securing America’s Industrial Strength. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (1999b). U.S. Industry in 2000: Studies in Competitive Performance. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2000). The Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information Age. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2001). Trends in Federal Support of Research and Graduate Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Nelson, R. (2003). “The Market Economy and the Scientific Commons.” Unpublished paper. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2002). The Ethics of Patenting DNA. London, UK: Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Available at http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publications/pp_0000000014.asp. O’Donoghue, T., S. Scotchmer, and J.-F. Thisse. (1998). “Patent Breadth, Patent Life, and the Pace of Technological Progress.” Journal of Economic Management and Strategy 7(1):1-32. OECD. (2003). “Patents and Innovation: Trends and Policy Changes.” DSTI/STP (2003)27. Available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/12/24508541.pdf. O’Rourke, M. (2000). “Toward a Doctrine of Fair Use in Patent Law.” Columbia Law Review 100(5):1177-1250. Park, W. and J. Ginarte. (1997). “Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth.” Contemporary Economic Policy 15(Jul.):51-61. Pollack, A. (2002). “University Resolves Dispute on Stem Cell Patent License.” The New York Times, January 10, C11. Pooley. J. (1997-1999). Trade Secrets. New York: Law Journal Press.

OCR for page 130
A Patent System for the 21st Century Poplawski, E. (2001). “Effective Preparation of Patent Related Exculpatory Legal Opinions.” AIPLA Quarterly Journal 29(3):269-316. Powers, M. and S. Carlson. (2001). “The Evolution and Impact of the Doctrine of Willful Patent Infringement.” Syracuse Law Review 51:53-115. President’s Commission on the Patent System. (1966). “To Promote the Progress of … Useful Arts” In an Age of Exploding Technology. Washington, D.C. Priest, G. (1986). “What Economists Can Tell Lawyers about Intellectual Property.” Research on Law and Economics 8:19. Quillen, C. and O. Webster. (2001). “Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S. Patent Office.” Federal Circuit Bar Journal 11(1):1-21. Quillen, C., O. Webster, and R. Eichmann. (2002). “Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office—Extended.” Federal Circuit Bar Journal 12(1):33-55. Rai, A. and R. Eisenberg. (2003). “Bayh-Dole Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66(Winter/Spring):289-314. Rivette, K. and D. Kline. (2000). Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Sakakibara, M. and L. Branstetter. (2001).”Do Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese Patent Law Reforms.” Rand Journal of Economics 32:77-100. Saxenian, A. (1996). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Boston: Harvard University Press. Scherer, F. M., S. Herzstein, Jr., A. Dreyfoos, W. Whitney, O. Bachmann, C. Pesek, C. Scott, T. Kelly, and J. Galvin. (1959). Patents and the Corporation: A Report on Industrial Technology Under Changing Public Policy. 2nd ed. Boston: Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration. Scotchmer, S. (1991). “Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1):29-41. Scotchmer, S. (1996). “Protecting Early Innovators: Should Second Generation Products Be Patentable?” RAND Journal of Economics 27(2):322-331. Shimbo, I., R. Nakajima, S. Yokoyama, and K. Sumikura. (2004). “Patent Protection for Protein Structure Analysis.” Nature Biotechnology 22(1):109-112. Stolberg, S. (2001). “Suit Seeks to Expand Access to Stem Cells.” The New York Times, August 14, C2. Strandburg, K. (2004). “What Does the Public Get? Experimental Use and the Patent Bargain.” Wisconsin Law Review 73(1):81-155. Taylor, C. and Z. Silbertson. (1973). The Economic Impact of the Patent System: A Study of the British Experience. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press. Taylor, E. and G. Von Tersch. (1998). “A Proposal to Shore up the Foundation of Patent Law that the Underwater Line Eroded.” Hastings Communication & Entertainment Law Journal 20:721. United Kingdom Royal Society. (2003). “Keeping Science Open: The Effects of Intellectual Property Policy on the Conduct of Science.” Available at http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/files/statfiles/document-221.pdf. U.S. Court of Claims. (2002). “Rules of the United States Federal Court of Claims.” Available at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/rules.htm. U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Inspector General. (1990). “Improvements Needed in the Patent Quality Review Program.” Audit Report No. EAD-0231-0-0002, Feb. U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Inspector General. (1997). “Patent Quality Controls are Inadequate.” Audit Report No. PTD-997707-0001, Sept. U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Inspector General. (1998). “Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences: High Inventory and Inadequate Monitoring Threaten Effectiveness of Appeals Process.” Audit Report No. BTD-10628-8-0001, Sept.

OCR for page 130
A Patent System for the 21st Century U.S. General Accounting Office. (2001). “State Immunity in Infringement Actions.” GAO-01-811, Sept. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2002). “Federal Action Needed to Help Small Businesses Address Foreign Patent Challenges.” GAO-92-789, July. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (1996). “Examination Guidelines for Computer-Related Inventions; Final Version.” Federal Register 61(40):7478-7492. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2001). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2000. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2002a). Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP). Edition 8 (Aug.). Available at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/index.html. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2002b). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Performance and Accountability Report, Fiscal Year 2001. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2003a). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Performance and Accountability Report, Fiscal Year 2002. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2003b). The 21st Century Strategic Plan. Available at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/strat21/stratplan_03feb2003.pdf. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2003c). Post-Grant Review of Patent Claims. Available at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/strat21/action/sr2.htm. Vermont, S. (2001). “A New Way to Determine Obviousness: Applying the Pioneer Doctrine to 35 U.S.C. § 103(A).” AIPLA Quarterly Journal 29(Summer):375-444. von Hippel, E. (2001). “Innovation by User Communities: Learning from Open Source Software.” Sloan Management Review 42(4):82-86. Wagner, R. P. (2003). “Of Patents and Path Dependency: A Comment on Burk and Lemley.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 18:1341-1360. Walsh, J., A. Arora, and W. Cohen. (2003). “Research Tool Patent and Licensing and Biomedical Innovation.” In Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, W. Cohen and S. Merrill, eds. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Ziedonis, R. (2003). “Patent Litigation in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry.” In Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, W. Cohen and S. Merrill, eds. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.