National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$47.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Saving Women's Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis (2005)
National Cancer Policy Board (NCPB)
Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy (STEP)

Citation Manager

. "4 Understanding Breast Cancer Risk." Saving Women's Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
137
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Saving Women’s Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis

Gene

Description

Effect on Breast Cancer Risk

Odds Ratio*

Other genes

VDR

Protein product is a receptor that acts as a transcriptional regulatory factor and can stimulate cell differentiation.

Study results are contradictory; association remains unclear.

0.95 CI 0.74-1.20

APC

Tumor suppressor gene that arrests the cell cycle and prevents further cell division and unregulated growth. When mutated the gene is associated with colorectal cancer.

Probably does not play a role in increased risk of breast cancer.

N/A

*Odds ratios for only heterozygous genotype for most common variant alleles are listed (CI= 95% confidence interval).

MANAGING RISK

Individualized Risk Prediction

Understanding that women do not have uniform risk for breast cancer suggests the possibility that they could be stratified into high- or low-risk groups. In theory, such stratification should indicate which women are most likely to benefit from more intensive screening for breast cancer (Figure 4-1). For example, most women would gain no medical benefit from screening before age 40 or from twice-yearly screening, but a small minority could. Conversely, many women could safely be screened for breast cancer only every 2 years, or perhaps even at longer intervals. And even though men can develop breast cancer, it occurs too rarely to warrant mammography screening for men in the general population (Box 4-3). The goal of improving risk assessment is to stratify breast cancer detection strategies with the aim of increasing survival in high-risk women while decreasing cost and complications in low-risk women.23 The challenge lies in developing a more refined understanding of how to assess risk in individual women, and that depends on data from well-designed, large-scale epidemiological studies.

Mammography screening guidelines already take into account two of the most significant risk factors, gender and age. But we could do much

Page
137