|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. 2. American Cancer Society. 2001. Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2001-2002. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society. 3. Balas E, Boren SA. 2000. Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement. Bemmel J, McCray AT, Editors. Yearbook of Medical Informatics: Patient-Centered Systems. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. Pp. 65-70. 4. Black WC, Nease RF Jr, Tosteson AN. 1995. Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. J Natl Cancer Inst 87(10):720-731. 5. Brownlee S. 2003, August 3. Health, Hope and Hype: why the media oversells medical “breakthroughs.” The Washington Post. 6. Bunker JP, Houghton J, Baum M. 1998. Putting the risk of breast cancer in perspective. BMJ 317(7168):1307-1309. 7. Burke W, Olsen AH, Pinsky LE, Reynolds SE, Press NA. 2001. Misleading presentation of breast cancer in popular magazines. Eff Clin Pract 4(2):58-64. 8. Dolan NC, Lee AM, McDermott MM. 1997. Age-related differences in breast carcinoma knowledge, beliefs, and perceived risk among women visiting an academic general medicine practice. Cancer 80(3):413-420. 9. Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Koepsell TD, Desnick LM, D’Orsi CJ, Ransohoff DF. 2003. International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(18):1384-1393. 10. Fulton JP, Rakowski W, Jones AC. 1995. Determinants of breast cancer screening among inner-city Hispanic women in comparison with other inner-city women. Public Health Rep 110(4):476-482. 11. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2001. Mammography and Beyond: Developing Technologies for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 12. Institute of Medicine. 2003. Exploring Challenges, Progress, and New Models for Engaging the Public in the Clinical Research Enterprise: Clinical Research Roundtable Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 13. Lavelle K, Charlton A. 1998. Women’s perception of risk of cancer. BMJ 317(7157):542. 14. Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D’Orsi CJ, Isaacs PK, Moss LJ, Karellas A, Sisney GA, Kuni CC, Cutter GR. 2001. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 218(3):873-880. 15. McCaul KD, Branstetter AD, O’Donnell SM, Jacobson K, Quinlan KB. 1998. A descriptive study of breast cancer worry. J Behav Med 21(6):565-579. 16. MORI Medicine & Science Research. 2002, October 17. Women See Family History Not Old Age as Greatest Breast Cancer Risk [MORI is an approved survey firm for the British National Health Service]. Accessed May 13, 2003. Web Page. Available at: http://www.mori.com/polls/2002/breakthrough.shtml. 17. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Research Portfolio. 2003. Accessed June 1, 2004. Web Page. Available at: http://researchportfolio.cancer.gov/. 18. Phillips KP, Kanter EJ, Bednarczyk B, Tastad PL. 1991. Importance of the lay press in the transmission of medical knowledge to the scientific community. N Engl J Med (325):1180-1183. 19. Pilote L, Hlatky MA. 1995. Attitudes of women toward hormone therapy and prevention of heart disease. Am Heart J 129(6):1237-1238. 20. Press N. 1995. Survey, Orange County Region 10 California State Breast Cancer Early Detection Partnership Program (BCEDP). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health.
|
|
|||||||||||||||
